Cargando…

A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs

While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Seve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barlow, Alec, Roy, Kayla, Hawkins, Kristopher, Ankarah, Ako A., Rosenthal, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129
_version_ 1783741016818319360
author Barlow, Alec
Roy, Kayla
Hawkins, Kristopher
Ankarah, Ako A.
Rosenthal, Benjamin
author_facet Barlow, Alec
Roy, Kayla
Hawkins, Kristopher
Ankarah, Ako A.
Rosenthal, Benjamin
author_sort Barlow, Alec
collection PubMed
description While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of Trichinella larva free pork due to its cost efficiency, high specificity, and reliability. Serological techniques such as ELISA are useful for epidemiological surveillance of swine. While current PCR techniques are quick and useful for diagnosing species-specific infections, they are not cost efficient for large-scale testing. However, as PCR techniques, including Lateral Flow- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (LF-RPA), improve and continue to reduce cost, such methods may ultimately succeed artificial digestion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83794752021-08-26 A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs Barlow, Alec Roy, Kayla Hawkins, Kristopher Ankarah, Ako A. Rosenthal, Benjamin Food Waterborne Parasitol Short Communication While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of Trichinella larva free pork due to its cost efficiency, high specificity, and reliability. Serological techniques such as ELISA are useful for epidemiological surveillance of swine. While current PCR techniques are quick and useful for diagnosing species-specific infections, they are not cost efficient for large-scale testing. However, as PCR techniques, including Lateral Flow- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (LF-RPA), improve and continue to reduce cost, such methods may ultimately succeed artificial digestion. Elsevier 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8379475/ /pubmed/34458599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129 Text en Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Association of Food and Waterborne Parasitology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Barlow, Alec
Roy, Kayla
Hawkins, Kristopher
Ankarah, Ako A.
Rosenthal, Benjamin
A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs
title A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs
title_full A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs
title_fullStr A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs
title_full_unstemmed A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs
title_short A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs
title_sort review of testing and assurance methods for trichinella surveillance programs
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129
work_keys_str_mv AT barlowalec areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT roykayla areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT hawkinskristopher areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT ankarahakoa areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT rosenthalbenjamin areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT barlowalec reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT roykayla reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT hawkinskristopher reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT ankarahakoa reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms
AT rosenthalbenjamin reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms