Cargando…

Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Older adults in long-term care (LTC) homes experience high rates of fractures, which are detrimental to their quality of life. The purpose of this study is to identify and make recommendations on strategies to implementing an evidence-based Fracture Risk Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Yuxin, McArthur, Caitlin, Ioannidis, George, Giangregorio, Lora, Straus, Sharon, Papaioannou, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02388-3
_version_ 1783741086925062144
author Bai, Yuxin
McArthur, Caitlin
Ioannidis, George
Giangregorio, Lora
Straus, Sharon
Papaioannou, Alexandra
author_facet Bai, Yuxin
McArthur, Caitlin
Ioannidis, George
Giangregorio, Lora
Straus, Sharon
Papaioannou, Alexandra
author_sort Bai, Yuxin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older adults in long-term care (LTC) homes experience high rates of fractures, which are detrimental to their quality of life. The purpose of this study is to identify and make recommendations on strategies to implementing an evidence-based Fracture Risk Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP) in LTC. METHODS: Following the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, we conducted six focus group interviews with a total of 32 LTC stakeholders (e.g. LTC physicians) to identify barriers and facilitators, suggest implementation strategies, and discuss whether the identified strategies were affordable, practicable, effective, acceptable, safe, and if they promote equity (APEASE). The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Themes of implementation strategies that met the APEASE criteria were minimizing any increase in workload, training on CAP usage, education for residents and families, and persuasion through stories. Other strategy themes identified were culture change, resident-centred care, physical restructuring, software features, modeling in training, education for staff, social rewards, material rewards, public benchmarking, and regulations. CONCLUSIONS: To implement the Fracture Risk CAP in LTC, we recommend using implementation strategies centred around minimizing any increase in workload, training on CAP usage, providing education for residents and families, and persuading through stories. Through improving implementation of the fracture risk CAP, results from this work will improve identification and management of LTC residents at high fracture risk and could inform the implementation of guidelines for other conditions in LTC homes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02388-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8379826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83798262021-08-23 Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study Bai, Yuxin McArthur, Caitlin Ioannidis, George Giangregorio, Lora Straus, Sharon Papaioannou, Alexandra BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Older adults in long-term care (LTC) homes experience high rates of fractures, which are detrimental to their quality of life. The purpose of this study is to identify and make recommendations on strategies to implementing an evidence-based Fracture Risk Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP) in LTC. METHODS: Following the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, we conducted six focus group interviews with a total of 32 LTC stakeholders (e.g. LTC physicians) to identify barriers and facilitators, suggest implementation strategies, and discuss whether the identified strategies were affordable, practicable, effective, acceptable, safe, and if they promote equity (APEASE). The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Themes of implementation strategies that met the APEASE criteria were minimizing any increase in workload, training on CAP usage, education for residents and families, and persuasion through stories. Other strategy themes identified were culture change, resident-centred care, physical restructuring, software features, modeling in training, education for staff, social rewards, material rewards, public benchmarking, and regulations. CONCLUSIONS: To implement the Fracture Risk CAP in LTC, we recommend using implementation strategies centred around minimizing any increase in workload, training on CAP usage, providing education for residents and families, and persuading through stories. Through improving implementation of the fracture risk CAP, results from this work will improve identification and management of LTC residents at high fracture risk and could inform the implementation of guidelines for other conditions in LTC homes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02388-3. BioMed Central 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8379826/ /pubmed/34418976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02388-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bai, Yuxin
McArthur, Caitlin
Ioannidis, George
Giangregorio, Lora
Straus, Sharon
Papaioannou, Alexandra
Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study
title Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study
title_full Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study
title_short Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study
title_sort strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8379826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02388-3
work_keys_str_mv AT baiyuxin strategiesfortheimplementationofanelectronicfractureriskassessmenttoolinlongtermcareaqualitativestudy
AT mcarthurcaitlin strategiesfortheimplementationofanelectronicfractureriskassessmenttoolinlongtermcareaqualitativestudy
AT ioannidisgeorge strategiesfortheimplementationofanelectronicfractureriskassessmenttoolinlongtermcareaqualitativestudy
AT giangregoriolora strategiesfortheimplementationofanelectronicfractureriskassessmenttoolinlongtermcareaqualitativestudy
AT straussharon strategiesfortheimplementationofanelectronicfractureriskassessmenttoolinlongtermcareaqualitativestudy
AT papaioannoualexandra strategiesfortheimplementationofanelectronicfractureriskassessmenttoolinlongtermcareaqualitativestudy