Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China

INTRODUCTION: The survival of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has achieved little progress in the last several decades. ALTER1202 confirmed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a third- or further-line option for relapsed SCLC. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectivenes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Jinhong, Wan, Qian, Shang, Jingjing, Qian, Xiaodan, Su, Dan, Sun, Zhiqiang, Liu, Guangjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01889-2
_version_ 1783741031194296320
author Gong, Jinhong
Wan, Qian
Shang, Jingjing
Qian, Xiaodan
Su, Dan
Sun, Zhiqiang
Liu, Guangjun
author_facet Gong, Jinhong
Wan, Qian
Shang, Jingjing
Qian, Xiaodan
Su, Dan
Sun, Zhiqiang
Liu, Guangjun
author_sort Gong, Jinhong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The survival of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has achieved little progress in the last several decades. ALTER1202 confirmed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a third- or further-line option for relapsed SCLC. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib compared with placebo as third- or further-line treatment for advanced SCLC in China. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate the process of advanced SCLC and estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anlotinib versus placebo. The health outcomes and utilities were derived from the ALTER1202 (NCT03059797) and published sources, respectively. Total costs were calculated from the perspective of Chinese society. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to explore the model uncertainties. RESULTS: Anlotinib was estimated to result in an additional 0.12 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $2131.32, resulting in an ICER of $17,741.94/QALY. The ICER did not exceed the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $30,833 per QALY, which was three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of China in 2019. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of anlotinib exerted the maximum influence on the result of the model, followed by the utility of progression-free survival (PFS) state in the anlotinib group and median overall survival (mOS) in the anlotinib group. In PSA, the probability of anlotinib being cost-effective was 26.6% and 78.5% when the WTP threshold was one and three times the GDP per capita, respectively. CONCLUSION: Anlotinib is likely to be a cost-effective option compared with placebo for patients with relapsed SCLC who experience failure of at least two lines of chemotherapy in China. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01889-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83795622021-08-23 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China Gong, Jinhong Wan, Qian Shang, Jingjing Qian, Xiaodan Su, Dan Sun, Zhiqiang Liu, Guangjun Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The survival of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has achieved little progress in the last several decades. ALTER1202 confirmed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a third- or further-line option for relapsed SCLC. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib compared with placebo as third- or further-line treatment for advanced SCLC in China. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate the process of advanced SCLC and estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anlotinib versus placebo. The health outcomes and utilities were derived from the ALTER1202 (NCT03059797) and published sources, respectively. Total costs were calculated from the perspective of Chinese society. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to explore the model uncertainties. RESULTS: Anlotinib was estimated to result in an additional 0.12 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $2131.32, resulting in an ICER of $17,741.94/QALY. The ICER did not exceed the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $30,833 per QALY, which was three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of China in 2019. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of anlotinib exerted the maximum influence on the result of the model, followed by the utility of progression-free survival (PFS) state in the anlotinib group and median overall survival (mOS) in the anlotinib group. In PSA, the probability of anlotinib being cost-effective was 26.6% and 78.5% when the WTP threshold was one and three times the GDP per capita, respectively. CONCLUSION: Anlotinib is likely to be a cost-effective option compared with placebo for patients with relapsed SCLC who experience failure of at least two lines of chemotherapy in China. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01889-2. Springer Healthcare 2021-08-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8379562/ /pubmed/34417989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01889-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gong, Jinhong
Wan, Qian
Shang, Jingjing
Qian, Xiaodan
Su, Dan
Sun, Zhiqiang
Liu, Guangjun
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as third- or further-line treatment for relapsed small cell lung cancer (sclc) in china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01889-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gongjinhong costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasthirdorfurtherlinetreatmentforrelapsedsmallcelllungcancersclcinchina
AT wanqian costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasthirdorfurtherlinetreatmentforrelapsedsmallcelllungcancersclcinchina
AT shangjingjing costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasthirdorfurtherlinetreatmentforrelapsedsmallcelllungcancersclcinchina
AT qianxiaodan costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasthirdorfurtherlinetreatmentforrelapsedsmallcelllungcancersclcinchina
AT sudan costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasthirdorfurtherlinetreatmentforrelapsedsmallcelllungcancersclcinchina
AT sunzhiqiang costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasthirdorfurtherlinetreatmentforrelapsedsmallcelllungcancersclcinchina
AT liuguangjun costeffectivenessanalysisofanlotinibasthirdorfurtherlinetreatmentforrelapsedsmallcelllungcancersclcinchina