Cargando…
Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform
Airborne LiDAR bathymetry offers low cost and high mobility, making it an ideal option for shallow-water measurements. However, due to differences in the measurement environment and the laser emission channel, the received waveform is difficult to extract using a single algorithm. The choice of a su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96551-w |
_version_ | 1783740967898054656 |
---|---|
author | Song, Yue Li, Houpu Zhai, Guojun He, Yan Bian, Shaofeng Zhou, Wei |
author_facet | Song, Yue Li, Houpu Zhai, Guojun He, Yan Bian, Shaofeng Zhou, Wei |
author_sort | Song, Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | Airborne LiDAR bathymetry offers low cost and high mobility, making it an ideal option for shallow-water measurements. However, due to differences in the measurement environment and the laser emission channel, the received waveform is difficult to extract using a single algorithm. The choice of a suitable waveform processing method is thus of extreme importance to guarantee the accuracy of the bathymetric retrieval. In this study, we use a wavelet-denoising method to denoise the received waveform and subsequently test four algorithms for denoised-waveform processing, namely, the Richardson–Lucy deconvolution (RLD), blind deconvolution (BD), Wiener filter deconvolution (WFD), and constrained least-squares filter deconvolution (RFD). The simulation and measured multichannel databases are used to evaluate the algorithms, with focus on improving their performance after data-denoising and their capability of extracting water depth. Results show that applying wavelet denoising before deconvolution improves the extraction accuracy. The four algorithms perform better for the shallow-water orthogonal polarization channel (PMT2) than for the shallow horizontal row polarization channel (PMT1). Of the four algorithms, RLD provides the best signal-detection rate, and RFD is the most robust; BD has low computational efficiency, and WFD performs poorly in deep water (< 25 m). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8379236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83792362021-08-27 Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform Song, Yue Li, Houpu Zhai, Guojun He, Yan Bian, Shaofeng Zhou, Wei Sci Rep Article Airborne LiDAR bathymetry offers low cost and high mobility, making it an ideal option for shallow-water measurements. However, due to differences in the measurement environment and the laser emission channel, the received waveform is difficult to extract using a single algorithm. The choice of a suitable waveform processing method is thus of extreme importance to guarantee the accuracy of the bathymetric retrieval. In this study, we use a wavelet-denoising method to denoise the received waveform and subsequently test four algorithms for denoised-waveform processing, namely, the Richardson–Lucy deconvolution (RLD), blind deconvolution (BD), Wiener filter deconvolution (WFD), and constrained least-squares filter deconvolution (RFD). The simulation and measured multichannel databases are used to evaluate the algorithms, with focus on improving their performance after data-denoising and their capability of extracting water depth. Results show that applying wavelet denoising before deconvolution improves the extraction accuracy. The four algorithms perform better for the shallow-water orthogonal polarization channel (PMT2) than for the shallow horizontal row polarization channel (PMT1). Of the four algorithms, RLD provides the best signal-detection rate, and RFD is the most robust; BD has low computational efficiency, and WFD performs poorly in deep water (< 25 m). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8379236/ /pubmed/34417543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96551-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Song, Yue Li, Houpu Zhai, Guojun He, Yan Bian, Shaofeng Zhou, Wei Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform |
title | Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform |
title_full | Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform |
title_fullStr | Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform |
title_short | Comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne LiDAR bathymetry based on wavelet transform |
title_sort | comparison of multichannel signal deconvolution algorithms in airborne lidar bathymetry based on wavelet transform |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96551-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songyue comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform AT lihoupu comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform AT zhaiguojun comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform AT heyan comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform AT bianshaofeng comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform AT zhouwei comparisonofmultichannelsignaldeconvolutionalgorithmsinairbornelidarbathymetrybasedonwavelettransform |