Cargando…

Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle

Information on body weight and average daily gain (ADG) of growing animals is key not only to monitoring performance, but also for use in genetic evaluations in the pursuit of achieving sustainable genetic gain. Accurate calculation of ADG, however, requires serial measures of body weight over at le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacNeil, Michael D, Berry, Donagh P, Clark, Sam A, Crowley, John J, Scholtz, Michiel M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab126
_version_ 1783741025480605696
author MacNeil, Michael D
Berry, Donagh P
Clark, Sam A
Crowley, John J
Scholtz, Michiel M
author_facet MacNeil, Michael D
Berry, Donagh P
Clark, Sam A
Crowley, John J
Scholtz, Michiel M
author_sort MacNeil, Michael D
collection PubMed
description Information on body weight and average daily gain (ADG) of growing animals is key not only to monitoring performance, but also for use in genetic evaluations in the pursuit of achieving sustainable genetic gain. Accurate calculation of ADG, however, requires serial measures of body weight over at least 70 days. This can be resource intensive and thus alternative approaches to predicting individual animal ADG warrant investigation. One such approach is the use of continuously collected individual animal partial body weights. The objective of the present study was to determine the utility of partial body weights in predicting both body weight and ADG; a secondary objective was to deduce the appropriate length of test to determine ADG from partial body weight records. The dataset used consisted of partial body weights, predicted body weights and recorded body weights recorded for 8,972 growing cattle from a range of different breed types in 35 contemporary groups. The relationships among partial body weight, predicted body weight and recorded body weight at the beginning and end of the performance test were determined and calculated ADG per animal from each body weight measure were also compared. On average, partial body weight explained 90.7 ± 2.0% of the variation in recorded body weight at the beginning of the postweaning gain test and 87.9 ± 2.9% of the variation in recorded body weight at its end. The GrowSafe proprietary algorithm to predict body weight from the partial body weight strengthened these coefficients of determination to 95.1 ± 0.9% and 94.9 ± 0.8%, respectively. The ADG calculated from the partial body weight or from the predicted body weight were very strongly correlated (r = 0.95); correlations between these ADG values with those calculated from the recorded body weights were weaker at 0.81 and 0.78, respectively. For some applications, ADG may be measured with sufficient accuracy with a test period of 50 days using partial body weights. The intended inference space is to individual trials which have been represented in this study by contemporary groups of growing cattle from different genotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83795162021-08-23 Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle MacNeil, Michael D Berry, Donagh P Clark, Sam A Crowley, John J Scholtz, Michiel M Transl Anim Sci Technology in Animal Science Information on body weight and average daily gain (ADG) of growing animals is key not only to monitoring performance, but also for use in genetic evaluations in the pursuit of achieving sustainable genetic gain. Accurate calculation of ADG, however, requires serial measures of body weight over at least 70 days. This can be resource intensive and thus alternative approaches to predicting individual animal ADG warrant investigation. One such approach is the use of continuously collected individual animal partial body weights. The objective of the present study was to determine the utility of partial body weights in predicting both body weight and ADG; a secondary objective was to deduce the appropriate length of test to determine ADG from partial body weight records. The dataset used consisted of partial body weights, predicted body weights and recorded body weights recorded for 8,972 growing cattle from a range of different breed types in 35 contemporary groups. The relationships among partial body weight, predicted body weight and recorded body weight at the beginning and end of the performance test were determined and calculated ADG per animal from each body weight measure were also compared. On average, partial body weight explained 90.7 ± 2.0% of the variation in recorded body weight at the beginning of the postweaning gain test and 87.9 ± 2.9% of the variation in recorded body weight at its end. The GrowSafe proprietary algorithm to predict body weight from the partial body weight strengthened these coefficients of determination to 95.1 ± 0.9% and 94.9 ± 0.8%, respectively. The ADG calculated from the partial body weight or from the predicted body weight were very strongly correlated (r = 0.95); correlations between these ADG values with those calculated from the recorded body weights were weaker at 0.81 and 0.78, respectively. For some applications, ADG may be measured with sufficient accuracy with a test period of 50 days using partial body weights. The intended inference space is to individual trials which have been represented in this study by contemporary groups of growing cattle from different genotypes. Oxford University Press 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8379516/ /pubmed/34430801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab126 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technology in Animal Science
MacNeil, Michael D
Berry, Donagh P
Clark, Sam A
Crowley, John J
Scholtz, Michiel M
Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle
title Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle
title_full Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle
title_fullStr Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle
title_short Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle
title_sort evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle
topic Technology in Animal Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab126
work_keys_str_mv AT macneilmichaeld evaluationofpartialbodyweightforpredictingbodyweightandaveragedailygainingrowingbeefcattle
AT berrydonaghp evaluationofpartialbodyweightforpredictingbodyweightandaveragedailygainingrowingbeefcattle
AT clarksama evaluationofpartialbodyweightforpredictingbodyweightandaveragedailygainingrowingbeefcattle
AT crowleyjohnj evaluationofpartialbodyweightforpredictingbodyweightandaveragedailygainingrowingbeefcattle
AT scholtzmichielm evaluationofpartialbodyweightforpredictingbodyweightandaveragedailygainingrowingbeefcattle