Cargando…
Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging
OBJECTIVE: To identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic absce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S318291 |
_version_ | 1783741167998861312 |
---|---|
author | Zhuo, Li-Yong Xing, Li-Hong Ma, Xi Zhang, Yu Ma, Ze-Peng Yin, Xiao-Ping Wang, Jia-Ning |
author_facet | Zhuo, Li-Yong Xing, Li-Hong Ma, Xi Zhang, Yu Ma, Ze-Peng Yin, Xiao-Ping Wang, Jia-Ning |
author_sort | Zhuo, Li-Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic abscesses and 32 patients with 35 hepatic metastases who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. All lesions were confirmed by pathological or clinical diagnosis. For the qualitative and quantitative analyses, the signal intensity, DWI pattern, apparent diffusion coefficient, degree of perilesional edema, perilesional hyperemia, perilesional signal on HBPI, conspicuity, size discrepancy between sequences, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative enhancement ratio on dynamic phases were independently assessed by two radiologists. Significant findings for differentiating the two groups were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses with a nomogram for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. The interobserver agreement was also analyzed for each variable. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis revealed that the conspicuity discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 34.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09–579.47, p = 0.013) and non-peripheral high signal intensity (SI) rim on DWI (OR 67.46, 95% CI 2.64, 1723.20, p = 0.011) were significant independent factors for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. They were also shown to be high predictor points on the nomogram. When any of the set criteria were satisfied, 97.7% of atypical hepatic abscesses were correctly identified, with a specificity of 65.7%. When both criteria were combined, the specificity was up to 100%, with a sensitivity of 44.9%. CONCLUSION: Conspicuity discrepancy and a non-peripheral high SI rim on DWI are reliable and meaningful features that can distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8380289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83802892021-08-23 Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging Zhuo, Li-Yong Xing, Li-Hong Ma, Xi Zhang, Yu Ma, Ze-Peng Yin, Xiao-Ping Wang, Jia-Ning Infect Drug Resist Original Research OBJECTIVE: To identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic abscesses and 32 patients with 35 hepatic metastases who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. All lesions were confirmed by pathological or clinical diagnosis. For the qualitative and quantitative analyses, the signal intensity, DWI pattern, apparent diffusion coefficient, degree of perilesional edema, perilesional hyperemia, perilesional signal on HBPI, conspicuity, size discrepancy between sequences, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative enhancement ratio on dynamic phases were independently assessed by two radiologists. Significant findings for differentiating the two groups were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses with a nomogram for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. The interobserver agreement was also analyzed for each variable. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis revealed that the conspicuity discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 34.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09–579.47, p = 0.013) and non-peripheral high signal intensity (SI) rim on DWI (OR 67.46, 95% CI 2.64, 1723.20, p = 0.011) were significant independent factors for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. They were also shown to be high predictor points on the nomogram. When any of the set criteria were satisfied, 97.7% of atypical hepatic abscesses were correctly identified, with a specificity of 65.7%. When both criteria were combined, the specificity was up to 100%, with a sensitivity of 44.9%. CONCLUSION: Conspicuity discrepancy and a non-peripheral high SI rim on DWI are reliable and meaningful features that can distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases. Dove 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8380289/ /pubmed/34429624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S318291 Text en © 2021 Zhuo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zhuo, Li-Yong Xing, Li-Hong Ma, Xi Zhang, Yu Ma, Ze-Peng Yin, Xiao-Ping Wang, Jia-Ning Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging |
title | Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging |
title_full | Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging |
title_fullStr | Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging |
title_short | Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging |
title_sort | differentiating between an atypical hepatic abscess and tumor metastasis using magnetic resonance imaging and hepatobiliary phase imaging |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S318291 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuoliyong differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging AT xinglihong differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging AT maxi differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging AT zhangyu differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging AT mazepeng differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging AT yinxiaoping differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging AT wangjianing differentiatingbetweenanatypicalhepaticabscessandtumormetastasisusingmagneticresonanceimagingandhepatobiliaryphaseimaging |