Cargando…

Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform

Airborne LiDAR bathymetry offers low cost and high mobility, making it an ideal option for shallow-water measurements. However, due to differences in the measurement environment and the laser emission channel, the received waveform is difficult to extract using a single algorithm. The choice of a su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Yue, Li, Houpu, Zhai, Guojun, He, Yan, Bian, Shaofeng, Zhou, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96551-w
_version_ 1783740967898054656
author Song, Yue
Li, Houpu
Zhai, Guojun
He, Yan
Bian, Shaofeng
Zhou, Wei
author_facet Song, Yue
Li, Houpu
Zhai, Guojun
He, Yan
Bian, Shaofeng
Zhou, Wei
author_sort Song, Yue
collection PubMed
description Airborne LiDAR bathymetry offers low cost and high mobility, making it an ideal option for shallow-water measurements. However, due to differences in the measurement environment and the laser emission channel, the received waveform is difficult to extract using a single algorithm. The choice of a suitable waveform processing method is thus of extreme importance to guarantee the accuracy of the bathymetric retrieval. In this study, we use a wavelet-denoising method to denoise the received waveform and subsequently test four algorithms for denoised-waveform processing, namely, the Richardson–Lucy deconvolution (RLD), blind deconvolution (BD), Wiener filter deconvolution (WFD), and constrained least-squares filter deconvolution (RFD). The simulation and measured multichannel databases are used to evaluate the algorithms, with focus on improving their performance after data-denoising and their capability of extracting water depth. Results show that applying wavelet denoising before deconvolution improves the extraction accuracy. The four algorithms perform better for the shallow-water orthogonal polarization channel (PMT2) than for the shallow horizontal row polarization channel (PMT1). Of the four algorithms, RLD provides the best signal-detection rate, and RFD is the most robust; BD has low computational efficiency, and WFD performs poorly in deep water (< 25 m).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83792362021-08-27 Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform Song, Yue Li, Houpu Zhai, Guojun He, Yan Bian, Shaofeng Zhou, Wei Sci Rep Article Airborne LiDAR bathymetry offers low cost and high mobility, making it an ideal option for shallow-water measurements. However, due to differences in the measurement environment and the laser emission channel, the received waveform is difficult to extract using a single algorithm. The choice of a suitable waveform processing method is thus of extreme importance to guarantee the accuracy of the bathymetric retrieval. In this study, we use a wavelet-denoising method to denoise the received waveform and subsequently test four algorithms for denoised-waveform processing, namely, the Richardson–Lucy deconvolution (RLD), blind deconvolution (BD), Wiener filter deconvolution (WFD), and constrained least-squares filter deconvolution (RFD). The simulation and measured multichannel databases are used to evaluate the algorithms, with focus on improving their performance after data-denoising and their capability of extracting water depth. Results show that applying wavelet denoising before deconvolution improves the extraction accuracy. The four algorithms perform better for the shallow-water orthogonal polarization channel (PMT2) than for the shallow horizontal row polarization channel (PMT1). Of the four algorithms, RLD provides the best signal-detection rate, and RFD is the most robust; BD has low computational efficiency, and WFD performs poorly in deep water (< 25 m). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8379236/ /pubmed/34417543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96551-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Song, Yue
Li, Houpu
Zhai, Guojun
He, Yan
Bian, Shaofeng
Zhou, Wei
Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform
title Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform
title_full Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform
title_fullStr Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform
title_short Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform
title_sort comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne lidar bathymetry based on wavelet transform
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96551-w
work_keys_str_mv AT songyue comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform
AT lihoupu comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform
AT zhaiguojun comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform
AT heyan comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform
AT bianshaofeng comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform
AT zhouwei comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform