Cargando…
Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019
OBJECTIVES: Examine the safety and feasibility of a multimodal in-person or telehealth treatment program, administered in acute recovery phase for patients surviving critical coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: Pragmatic, pre-post, nonrandomized controlled trial with patients electing enrollment into...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000516 |
_version_ | 1783740881773264896 |
---|---|
author | Mayer, Kirby P. Parry, Selina M. Kalema, Anna G. Joshi, Rajan R. Soper, Melissa K. Steele, Angela K. Lusby, Megan L. Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E. Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A. Morris, Peter E. |
author_facet | Mayer, Kirby P. Parry, Selina M. Kalema, Anna G. Joshi, Rajan R. Soper, Melissa K. Steele, Angela K. Lusby, Megan L. Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E. Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A. Morris, Peter E. |
author_sort | Mayer, Kirby P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Examine the safety and feasibility of a multimodal in-person or telehealth treatment program, administered in acute recovery phase for patients surviving critical coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: Pragmatic, pre-post, nonrandomized controlled trial with patients electing enrollment into one of the two recovery pathways. SETTING: ICU Recovery Clinic in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients surviving acute respiratory failure due to critical coronavirus disease 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients participated in combined ICU Recovery clinic and 8 weeks of physical rehabilitation delivered: 1) in-person or 2) telehealth. Patients received medical care by an ICU Recovery Clinic interdisciplinary team and physical rehabilitation focused on aerobic, resistance, and respiratory muscle training. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-two patients enrolled with mean age 57 ± 12, 62% were male, and the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 9.5. There were no differences between the two groups except patients in telehealth pathway (n = 10) lived further from clinic than face-to-face patients (162 ± 60 vs 31 ± 47 kilometers, t = 6.06, p < 0.001). Four safety events occurred: one minor adverse event in the telehealth group, two minor adverse events, and one major adverse event in the in-person group. Three patients did not complete the study (two in-person and one telehealth). Six-minute walk distance increased to 101 ± 91 meters from pre to post (n = 29, t = 6.93, p < 0.0001), which was similar between the two groups (110 vs 80 meters, t = 1.34, p = 0.19). Self-reported levels of anxiety, depression, and distress were high in both groups with similar self-report quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal treatment program combining care from an interdisciplinary team in an ICU Recovery Clinic with physical rehabilitation is safe and feasible in patients surviving the ICU for coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8378791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83787912021-09-01 Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mayer, Kirby P. Parry, Selina M. Kalema, Anna G. Joshi, Rajan R. Soper, Melissa K. Steele, Angela K. Lusby, Megan L. Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E. Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A. Morris, Peter E. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report OBJECTIVES: Examine the safety and feasibility of a multimodal in-person or telehealth treatment program, administered in acute recovery phase for patients surviving critical coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: Pragmatic, pre-post, nonrandomized controlled trial with patients electing enrollment into one of the two recovery pathways. SETTING: ICU Recovery Clinic in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients surviving acute respiratory failure due to critical coronavirus disease 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients participated in combined ICU Recovery clinic and 8 weeks of physical rehabilitation delivered: 1) in-person or 2) telehealth. Patients received medical care by an ICU Recovery Clinic interdisciplinary team and physical rehabilitation focused on aerobic, resistance, and respiratory muscle training. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-two patients enrolled with mean age 57 ± 12, 62% were male, and the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 9.5. There were no differences between the two groups except patients in telehealth pathway (n = 10) lived further from clinic than face-to-face patients (162 ± 60 vs 31 ± 47 kilometers, t = 6.06, p < 0.001). Four safety events occurred: one minor adverse event in the telehealth group, two minor adverse events, and one major adverse event in the in-person group. Three patients did not complete the study (two in-person and one telehealth). Six-minute walk distance increased to 101 ± 91 meters from pre to post (n = 29, t = 6.93, p < 0.0001), which was similar between the two groups (110 vs 80 meters, t = 1.34, p = 0.19). Self-reported levels of anxiety, depression, and distress were high in both groups with similar self-report quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal treatment program combining care from an interdisciplinary team in an ICU Recovery Clinic with physical rehabilitation is safe and feasible in patients surviving the ICU for coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory failure. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8378791/ /pubmed/34476403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000516 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Clinical Report Mayer, Kirby P. Parry, Selina M. Kalema, Anna G. Joshi, Rajan R. Soper, Melissa K. Steele, Angela K. Lusby, Megan L. Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E. Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A. Morris, Peter E. Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
title | Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
title_full | Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
title_fullStr | Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
title_short | Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
title_sort | safety and feasibility of an interdisciplinary treatment approach to optimize recovery from critical coronavirus disease 2019 |
topic | Original Clinical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayerkirbyp safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT parryselinam safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT kalemaannag safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT joshirajanr safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT sopermelissak safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT steeleangelak safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT lusbymeganl safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT dupontversteegdenesthere safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT montgomeryyatesashleya safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 AT morrispetere safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019 |