Cargando…

Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: A 10-year single center experience

BACKGROUND: Hepatic hemangiomas are the most typical benign mesenchymal lesions of the liver. Most of these lesions are asymptomatic. Giant hepatic hemangiomas (GHH) (>10 cm) are often symptomatic and require surgical intervention. This study aimed to describe the clinical findings, risk factors,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farhat, Waad, Ammar, Houssem, Said, Mohamed Amine, Mizouni, Abdelkader, Ghabry, Linda, Hammami, Eya, Gupta, Rahul, Habiba ben hamada, Mabrouk, Mohamed ben, Ali, Ali ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34457247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102542
_version_ 1783741005280837632
author Farhat, Waad
Ammar, Houssem
Said, Mohamed Amine
Mizouni, Abdelkader
Ghabry, Linda
Hammami, Eya
Gupta, Rahul
Habiba ben hamada
Mabrouk, Mohamed ben
Ali, Ali ben
author_facet Farhat, Waad
Ammar, Houssem
Said, Mohamed Amine
Mizouni, Abdelkader
Ghabry, Linda
Hammami, Eya
Gupta, Rahul
Habiba ben hamada
Mabrouk, Mohamed ben
Ali, Ali ben
author_sort Farhat, Waad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatic hemangiomas are the most typical benign mesenchymal lesions of the liver. Most of these lesions are asymptomatic. Giant hepatic hemangiomas (GHH) (>10 cm) are often symptomatic and require surgical intervention. This study aimed to describe the clinical findings, risk factors, diagnostic approach and management of GHH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with GHH treated at our hospital from January 2008 to December 2018. The medical records of each patient were reviewed to obtain the clinical and surgical data. RESULTS: Twelve patients with GHH were treated during the study period. 9 were female and 3 were male. The mean age of diagnosis was 48,2 years. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain. Eight patients presented an abdominal mass. Indications for surgical resections were rupture (n = 2), Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (n = 1) and abdominal pain (n = 9). Right hepatectomy was done in four patients, left lobectomy in four patients, and enucleation in four patients. Embolization was performed in 4 patients, but due to the persistence of symptoms or bleeding, surgery was indicated. The mean operative time was 3.5 h, and median blood loss was 870 ml. The median hospital stay was 5.3 days. For four patients, we registered postoperative complications causing death in one case. All alive patients were asymptomatic at a median follow-up of 55 months. CONCLUSION: Despite limitations and alternative modalities, surgery remains the only effective curative treatment for GHH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83794322021-08-26 Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: A 10-year single center experience Farhat, Waad Ammar, Houssem Said, Mohamed Amine Mizouni, Abdelkader Ghabry, Linda Hammami, Eya Gupta, Rahul Habiba ben hamada Mabrouk, Mohamed ben Ali, Ali ben Ann Med Surg (Lond) Case Series BACKGROUND: Hepatic hemangiomas are the most typical benign mesenchymal lesions of the liver. Most of these lesions are asymptomatic. Giant hepatic hemangiomas (GHH) (>10 cm) are often symptomatic and require surgical intervention. This study aimed to describe the clinical findings, risk factors, diagnostic approach and management of GHH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with GHH treated at our hospital from January 2008 to December 2018. The medical records of each patient were reviewed to obtain the clinical and surgical data. RESULTS: Twelve patients with GHH were treated during the study period. 9 were female and 3 were male. The mean age of diagnosis was 48,2 years. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain. Eight patients presented an abdominal mass. Indications for surgical resections were rupture (n = 2), Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (n = 1) and abdominal pain (n = 9). Right hepatectomy was done in four patients, left lobectomy in four patients, and enucleation in four patients. Embolization was performed in 4 patients, but due to the persistence of symptoms or bleeding, surgery was indicated. The mean operative time was 3.5 h, and median blood loss was 870 ml. The median hospital stay was 5.3 days. For four patients, we registered postoperative complications causing death in one case. All alive patients were asymptomatic at a median follow-up of 55 months. CONCLUSION: Despite limitations and alternative modalities, surgery remains the only effective curative treatment for GHH. Elsevier 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8379432/ /pubmed/34457247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102542 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Farhat, Waad
Ammar, Houssem
Said, Mohamed Amine
Mizouni, Abdelkader
Ghabry, Linda
Hammami, Eya
Gupta, Rahul
Habiba ben hamada
Mabrouk, Mohamed ben
Ali, Ali ben
Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: A 10-year single center experience
title Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: A 10-year single center experience
title_full Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: A 10-year single center experience
title_fullStr Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: A 10-year single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: A 10-year single center experience
title_short Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: A 10-year single center experience
title_sort surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: a 10-year single center experience
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34457247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102542
work_keys_str_mv AT farhatwaad surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT ammarhoussem surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT saidmohamedamine surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT mizouniabdelkader surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT ghabrylinda surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT hammamieya surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT guptarahul surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT habibabenhamada surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT mabroukmohamedben surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience
AT alialiben surgicalmanagementofgianthepatichemangiomaa10yearsinglecenterexperience