Cargando…

Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the periablational 3D safety margin in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) referred for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and to evaluate its influence on local treatment success. METHODS: Forty-five patients (31 males; mean age 64.5 [range...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laimer, Gregor, Jaschke, Nikolai, Schullian, Peter, Putzer, Daniel, Eberle, Gernot, Solbiati, Marco, Solbiati, Luigi, Goldberg, S. Nahum, Bale, Reto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x
_version_ 1783740942653587456
author Laimer, Gregor
Jaschke, Nikolai
Schullian, Peter
Putzer, Daniel
Eberle, Gernot
Solbiati, Marco
Solbiati, Luigi
Goldberg, S. Nahum
Bale, Reto
author_facet Laimer, Gregor
Jaschke, Nikolai
Schullian, Peter
Putzer, Daniel
Eberle, Gernot
Solbiati, Marco
Solbiati, Luigi
Goldberg, S. Nahum
Bale, Reto
author_sort Laimer, Gregor
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the periablational 3D safety margin in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) referred for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and to evaluate its influence on local treatment success. METHODS: Forty-five patients (31 males; mean age 64.5 [range 31–87 years]) with 76 CRLM were treated with stereotactic RFA and retrospectively analyzed. Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional contrast-enhanced CT scans using a non-rigid registration software enabled a retrospective assessment of the percentage of predetermined periablational 3D safety margin and CRLM successfully ablated. Periablational safety zones (1–10 mm) and percentage of periablational zone ablated were calculated, analyzed, and compared with subsequent tumor growth to determine an optimal safety margin predictive of local treatment success. RESULTS: Mean overall follow-up was 36.1 ± 18.5 months. Nine of 76 CRLMs (11.8%) developed local tumor progression (LTP) with mean time to LTP of 18.3 ± 11.9 months. Overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP-free survival rates were 98.7%, 90.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. The periablational safety margin assessment proved to be the only independent predictor (p < 0.001) of LTP for all calculated safety margins. The smallest safety margin 100% ablated displaying no LTP was 3 mm, and at least 90% of a 6-mm circumscribed 3D safety margin was required to achieve complete ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success in patients with CRLM referred to stereotactic RFA. Ablations achieving 100% 3D safety margin of 3 mm and at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can predict treatment success. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success following thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. • Ablations with 100% 3D periablational safety margin of 3 mm and ablations with at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can be considered indications of treatment success. • Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional CT scans with the software used in this study is feasible and could represent a useful tool in daily clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83791102021-09-02 Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases Laimer, Gregor Jaschke, Nikolai Schullian, Peter Putzer, Daniel Eberle, Gernot Solbiati, Marco Solbiati, Luigi Goldberg, S. Nahum Bale, Reto Eur Radiol Interventional OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the periablational 3D safety margin in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) referred for stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and to evaluate its influence on local treatment success. METHODS: Forty-five patients (31 males; mean age 64.5 [range 31–87 years]) with 76 CRLM were treated with stereotactic RFA and retrospectively analyzed. Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional contrast-enhanced CT scans using a non-rigid registration software enabled a retrospective assessment of the percentage of predetermined periablational 3D safety margin and CRLM successfully ablated. Periablational safety zones (1–10 mm) and percentage of periablational zone ablated were calculated, analyzed, and compared with subsequent tumor growth to determine an optimal safety margin predictive of local treatment success. RESULTS: Mean overall follow-up was 36.1 ± 18.5 months. Nine of 76 CRLMs (11.8%) developed local tumor progression (LTP) with mean time to LTP of 18.3 ± 11.9 months. Overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP-free survival rates were 98.7%, 90.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. The periablational safety margin assessment proved to be the only independent predictor (p < 0.001) of LTP for all calculated safety margins. The smallest safety margin 100% ablated displaying no LTP was 3 mm, and at least 90% of a 6-mm circumscribed 3D safety margin was required to achieve complete ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success in patients with CRLM referred to stereotactic RFA. Ablations achieving 100% 3D safety margin of 3 mm and at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can predict treatment success. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin can be used as an intraprocedural tool to evaluate local treatment success following thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. • Ablations with 100% 3D periablational safety margin of 3 mm and ablations with at least 90% 3D safety margin of 6 mm can be considered indications of treatment success. • Image fusion of pre- and post-interventional CT scans with the software used in this study is feasible and could represent a useful tool in daily clinical practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8379110/ /pubmed/33447860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Interventional
Laimer, Gregor
Jaschke, Nikolai
Schullian, Peter
Putzer, Daniel
Eberle, Gernot
Solbiati, Marco
Solbiati, Luigi
Goldberg, S. Nahum
Bale, Reto
Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases
title Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases
title_full Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases
title_fullStr Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases
title_short Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases
title_sort volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases
topic Interventional
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x
work_keys_str_mv AT laimergregor volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases
AT jaschkenikolai volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases
AT schullianpeter volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases
AT putzerdaniel volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases
AT eberlegernot volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases
AT solbiatimarco volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases
AT solbiatiluigi volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases
AT goldbergsnahum volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases
AT balereto volumetricassessmentoftheperiablationalsafetymarginafterthermalablationofcolorectallivermetastases