Cargando…
Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the periablational 3D safety margin in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) referred for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and to evaluate its influence on local treatment success. METHODS: Forty-five patients (31 males; mean age 64.5 [range...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x |
_version_ | 1783740942653587456 |
---|---|
author | Laimer, Gregor Jaschke, Nikolai Schullian, Peter Putzer, Daniel Eberle, Gernot Solbiati, Marco Solbiati, Luigi Goldberg, S. Nahum Bale, Reto |
author_facet | Laimer, Gregor Jaschke, Nikolai Schullian, Peter Putzer, Daniel Eberle, Gernot Solbiati, Marco Solbiati, Luigi Goldberg, S. Nahum Bale, Reto |
author_sort | Laimer, Gregor |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the periablational 3D safety margin in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) referred for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and to evaluate its influence on local treatment success. METHODS: Forty-five patients (31 males; mean age 64.5 [range 31–87 years]) with 76 CRLM were treated with stereotactic RFA and retrospectively analyzed. Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional contrast-enhanced CT scans using a non-rigid registration software enabled a retrospective assessment of the percentage of predetermined periablational 3D safety margin and CRLM successfully ablated. Periablational safety zones (1–10 mm) and percentage of periablational zone ablated were calculated, analyzed, and compared with subsequent tumor growth to determine an optimal safety margin predictive of local treatment success. RESULTS: Mean overall follow-up was 36.1 ± 18.5 months. Nine of 76 CRLMs (11.8%) developed local tumor progression (LTP) with mean time to LTP of 18.3 ± 11.9 months. Overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP-free survival rates were 98.7%, 90.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. The periablational safety margin assessment proved to be the only independent predictor (p < 0.001) of LTP for all calculated safety margins. The smallest safety margin 100% ablated displaying no LTP was 3 mm, and at least 90% of a 6-mm circumscribed 3D safety margin was required to achieve complete ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success in patients with CRLM referred to stereotactic RFA. Ablations achieving 100% 3D safety margin of 3 mm and at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can predict treatment success. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success following thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. • Ablations with 100% 3D periablational safety margin of 3 mm and ablations with at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can be considered indications of treatment success. • Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional CT scans with the software used in this study is feasible and could represent a useful tool in daily clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8379110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83791102021-09-02 Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases Laimer, Gregor Jaschke, Nikolai Schullian, Peter Putzer, Daniel Eberle, Gernot Solbiati, Marco Solbiati, Luigi Goldberg, S. Nahum Bale, Reto Eur Radiol Interventional OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the periablational 3D safety margin in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) referred for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and to evaluate its influence on local treatment success. METHODS: Forty-five patients (31 males; mean age 64.5 [range 31–87 years]) with 76 CRLM were treated with stereotactic RFA and retrospectively analyzed. Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional contrast-enhanced CT scans using a non-rigid registration software enabled a retrospective assessment of the percentage of predetermined periablational 3D safety margin and CRLM successfully ablated. Periablational safety zones (1–10 mm) and percentage of periablational zone ablated were calculated, analyzed, and compared with subsequent tumor growth to determine an optimal safety margin predictive of local treatment success. RESULTS: Mean overall follow-up was 36.1 ± 18.5 months. Nine of 76 CRLMs (11.8%) developed local tumor progression (LTP) with mean time to LTP of 18.3 ± 11.9 months. Overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP-free survival rates were 98.7%, 90.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. The periablational safety margin assessment proved to be the only independent predictor (p < 0.001) of LTP for all calculated safety margins. The smallest safety margin 100% ablated displaying no LTP was 3 mm, and at least 90% of a 6-mm circumscribed 3D safety margin was required to achieve complete ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success in patients with CRLM referred to stereotactic RFA. Ablations achieving 100% 3D safety margin of 3 mm and at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can predict treatment success. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success following thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. • Ablations with 100% 3D periablational safety margin of 3 mm and ablations with at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can be considered indications of treatment success. • Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional CT scans with the software used in this study is feasible and could represent a useful tool in daily clinical practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8379110/ /pubmed/33447860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Interventional Laimer, Gregor Jaschke, Nikolai Schullian, Peter Putzer, Daniel Eberle, Gernot Solbiati, Marco Solbiati, Luigi Goldberg, S. Nahum Bale, Reto Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases |
title | Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases |
title_full | Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases |
title_fullStr | Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases |
title_short | Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases |
title_sort | volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases |
topic | Interventional |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laimergregor volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases AT jaschkenikolai volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases AT schullianpeter volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases AT putzerdaniel volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases AT eberlegernot volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases AT solbiatimarco volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases AT solbiatiluigi volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases AT goldbergsnahum volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases AT balereto volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases |