Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the degree of conversion of four different composites polymerized using ultrafast photopolymerization technique: An in vitro study

CONTEXT: Lower degree of conversion (DC%) of monomer to polymer in a resin composite restoration could be a health hazard for the patient as well as it could affect the longevity of the restoration. AIMS: This study is aimed to compare and evaluate the DC% of four different composites polymerized us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balagopal, Sundaresan, Geethapriya, Nagarajan, Anisha, Sebatni, Hemasathya, Bahavathi Ananthan, Vandana, James, Dhatshayani, Chandrasekaran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475685
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_648_20
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Lower degree of conversion (DC%) of monomer to polymer in a resin composite restoration could be a health hazard for the patient as well as it could affect the longevity of the restoration. AIMS: This study is aimed to compare and evaluate the DC% of four different composites polymerized using ultrafast photopolymerization. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In-vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 disc-shaped composite samples were used in the study. Twenty samples were prepared for each group using 2 mm height and 6 mm diameter Tygon tube as a matrix. All of the composites were cured using the Woodpecker i Led light-curing unit with an intensity of 2300–2500 mW/cm(2) (TURBO mode). Samples in Group 1 were cured for 1 s and samples in Group 2 were cured for 3 s. Each group had 4 subgroups of five samples of the 4 resin composites tested. After photo-activation, the specimens were stored under dark dry conditions at room temperature for 24 h before testing. The DC% was measured using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The DC% were analyzed using ANOVA, and Tukey HSD post hoc test using IBM SPSS 21 software. RESULTS: Among the experimental groups, Group 2 showed a higher DC% which ranges from 93.7% to 95.4% than Group 1 which ranges from 58.5% to 65.5%. There was a statistically significant difference in the DC% among the materials tested (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, it was concluded that composites cured for 3 s showed a higher DC% which ranges from 93.7% to 95.4% than those cured for 1 s. The DC% also varied among the four different composites tested.