Cargando…
A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs
While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Seve...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129 |
_version_ | 1783741016818319360 |
---|---|
author | Barlow, Alec Roy, Kayla Hawkins, Kristopher Ankarah, Ako A. Rosenthal, Benjamin |
author_facet | Barlow, Alec Roy, Kayla Hawkins, Kristopher Ankarah, Ako A. Rosenthal, Benjamin |
author_sort | Barlow, Alec |
collection | PubMed |
description | While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of Trichinella larva free pork due to its cost efficiency, high specificity, and reliability. Serological techniques such as ELISA are useful for epidemiological surveillance of swine. While current PCR techniques are quick and useful for diagnosing species-specific infections, they are not cost efficient for large-scale testing. However, as PCR techniques, including Lateral Flow- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (LF-RPA), improve and continue to reduce cost, such methods may ultimately succeed artificial digestion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8379475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83794752021-08-26 A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs Barlow, Alec Roy, Kayla Hawkins, Kristopher Ankarah, Ako A. Rosenthal, Benjamin Food Waterborne Parasitol Short Communication While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of Trichinella larva free pork due to its cost efficiency, high specificity, and reliability. Serological techniques such as ELISA are useful for epidemiological surveillance of swine. While current PCR techniques are quick and useful for diagnosing species-specific infections, they are not cost efficient for large-scale testing. However, as PCR techniques, including Lateral Flow- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (LF-RPA), improve and continue to reduce cost, such methods may ultimately succeed artificial digestion. Elsevier 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8379475/ /pubmed/34458599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129 Text en Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Association of Food and Waterborne Parasitology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Barlow, Alec Roy, Kayla Hawkins, Kristopher Ankarah, Ako A. Rosenthal, Benjamin A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs |
title | A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs |
title_full | A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs |
title_fullStr | A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs |
title_short | A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs |
title_sort | review of testing and assurance methods for trichinella surveillance programs |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barlowalec areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT roykayla areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT hawkinskristopher areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT ankarahakoa areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT rosenthalbenjamin areviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT barlowalec reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT roykayla reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT hawkinskristopher reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT ankarahakoa reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms AT rosenthalbenjamin reviewoftestingandassurancemethodsfortrichinellasurveillanceprograms |