Cargando…

Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging

OBJECTIVE: To identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic absce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhuo, Li-Yong, Xing, Li-Hong, Ma, Xi, Zhang, Yu, Ma, Ze-Peng, Yin, Xiao-Ping, Wang, Jia-Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429624
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S318291
_version_ 1783741167998861312
author Zhuo, Li-Yong
Xing, Li-Hong
Ma, Xi
Zhang, Yu
Ma, Ze-Peng
Yin, Xiao-Ping
Wang, Jia-Ning
author_facet Zhuo, Li-Yong
Xing, Li-Hong
Ma, Xi
Zhang, Yu
Ma, Ze-Peng
Yin, Xiao-Ping
Wang, Jia-Ning
author_sort Zhuo, Li-Yong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic abscesses and 32 patients with 35 hepatic metastases who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. All lesions were confirmed by pathological or clinical diagnosis. For the qualitative and quantitative analyses, the signal intensity, DWI pattern, apparent diffusion coefficient, degree of perilesional edema, perilesional hyperemia, perilesional signal on HBPI, conspicuity, size discrepancy between sequences, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative enhancement ratio on dynamic phases were independently assessed by two radiologists. Significant findings for differentiating the two groups were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses with a nomogram for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. The interobserver agreement was also analyzed for each variable. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis revealed that the conspicuity discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 34.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09–579.47, p = 0.013) and non-peripheral high signal intensity (SI) rim on DWI (OR 67.46, 95% CI 2.64, 1723.20, p = 0.011) were significant independent factors for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. They were also shown to be high predictor points on the nomogram. When any of the set criteria were satisfied, 97.7% of atypical hepatic abscesses were correctly identified, with a specificity of 65.7%. When both criteria were combined, the specificity was up to 100%, with a sensitivity of 44.9%. CONCLUSION: Conspicuity discrepancy and a non-peripheral high SI rim on DWI are reliable and meaningful features that can distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8380289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83802892021-08-23 Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging Zhuo, Li-Yong Xing, Li-Hong Ma, Xi Zhang, Yu Ma, Ze-Peng Yin, Xiao-Ping Wang, Jia-Ning Infect Drug Resist Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic abscesses and 32 patients with 35 hepatic metastases who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. All lesions were confirmed by pathological or clinical diagnosis. For the qualitative and quantitative analyses, the signal intensity, DWI pattern, apparent diffusion coefficient, degree of perilesional edema, perilesional hyperemia, perilesional signal on HBPI, conspicuity, size discrepancy between sequences, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative enhancement ratio on dynamic phases were independently assessed by two radiologists. Significant findings for differentiating the two groups were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses with a nomogram for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. The interobserver agreement was also analyzed for each variable. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis revealed that the conspicuity discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 34.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09–579.47, p = 0.013) and non-peripheral high signal intensity (SI) rim on DWI (OR 67.46, 95% CI 2.64, 1723.20, p = 0.011) were significant independent factors for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. They were also shown to be high predictor points on the nomogram. When any of the set criteria were satisfied, 97.7% of atypical hepatic abscesses were correctly identified, with a specificity of 65.7%. When both criteria were combined, the specificity was up to 100%, with a sensitivity of 44.9%. CONCLUSION: Conspicuity discrepancy and a non-peripheral high SI rim on DWI are reliable and meaningful features that can distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. Dove 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8380289/ /pubmed/34429624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S318291 Text en © 2021 Zhuo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhuo, Li-Yong
Xing, Li-Hong
Ma, Xi
Zhang, Yu
Ma, Ze-Peng
Yin, Xiao-Ping
Wang, Jia-Ning
Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging
title Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging
title_full Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging
title_fullStr Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging
title_short Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging
title_sort differentiating between an atypical hepatic abscess and tumor metastasis using magnetic resonance imaging and hepatobiliary phase imaging
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429624
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S318291
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuoliyong differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging
AT xinglihong differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging
AT maxi differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging
AT zhangyu differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging
AT mazepeng differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging
AT yinxiaoping differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging
AT wangjianing differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging