Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Bandage Contact Lenses and Eye Patching after Bilateral Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE: To comparatively evaluate the safety and satisfaction of bandage contact lens (BCL) and eye patching in patients after cataract surgery. METHODS: Sixteen (32 eyes) patients who planned to undergo bilateral cataract surgery were recruited. The two eyes of each patient were randomly divided i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jing, Dalan, Deng, Aihua, Wang, Hongmei, Chou, Yilin, Jiang, Xiaodan, Chen, Zhenxiang, Li, Xuemin, Wen, Tingyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2873543
_version_ 1783740906377052160
author Jing, Dalan
Deng, Aihua
Wang, Hongmei
Chou, Yilin
Jiang, Xiaodan
Chen, Zhenxiang
Li, Xuemin
Wen, Tingyi
author_facet Jing, Dalan
Deng, Aihua
Wang, Hongmei
Chou, Yilin
Jiang, Xiaodan
Chen, Zhenxiang
Li, Xuemin
Wen, Tingyi
author_sort Jing, Dalan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To comparatively evaluate the safety and satisfaction of bandage contact lens (BCL) and eye patching in patients after cataract surgery. METHODS: Sixteen (32 eyes) patients who planned to undergo bilateral cataract surgery were recruited. The two eyes of each patient were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A and Group B were instructed to wear BCLs immediately at the end of the surgery until one week and eye patch immediately after surgery until one day, respectively. Visual analog scales of ten specific symptoms, Visual Function Index (VF-14) questionnaire, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were conducted on the first day before the surgery and Day 1 and Day 7 after surgery. Oculus keratography was conducted on the first day before surgery and on Day 7. Patient satisfaction was determined on Day 1. Moreover, bacterial species in the conjunctival sac, meibomian gland secretions, and BCLs were subsequently identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: The patient satisfaction scores of Group A were higher than Group B. Group A were more motivated to choose the same treatment and were more likely to recommend BCLs to others. No statistically significant differences were found in bacterial culture positivity between the groups. The differences in ocular signs and symptoms between the two groups were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the BCVA and VF-14 between the groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: BCLs could be safely and effectively used in patients after cataract surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8378946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83789462021-08-21 Comparative Evaluation of Bandage Contact Lenses and Eye Patching after Bilateral Cataract Surgery Jing, Dalan Deng, Aihua Wang, Hongmei Chou, Yilin Jiang, Xiaodan Chen, Zhenxiang Li, Xuemin Wen, Tingyi J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To comparatively evaluate the safety and satisfaction of bandage contact lens (BCL) and eye patching in patients after cataract surgery. METHODS: Sixteen (32 eyes) patients who planned to undergo bilateral cataract surgery were recruited. The two eyes of each patient were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A and Group B were instructed to wear BCLs immediately at the end of the surgery until one week and eye patch immediately after surgery until one day, respectively. Visual analog scales of ten specific symptoms, Visual Function Index (VF-14) questionnaire, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were conducted on the first day before the surgery and Day 1 and Day 7 after surgery. Oculus keratography was conducted on the first day before surgery and on Day 7. Patient satisfaction was determined on Day 1. Moreover, bacterial species in the conjunctival sac, meibomian gland secretions, and BCLs were subsequently identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: The patient satisfaction scores of Group A were higher than Group B. Group A were more motivated to choose the same treatment and were more likely to recommend BCLs to others. No statistically significant differences were found in bacterial culture positivity between the groups. The differences in ocular signs and symptoms between the two groups were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the BCVA and VF-14 between the groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: BCLs could be safely and effectively used in patients after cataract surgery. Hindawi 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8378946/ /pubmed/34422403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2873543 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dalan Jing et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jing, Dalan
Deng, Aihua
Wang, Hongmei
Chou, Yilin
Jiang, Xiaodan
Chen, Zhenxiang
Li, Xuemin
Wen, Tingyi
Comparative Evaluation of Bandage Contact Lenses and Eye Patching after Bilateral Cataract Surgery
title Comparative Evaluation of Bandage Contact Lenses and Eye Patching after Bilateral Cataract Surgery
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Bandage Contact Lenses and Eye Patching after Bilateral Cataract Surgery
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Bandage Contact Lenses and Eye Patching after Bilateral Cataract Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Bandage Contact Lenses and Eye Patching after Bilateral Cataract Surgery
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Bandage Contact Lenses and Eye Patching after Bilateral Cataract Surgery
title_sort comparative evaluation of bandage contact lenses and eye patching after bilateral cataract surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2873543
work_keys_str_mv AT jingdalan comparativeevaluationofbandagecontactlensesandeyepatchingafterbilateralcataractsurgery
AT dengaihua comparativeevaluationofbandagecontactlensesandeyepatchingafterbilateralcataractsurgery
AT wanghongmei comparativeevaluationofbandagecontactlensesandeyepatchingafterbilateralcataractsurgery
AT chouyilin comparativeevaluationofbandagecontactlensesandeyepatchingafterbilateralcataractsurgery
AT jiangxiaodan comparativeevaluationofbandagecontactlensesandeyepatchingafterbilateralcataractsurgery
AT chenzhenxiang comparativeevaluationofbandagecontactlensesandeyepatchingafterbilateralcataractsurgery
AT lixuemin comparativeevaluationofbandagecontactlensesandeyepatchingafterbilateralcataractsurgery
AT wentingyi comparativeevaluationofbandagecontactlensesandeyepatchingafterbilateralcataractsurgery