Cargando…

Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019

OBJECTIVES: Examine the safety and feasibility of a multimodal in-person or telehealth treatment program, administered in acute recovery phase for patients surviving critical coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: Pragmatic, pre-post, nonrandomized controlled trial with patients electing enrollment into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayer, Kirby P., Parry, Selina M., Kalema, Anna G., Joshi, Rajan R., Soper, Melissa K., Steele, Angela K., Lusby, Megan L., Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E., Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A., Morris, Peter E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000516
_version_ 1783740881773264896
author Mayer, Kirby P.
Parry, Selina M.
Kalema, Anna G.
Joshi, Rajan R.
Soper, Melissa K.
Steele, Angela K.
Lusby, Megan L.
Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E.
Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A.
Morris, Peter E.
author_facet Mayer, Kirby P.
Parry, Selina M.
Kalema, Anna G.
Joshi, Rajan R.
Soper, Melissa K.
Steele, Angela K.
Lusby, Megan L.
Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E.
Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A.
Morris, Peter E.
author_sort Mayer, Kirby P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Examine the safety and feasibility of a multimodal in-person or telehealth treatment program, administered in acute recovery phase for patients surviving critical coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: Pragmatic, pre-post, nonrandomized controlled trial with patients electing enrollment into one of the two recovery pathways. SETTING: ICU Recovery Clinic in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients surviving acute respiratory failure due to critical coronavirus disease 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients participated in combined ICU Recovery clinic and 8 weeks of physical rehabilitation delivered: 1) in-person or 2) telehealth. Patients received medical care by an ICU Recovery Clinic interdisciplinary team and physical rehabilitation focused on aerobic, resistance, and respiratory muscle training. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-two patients enrolled with mean age 57 ± 12, 62% were male, and the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 9.5. There were no differences between the two groups except patients in telehealth pathway (n = 10) lived further from clinic than face-to-face patients (162 ± 60 vs 31 ± 47 kilometers, t = 6.06, p < 0.001). Four safety events occurred: one minor adverse event in the telehealth group, two minor adverse events, and one major adverse event in the in-person group. Three patients did not complete the study (two in-person and one telehealth). Six-minute walk distance increased to 101 ± 91 meters from pre to post (n = 29, t = 6.93, p < 0.0001), which was similar between the two groups (110 vs 80 meters, t = 1.34, p = 0.19). Self-reported levels of anxiety, depression, and distress were high in both groups with similar self-report quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal treatment program combining care from an interdisciplinary team in an ICU Recovery Clinic with physical rehabilitation is safe and feasible in patients surviving the ICU for coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8378791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83787912021-09-01 Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mayer, Kirby P. Parry, Selina M. Kalema, Anna G. Joshi, Rajan R. Soper, Melissa K. Steele, Angela K. Lusby, Megan L. Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E. Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A. Morris, Peter E. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report OBJECTIVES: Examine the safety and feasibility of a multimodal in-person or telehealth treatment program, administered in acute recovery phase for patients surviving critical coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: Pragmatic, pre-post, nonrandomized controlled trial with patients electing enrollment into one of the two recovery pathways. SETTING: ICU Recovery Clinic in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients surviving acute respiratory failure due to critical coronavirus disease 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients participated in combined ICU Recovery clinic and 8 weeks of physical rehabilitation delivered: 1) in-person or 2) telehealth. Patients received medical care by an ICU Recovery Clinic interdisciplinary team and physical rehabilitation focused on aerobic, resistance, and respiratory muscle training. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-two patients enrolled with mean age 57 ± 12, 62% were male, and the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 9.5. There were no differences between the two groups except patients in telehealth pathway (n = 10) lived further from clinic than face-to-face patients (162 ± 60 vs 31 ± 47 kilometers, t = 6.06, p < 0.001). Four safety events occurred: one minor adverse event in the telehealth group, two minor adverse events, and one major adverse event in the in-person group. Three patients did not complete the study (two in-person and one telehealth). Six-minute walk distance increased to 101 ± 91 meters from pre to post (n = 29, t = 6.93, p < 0.0001), which was similar between the two groups (110 vs 80 meters, t = 1.34, p = 0.19). Self-reported levels of anxiety, depression, and distress were high in both groups with similar self-report quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal treatment program combining care from an interdisciplinary team in an ICU Recovery Clinic with physical rehabilitation is safe and feasible in patients surviving the ICU for coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory failure. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8378791/ /pubmed/34476403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000516 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Report
Mayer, Kirby P.
Parry, Selina M.
Kalema, Anna G.
Joshi, Rajan R.
Soper, Melissa K.
Steele, Angela K.
Lusby, Megan L.
Dupont-Versteegden, Esther E.
Montgomery-Yates, Ashley A.
Morris, Peter E.
Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019
title Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019
title_full Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019
title_fullStr Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019
title_short Safety and Feasibility of an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach to Optimize Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019
title_sort safety and feasibility of an interdisciplinary treatment approach to optimize recovery from critical coronavirus disease 2019
topic Original Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000516
work_keys_str_mv AT mayerkirbyp safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT parryselinam safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT kalemaannag safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT joshirajanr safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT sopermelissak safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT steeleangelak safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT lusbymeganl safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT dupontversteegdenesthere safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT montgomeryyatesashleya safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019
AT morrispetere safetyandfeasibilityofaninterdisciplinarytreatmentapproachtooptimizerecoveryfromcriticalcoronavirusdisease2019