Cargando…

In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients

BACKGROUND: Inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) has been shown to reduce pulmonary artery pressure and improve oxygenation. iEPO is mainly delivered via a syringe pump with feed tubing connected to a vibrating mesh nebulizer with high or low formulation concentration delivery. METHODS: An in vitro study and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jie, Augustynovich, Ashley E., Gurnani, Payal K., Fink, James B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01827-4
_version_ 1783741039420375040
author Li, Jie
Augustynovich, Ashley E.
Gurnani, Payal K.
Fink, James B.
author_facet Li, Jie
Augustynovich, Ashley E.
Gurnani, Payal K.
Fink, James B.
author_sort Li, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) has been shown to reduce pulmonary artery pressure and improve oxygenation. iEPO is mainly delivered via a syringe pump with feed tubing connected to a vibrating mesh nebulizer with high or low formulation concentration delivery. METHODS: An in vitro study and a two-period retrospective case–control study were implemented. The in vitro study compared iEPO delivery via invasive ventilation at low concentrations of 7.5, and 15 mcg/mL and high concentration at 30 mcg/mL, to deliver the ordered dose of 30 and 50 ng/kg/min for three clinical scenarios with predicted body weight of 50, 70 and 90 kg. While in the clinical study, adult patients receiving iEPO via invasive ventilation to treat refractory hypoxemia, pulmonary hypertension, or right ventricular failure were included. 80 patients received low concentration iEPO at multiple concentrations (2.5, 7.5, and 15 mcg/mL, depending on the ordered dose) from 2015 to 2017, while 84 patients received high concentration iEPO at 30 mcg/mL from 2018 to 2019. RESULTS: In the in vitro study, there were no significant differences in aerosol deposition between high vs low concentrations of iEPO at a dose of 50 ng/kg/min. In the clinical study, age, gender, ethnicity, and indications for iEPO were similar between high and low concentration groups. After 30–120 min of iEPO administration, both delivery strategies significantly improved oxygenation in hypoxemic patients and reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) for patients with pulmonary hypertension. However, no significant differences of the incremental changes were found between two delivery groups. Compared to low concentration, high concentration delivery group had better adherence to the iEPO weaning protocol (96% vs 71%, p < 0.001), fewer iEPO syringes utilized per patient (5 [3, 10] vs 12 [6, 22], p = 0.001), and shorter duration of invasive ventilation (6 [3, 12] vs 9 [5, 18] days, p = 0.028). Intensive care unit length of stay and mortality were similar between two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to low concentration delivery of iEPO, high concentration iEPO via a vibrating mesh nebulizer maintained clinical benefits and increased clinician compliance with an iEPO weaning protocol, required less medication preparation time, and shortened duration of invasive ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83795972021-08-23 In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients Li, Jie Augustynovich, Ashley E. Gurnani, Payal K. Fink, James B. Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) has been shown to reduce pulmonary artery pressure and improve oxygenation. iEPO is mainly delivered via a syringe pump with feed tubing connected to a vibrating mesh nebulizer with high or low formulation concentration delivery. METHODS: An in vitro study and a two-period retrospective case–control study were implemented. The in vitro study compared iEPO delivery via invasive ventilation at low concentrations of 7.5, and 15 mcg/mL and high concentration at 30 mcg/mL, to deliver the ordered dose of 30 and 50 ng/kg/min for three clinical scenarios with predicted body weight of 50, 70 and 90 kg. While in the clinical study, adult patients receiving iEPO via invasive ventilation to treat refractory hypoxemia, pulmonary hypertension, or right ventricular failure were included. 80 patients received low concentration iEPO at multiple concentrations (2.5, 7.5, and 15 mcg/mL, depending on the ordered dose) from 2015 to 2017, while 84 patients received high concentration iEPO at 30 mcg/mL from 2018 to 2019. RESULTS: In the in vitro study, there were no significant differences in aerosol deposition between high vs low concentrations of iEPO at a dose of 50 ng/kg/min. In the clinical study, age, gender, ethnicity, and indications for iEPO were similar between high and low concentration groups. After 30–120 min of iEPO administration, both delivery strategies significantly improved oxygenation in hypoxemic patients and reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) for patients with pulmonary hypertension. However, no significant differences of the incremental changes were found between two delivery groups. Compared to low concentration, high concentration delivery group had better adherence to the iEPO weaning protocol (96% vs 71%, p < 0.001), fewer iEPO syringes utilized per patient (5 [3, 10] vs 12 [6, 22], p = 0.001), and shorter duration of invasive ventilation (6 [3, 12] vs 9 [5, 18] days, p = 0.028). Intensive care unit length of stay and mortality were similar between two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to low concentration delivery of iEPO, high concentration iEPO via a vibrating mesh nebulizer maintained clinical benefits and increased clinician compliance with an iEPO weaning protocol, required less medication preparation time, and shortened duration of invasive ventilation. BioMed Central 2021-08-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8379597/ /pubmed/34419068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01827-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Jie
Augustynovich, Ashley E.
Gurnani, Payal K.
Fink, James B.
In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients
title In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients
title_full In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients
title_fullStr In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients
title_full_unstemmed In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients
title_short In-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients
title_sort in-vitro and in-vivo comparisons of high versus low concentrations of inhaled epoprostenol to adult intubated patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01827-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lijie invitroandinvivocomparisonsofhighversuslowconcentrationsofinhaledepoprostenoltoadultintubatedpatients
AT augustynovichashleye invitroandinvivocomparisonsofhighversuslowconcentrationsofinhaledepoprostenoltoadultintubatedpatients
AT gurnanipayalk invitroandinvivocomparisonsofhighversuslowconcentrationsofinhaledepoprostenoltoadultintubatedpatients
AT finkjamesb invitroandinvivocomparisonsofhighversuslowconcentrationsofinhaledepoprostenoltoadultintubatedpatients