Cargando…

Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics

OBJECTIVES: This study explored midwives' and Jordanian and Syrian women's perceptions towards family planning (FP) counseling and the process of FP decision making mechanism to provide evidence for expanding the access and improving the quality and utilization of FP services in Jordan. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Sheyab, Nihaya A., Al Nsour, Mohannad, Khader, Yousef S., Yousif, Hind, Alyahya, Mohammad S., Taha, Hana, Bardus, Marco, Al Kattan, Malika, Amiri, Mirwais
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07810
_version_ 1783741011500990464
author Al-Sheyab, Nihaya A.
Al Nsour, Mohannad
Khader, Yousef S.
Yousif, Hind
Alyahya, Mohammad S.
Taha, Hana
Bardus, Marco
Al Kattan, Malika
Amiri, Mirwais
author_facet Al-Sheyab, Nihaya A.
Al Nsour, Mohannad
Khader, Yousef S.
Yousif, Hind
Alyahya, Mohammad S.
Taha, Hana
Bardus, Marco
Al Kattan, Malika
Amiri, Mirwais
author_sort Al-Sheyab, Nihaya A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study explored midwives' and Jordanian and Syrian women's perceptions towards family planning (FP) counseling and the process of FP decision making mechanism to provide evidence for expanding the access and improving the quality and utilization of FP services in Jordan. METHODS: Explorative qualitative study that purposively recruited 24 women for 4 focus group discussions (FDGs) and 17 midwives for in-depth interviews from two governorates in Jordan. The transcribed narratives were subjected to deductive content analysis. RESULTS: Two themes were extracted from the narratives: The power dynamics in FP decision-making process and the barriers and motivators of FP decision making. The first theme was built on the perceived influence of gender equity and social pressures and gender-based violence on FP decision making. The second theme was constructed on the respondents' beliefs about reproductive health including FP as a human right and their perceptions of the obstacles and facilitators of FP Decision Making. Overall, husbands have an influential role, and perhaps the final say, in deciding whether to use FP services or not as well as the type of method to use. However, wives must initiate the family planning conversation with her husband and do so in a way that will be pleasing to the husband. Whether the husband agrees with the wife's idea to use family planning and gives her permission and funds for use, depends largely on her presentation of the idea, her husband's education level, and his personality. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed several relevant issues that play a role in Jordanian and Syrian women's decision to seek FP services. While cultural and social norms related to family planning and decision making continue to exert pressure on women, women have a deep interest in continuing to broaden their knowledge about family planning services. Engaging men and incorporating digital technology in family planning counselling has the potential to improve shared FP decision-making process among Jordanian couples and overcome some of the barriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83794522021-08-26 Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics Al-Sheyab, Nihaya A. Al Nsour, Mohannad Khader, Yousef S. Yousif, Hind Alyahya, Mohammad S. Taha, Hana Bardus, Marco Al Kattan, Malika Amiri, Mirwais Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study explored midwives' and Jordanian and Syrian women's perceptions towards family planning (FP) counseling and the process of FP decision making mechanism to provide evidence for expanding the access and improving the quality and utilization of FP services in Jordan. METHODS: Explorative qualitative study that purposively recruited 24 women for 4 focus group discussions (FDGs) and 17 midwives for in-depth interviews from two governorates in Jordan. The transcribed narratives were subjected to deductive content analysis. RESULTS: Two themes were extracted from the narratives: The power dynamics in FP decision-making process and the barriers and motivators of FP decision making. The first theme was built on the perceived influence of gender equity and social pressures and gender-based violence on FP decision making. The second theme was constructed on the respondents' beliefs about reproductive health including FP as a human right and their perceptions of the obstacles and facilitators of FP Decision Making. Overall, husbands have an influential role, and perhaps the final say, in deciding whether to use FP services or not as well as the type of method to use. However, wives must initiate the family planning conversation with her husband and do so in a way that will be pleasing to the husband. Whether the husband agrees with the wife's idea to use family planning and gives her permission and funds for use, depends largely on her presentation of the idea, her husband's education level, and his personality. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed several relevant issues that play a role in Jordanian and Syrian women's decision to seek FP services. While cultural and social norms related to family planning and decision making continue to exert pressure on women, women have a deep interest in continuing to broaden their knowledge about family planning services. Engaging men and incorporating digital technology in family planning counselling has the potential to improve shared FP decision-making process among Jordanian couples and overcome some of the barriers. Elsevier 2021-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8379452/ /pubmed/34458635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07810 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Al-Sheyab, Nihaya A.
Al Nsour, Mohannad
Khader, Yousef S.
Yousif, Hind
Alyahya, Mohammad S.
Taha, Hana
Bardus, Marco
Al Kattan, Malika
Amiri, Mirwais
Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics
title Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics
title_full Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics
title_fullStr Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics
title_short Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics
title_sort midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07810
work_keys_str_mv AT alsheyabnihayaa midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics
AT alnsourmohannad midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics
AT khaderyousefs midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics
AT yousifhind midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics
AT alyahyamohammads midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics
AT tahahana midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics
AT bardusmarco midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics
AT alkattanmalika midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics
AT amirimirwais midwivesandwomensperspectivesonfamilyplanninginjordanhumanrightsgenderequitydecisionmakingandpowerdynamics