Cargando…

The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – A critique

Recognising that mild asthmatics are at risk of exacerbations and mortality, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) issued an updated strategy in 2019. This was premised on two studies culminating in their recommendation that mild asthma should be treated by using a combination of a rapid and long-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Irusen, Elvis M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148058
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5104
_version_ 1783740785893572608
author Irusen, Elvis M.
author_facet Irusen, Elvis M.
author_sort Irusen, Elvis M.
collection PubMed
description Recognising that mild asthmatics are at risk of exacerbations and mortality, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) issued an updated strategy in 2019. This was premised on two studies culminating in their recommendation that mild asthma should be treated by using a combination of a rapid and long-acting beta 2 agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) administered as required. Their rationale is, however, debatable, as the studies actually showed that regular daily ICS administration was more effective for a number of asthma control endpoints. A patient-driven treatment strategy is also questionable, as there are a number of concerns about behaviour of patients suffering from asthma and perception of airway narrowing that should trigger medication intake but in fact does not do so. These deficiencies also influence a similar maintenance and reliever treatment (MART) approach that would be suboptimal. Intermittent ICS regimens are also inferior when compared to regular treatment. Not all asthmatics respond to the same dose of ICS. The best way to manage asthma is by adopting a step-up ICS approach, to encompass varying disease severity, with a long-acting beta agonist taken on a daily basis, ideally in a single combination inhaler.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8378167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83781672021-09-03 The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – A critique Irusen, Elvis M. S Afr Fam Pract (2004) Open Forum Recognising that mild asthmatics are at risk of exacerbations and mortality, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) issued an updated strategy in 2019. This was premised on two studies culminating in their recommendation that mild asthma should be treated by using a combination of a rapid and long-acting beta 2 agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) administered as required. Their rationale is, however, debatable, as the studies actually showed that regular daily ICS administration was more effective for a number of asthma control endpoints. A patient-driven treatment strategy is also questionable, as there are a number of concerns about behaviour of patients suffering from asthma and perception of airway narrowing that should trigger medication intake but in fact does not do so. These deficiencies also influence a similar maintenance and reliever treatment (MART) approach that would be suboptimal. Intermittent ICS regimens are also inferior when compared to regular treatment. Not all asthmatics respond to the same dose of ICS. The best way to manage asthma is by adopting a step-up ICS approach, to encompass varying disease severity, with a long-acting beta agonist taken on a daily basis, ideally in a single combination inhaler. AOSIS 2020-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8378167/ /pubmed/32148058 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5104 Text en © 2020. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Open Forum
Irusen, Elvis M.
The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – A critique
title The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – A critique
title_full The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – A critique
title_fullStr The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – A critique
title_full_unstemmed The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – A critique
title_short The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – A critique
title_sort global initiative for asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma – a critique
topic Open Forum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148058
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5104
work_keys_str_mv AT irusenelvism theglobalinitiativeforasthma2019recommendationformildasthmaacritique
AT irusenelvism globalinitiativeforasthma2019recommendationformildasthmaacritique