Cargando…

Benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the New Zealand joint registry study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the relative performance of total hip replacement constructs and discern if there is substantial variability in performance in currently commonly used prostheses in the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) using a noninferiority analysis. METHODS: All pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wyatt, Michael, Frampton, Chris, Whitehouse, Michael, Deere, Kevin, Sayers, Adrian, Kieser, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04602-0
_version_ 1783741180879568896
author Wyatt, Michael
Frampton, Chris
Whitehouse, Michael
Deere, Kevin
Sayers, Adrian
Kieser, David
author_facet Wyatt, Michael
Frampton, Chris
Whitehouse, Michael
Deere, Kevin
Sayers, Adrian
Kieser, David
author_sort Wyatt, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the relative performance of total hip replacement constructs and discern if there is substantial variability in performance in currently commonly used prostheses in the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) using a noninferiority analysis. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary total hip replacement (THR) registered in the NZJR between 1st January 1999 to June 2020 were identified. Using a noninferiority analysis, the performance of hip prostheses were compared with the best performing contemporary construct. Construct failure was estimated using the 1-Kaplan Meier survival function method to estimate net failure. The difference in failure between the contemporary benchmark and other constructs was examined. RESULTS: In total 135,432 THR were recorded comprising 1035 different THR constructs. Notably 328 constructs were used just once. Forty-eight constructs (62,251 THR) had > 500 procedures at risk at 3 years post-primary of which 28 were inferior by at least 20% relative risk of which, 10 were inferior by at least 100% relative risk. Sixteen constructs were identified with > 500 procedures at risk at 10 years with 9 inferior by at least 20%, of which one was inferior by > 100% relative risk. There were fewer constructs noninferior to the best practice benchmark when we performed analysis by gender. In females at 10 years, from 5 constructs with > 500 constructs at risk, 2 were inferior at the 20% margin. In males at 10 years, there were only 2 eligible constructs of which one was inferior at the 20% margin. CONCLUSIONS: We discerned that there is substantial variability in construct performance and at most time points, just over half of constructs are inferior to the best performing construct by at least 20%. These results can facilitate informed decision-making when considering THR surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04602-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8380353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83803532021-08-23 Benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the New Zealand joint registry study Wyatt, Michael Frampton, Chris Whitehouse, Michael Deere, Kevin Sayers, Adrian Kieser, David BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the relative performance of total hip replacement constructs and discern if there is substantial variability in performance in currently commonly used prostheses in the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) using a noninferiority analysis. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary total hip replacement (THR) registered in the NZJR between 1st January 1999 to June 2020 were identified. Using a noninferiority analysis, the performance of hip prostheses were compared with the best performing contemporary construct. Construct failure was estimated using the 1-Kaplan Meier survival function method to estimate net failure. The difference in failure between the contemporary benchmark and other constructs was examined. RESULTS: In total 135,432 THR were recorded comprising 1035 different THR constructs. Notably 328 constructs were used just once. Forty-eight constructs (62,251 THR) had > 500 procedures at risk at 3 years post-primary of which 28 were inferior by at least 20% relative risk of which, 10 were inferior by at least 100% relative risk. Sixteen constructs were identified with > 500 procedures at risk at 10 years with 9 inferior by at least 20%, of which one was inferior by > 100% relative risk. There were fewer constructs noninferior to the best practice benchmark when we performed analysis by gender. In females at 10 years, from 5 constructs with > 500 constructs at risk, 2 were inferior at the 20% margin. In males at 10 years, there were only 2 eligible constructs of which one was inferior at the 20% margin. CONCLUSIONS: We discerned that there is substantial variability in construct performance and at most time points, just over half of constructs are inferior to the best performing construct by at least 20%. These results can facilitate informed decision-making when considering THR surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04602-0. BioMed Central 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8380353/ /pubmed/34419036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04602-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wyatt, Michael
Frampton, Chris
Whitehouse, Michael
Deere, Kevin
Sayers, Adrian
Kieser, David
Benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the New Zealand joint registry study
title Benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the New Zealand joint registry study
title_full Benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the New Zealand joint registry study
title_fullStr Benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the New Zealand joint registry study
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the New Zealand joint registry study
title_short Benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the New Zealand joint registry study
title_sort benchmarking total hip replacement constructs using noninferiority analysis: the new zealand joint registry study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04602-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wyattmichael benchmarkingtotalhipreplacementconstructsusingnoninferiorityanalysisthenewzealandjointregistrystudy
AT framptonchris benchmarkingtotalhipreplacementconstructsusingnoninferiorityanalysisthenewzealandjointregistrystudy
AT whitehousemichael benchmarkingtotalhipreplacementconstructsusingnoninferiorityanalysisthenewzealandjointregistrystudy
AT deerekevin benchmarkingtotalhipreplacementconstructsusingnoninferiorityanalysisthenewzealandjointregistrystudy
AT sayersadrian benchmarkingtotalhipreplacementconstructsusingnoninferiorityanalysisthenewzealandjointregistrystudy
AT kieserdavid benchmarkingtotalhipreplacementconstructsusingnoninferiorityanalysisthenewzealandjointregistrystudy