Cargando…
Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models
Researchers have been working with different models to forecast COVID-19 cases. Many of their estimates are not accurate. This study aims to propose the best model to forecast COVID-19 cumulative cases using a machine learning technic. It is a work that focused on time series univariate models becau...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379085/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.028 |
_version_ | 1783740937621471232 |
---|---|
author | Atchadé, Mintodê Nicodème Sokadjo, Yves Morel |
author_facet | Atchadé, Mintodê Nicodème Sokadjo, Yves Morel |
author_sort | Atchadé, Mintodê Nicodème |
collection | PubMed |
description | Researchers have been working with different models to forecast COVID-19 cases. Many of their estimates are not accurate. This study aims to propose the best model to forecast COVID-19 cumulative cases using a machine learning technic. It is a work that focused on time series univariate models because there are too many debates about the quality of the pandemic data. To increase the likelihood of the findings, we avoided many variables modeling and proposed a robust process to forecast COVID-19 cumulative cases. It will help international institutions to take optimal decisions about the world economy and response to the pandemic. Consequently, we used the data titled “Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)” from “Our World in Data” about cases from 22 January 2020 to 30 November 2020. We computed Error Trend Season (ETS), Exponential smoothing with multiplicative error-trend, and ARIMA on the training data sets. In addition, we calculated the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) per model. Among those models, we notice that ETS (with additive error-trend and no season) has the smallest MAPE statistics compared to the others. The findings revealed that with the ETS model we need at least 100 days to have good forecasts with a MAPE threshold of 1%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8379085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83790852021-08-23 Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models Atchadé, Mintodê Nicodème Sokadjo, Yves Morel Alexandria Engineering Journal Article Researchers have been working with different models to forecast COVID-19 cases. Many of their estimates are not accurate. This study aims to propose the best model to forecast COVID-19 cumulative cases using a machine learning technic. It is a work that focused on time series univariate models because there are too many debates about the quality of the pandemic data. To increase the likelihood of the findings, we avoided many variables modeling and proposed a robust process to forecast COVID-19 cumulative cases. It will help international institutions to take optimal decisions about the world economy and response to the pandemic. Consequently, we used the data titled “Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)” from “Our World in Data” about cases from 22 January 2020 to 30 November 2020. We computed Error Trend Season (ETS), Exponential smoothing with multiplicative error-trend, and ARIMA on the training data sets. In addition, we calculated the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) per model. Among those models, we notice that ETS (with additive error-trend and no season) has the smallest MAPE statistics compared to the others. The findings revealed that with the ETS model we need at least 100 days to have good forecasts with a MAPE threshold of 1%. THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. 2022-04 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8379085/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.028 Text en © 2021 Alexandria University Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Atchadé, Mintodê Nicodème Sokadjo, Yves Morel Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models |
title | Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models |
title_full | Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models |
title_fullStr | Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models |
title_full_unstemmed | Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models |
title_short | Overview and cross-validation of COVID-19 forecasting univariate models |
title_sort | overview and cross-validation of covid-19 forecasting univariate models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379085/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atchademintodenicodeme overviewandcrossvalidationofcovid19forecastingunivariatemodels AT sokadjoyvesmorel overviewandcrossvalidationofcovid19forecastingunivariatemodels |