Cargando…

Evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Breaking bad news and dealing with difficult patient encounters is a skill that medical residents must learn during their curriculum. Many different tools are available to measure communication quality, but their development and validation processes are often missing. In this paper, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cusson, Olivier, Mercier, Justine, Catelin, Céline, Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049461
_version_ 1783740819470024704
author Cusson, Olivier
Mercier, Justine
Catelin, Céline
Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon
author_facet Cusson, Olivier
Mercier, Justine
Catelin, Céline
Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon
author_sort Cusson, Olivier
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Breaking bad news and dealing with difficult patient encounters is a skill that medical residents must learn during their curriculum. Many different tools are available to measure communication quality, but their development and validation processes are often missing. In this paper, we present the protocol of a systematic review aiming to identify the validated tools for measuring communication skills or communication effectiveness with parents in a paediatrics setting in general, including for difficult patient encounters. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct our systematic review in accordance with the methodology suggested by COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and will report this paper following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. We will include the studies in which authors developed and/or validated tools for assessing the quality of communication with families by residents and/or physicians during patient encounters in paediatric settings. Studies assessing communication in telemedicine and studies that use the tool to measure a different outcome than its validation will be excluded. Our search strategy will be developed by a scientific librarian and validated using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategy (PRESS) tool. Two reviewers will independently screen the studies for selection, extract data of the ones included and assess their level of risk of bias using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. We will perform a narrative synthesis on the study selection process, the characteristics of studies and study population, the characteristics of tools identified, their process of development and/or validation and their psychometric properties. If sufficient data are available, we will do quantitative analyses for each psychometric property. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval from an ethics committee is not required, as there is no primary data collection. Our findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and at local, national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020151642.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8378350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83783502021-09-02 Evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol Cusson, Olivier Mercier, Justine Catelin, Céline Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon BMJ Open Communication INTRODUCTION: Breaking bad news and dealing with difficult patient encounters is a skill that medical residents must learn during their curriculum. Many different tools are available to measure communication quality, but their development and validation processes are often missing. In this paper, we present the protocol of a systematic review aiming to identify the validated tools for measuring communication skills or communication effectiveness with parents in a paediatrics setting in general, including for difficult patient encounters. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct our systematic review in accordance with the methodology suggested by COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and will report this paper following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. We will include the studies in which authors developed and/or validated tools for assessing the quality of communication with families by residents and/or physicians during patient encounters in paediatric settings. Studies assessing communication in telemedicine and studies that use the tool to measure a different outcome than its validation will be excluded. Our search strategy will be developed by a scientific librarian and validated using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategy (PRESS) tool. Two reviewers will independently screen the studies for selection, extract data of the ones included and assess their level of risk of bias using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. We will perform a narrative synthesis on the study selection process, the characteristics of studies and study population, the characteristics of tools identified, their process of development and/or validation and their psychometric properties. If sufficient data are available, we will do quantitative analyses for each psychometric property. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval from an ethics committee is not required, as there is no primary data collection. Our findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and at local, national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020151642. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8378350/ /pubmed/34413103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049461 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Communication
Cusson, Olivier
Mercier, Justine
Catelin, Céline
Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon
Evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol
title Evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol
title_full Evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol
title_short Evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol
title_sort evaluating communication with parents in paediatric patient encounters: a systematic review protocol
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049461
work_keys_str_mv AT cussonolivier evaluatingcommunicationwithparentsinpaediatricpatientencountersasystematicreviewprotocol
AT mercierjustine evaluatingcommunicationwithparentsinpaediatricpatientencountersasystematicreviewprotocol
AT catelinceline evaluatingcommunicationwithparentsinpaediatricpatientencountersasystematicreviewprotocol
AT zomahounhervetchalavignon evaluatingcommunicationwithparentsinpaediatricpatientencountersasystematicreviewprotocol