Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has established efficacy in the treatment of depression and a growing evidence base in the treatment of depression. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of MST in anti-depressive treatment and its impact on cognitive function (INPL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34420033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01560-y |
_version_ | 1783741162381639680 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Miao Yang, Xuhui Liu, Chaojie Li, Jianying Wang, Xiao Yang, Chunxia Hu, Xiaodong Li, Jianhong Zhao, Juan Li, Xinrong Xu, Yong Liu, Sha |
author_facet | Chen, Miao Yang, Xuhui Liu, Chaojie Li, Jianying Wang, Xiao Yang, Chunxia Hu, Xiaodong Li, Jianhong Zhao, Juan Li, Xinrong Xu, Yong Liu, Sha |
author_sort | Chen, Miao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has established efficacy in the treatment of depression and a growing evidence base in the treatment of depression. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of MST in anti-depressive treatment and its impact on cognitive function (INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202170061). We searched for controlled trials published in English between 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2020 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. The evaluation process strictly followed the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool into the literature, and Meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane System Reviewer’s Manual. Data from a total of 285 patients from 10 studies were retained in the quantitative synthesis. The results showed no significant difference between MST and ECT in the antidepressant effect (SDM −0.13 [−0.78;0.52]). Compared with ECT, MST showed shorter recovery time (MD −5.67 [−9.75; −1.60]) and reorientation time (MD −14.67 [−27.96; −1.41]); and MST showed less cognitive impairment on the immediate recall of words (SDM 0.80 [0.35;1.25]), delayed recall of words (SDM 0.99 [0.01;0.74]), visual-spatial immediate memory (SDM 0.51 [0.20;0.83]), visual-spatial delayed memory (SDM 0.57 [0.11;1.02]), and the verbal fluency (SDM 0.51 [0.20;0.83]). Our evidence-based study is the first meta-analysis on the efficacy of MST in anti-depressive treatment and its effect on cognitive function. It showed that the curative effect of MST in anti-depressive treatment is equivalent to that of ECT. Besides, depressive patients with MST benefit more from cognitive function compared with ECT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8380249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83802492021-09-08 Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Miao Yang, Xuhui Liu, Chaojie Li, Jianying Wang, Xiao Yang, Chunxia Hu, Xiaodong Li, Jianhong Zhao, Juan Li, Xinrong Xu, Yong Liu, Sha Transl Psychiatry Review Article Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has established efficacy in the treatment of depression and a growing evidence base in the treatment of depression. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of MST in anti-depressive treatment and its impact on cognitive function (INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202170061). We searched for controlled trials published in English between 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2020 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. The evaluation process strictly followed the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool into the literature, and Meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane System Reviewer’s Manual. Data from a total of 285 patients from 10 studies were retained in the quantitative synthesis. The results showed no significant difference between MST and ECT in the antidepressant effect (SDM −0.13 [−0.78;0.52]). Compared with ECT, MST showed shorter recovery time (MD −5.67 [−9.75; −1.60]) and reorientation time (MD −14.67 [−27.96; −1.41]); and MST showed less cognitive impairment on the immediate recall of words (SDM 0.80 [0.35;1.25]), delayed recall of words (SDM 0.99 [0.01;0.74]), visual-spatial immediate memory (SDM 0.51 [0.20;0.83]), visual-spatial delayed memory (SDM 0.57 [0.11;1.02]), and the verbal fluency (SDM 0.51 [0.20;0.83]). Our evidence-based study is the first meta-analysis on the efficacy of MST in anti-depressive treatment and its effect on cognitive function. It showed that the curative effect of MST in anti-depressive treatment is equivalent to that of ECT. Besides, depressive patients with MST benefit more from cognitive function compared with ECT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8380249/ /pubmed/34420033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01560-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chen, Miao Yang, Xuhui Liu, Chaojie Li, Jianying Wang, Xiao Yang, Chunxia Hu, Xiaodong Li, Jianhong Zhao, Juan Li, Xinrong Xu, Yong Liu, Sha Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and cognitive function of magnetic seizure therapy vs. electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34420033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01560-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenmiao comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangxuhui comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuchaojie comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijianying comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxiao comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangchunxia comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huxiaodong comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijianhong comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaojuan comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lixinrong comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuyong comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liusha comparativeefficacyandcognitivefunctionofmagneticseizuretherapyvselectroconvulsivetherapyformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |