Cargando…
A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of and time taken by a novel method using the built-in photo-edit function of smartphones compared with PACS in measuring hallux valgus parameters. METHODS: Seventy patients (124 ft) admitted to our hospital with a dia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04604-y |
_version_ | 1783741189462163456 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Tianji Wang, Lin Lu, Chao Zhong, Weiyang Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji |
author_facet | Huang, Tianji Wang, Lin Lu, Chao Zhong, Weiyang Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji |
author_sort | Huang, Tianji |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of and time taken by a novel method using the built-in photo-edit function of smartphones compared with PACS in measuring hallux valgus parameters. METHODS: Seventy patients (124 ft) admitted to our hospital with a diagnosis of hallux valgus without previous surgical procedures were retrospectively reviewed. The foot radiographs of all the patients were extracted from PACS. The hallux valgus angle (HVA) and the first and second intermetatarsal angles (IMAs) were measured by PACS and by this novel method using the built-in photo-edit function of a smartphone. The results of these two methods were compared, and the accuracy and reliability were assessed between these two methods. RESULTS: The average parameters measured by PACS were as follows: HVA average: 37.43 ± 9.61°; IMA average: 13.37 ± 4.01°. The average parameters measured by smartphones were as follows: HVA average: 37.09 ± 9.52° and IMA average: 13.49 ± 3.91°. When compared by the independent-samples T test, the average parameters between PACS and smartphones were not significantly different (HVA PACS vs HVA smartphones: P = 0.776; IMA PACS vs IMA smartphones: P = 0.816). The variability of the HVA (F = 0.166, P = 0.992) and IMA (F = 0.215, P = 0.982) measurements was similar for the PACS and smartphones. The ICCs of the average parameters of four measurements of HVA and IMA between PACS and smartphones were 0.995 (0.991–0.997) and 0.970 (0.958–0.979), indicating that the two methods were highly correlated. For the smartphone measurement, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability was very good for HVA and IMA. The average measurement time of PACS was 25.41 ± 0.86 s, and the average measurement time of smartphones was 20.29 ± 1.22 s. The smartphone time was significantly faster than that of PACS by approximately 5 s (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This novel method using the built-in photo-edit function of smartphones is accurate, reliable, convenient and time-saving in measuring the angles of hallux valgus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8380395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83803952021-08-23 A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones Huang, Tianji Wang, Lin Lu, Chao Zhong, Weiyang Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of and time taken by a novel method using the built-in photo-edit function of smartphones compared with PACS in measuring hallux valgus parameters. METHODS: Seventy patients (124 ft) admitted to our hospital with a diagnosis of hallux valgus without previous surgical procedures were retrospectively reviewed. The foot radiographs of all the patients were extracted from PACS. The hallux valgus angle (HVA) and the first and second intermetatarsal angles (IMAs) were measured by PACS and by this novel method using the built-in photo-edit function of a smartphone. The results of these two methods were compared, and the accuracy and reliability were assessed between these two methods. RESULTS: The average parameters measured by PACS were as follows: HVA average: 37.43 ± 9.61°; IMA average: 13.37 ± 4.01°. The average parameters measured by smartphones were as follows: HVA average: 37.09 ± 9.52° and IMA average: 13.49 ± 3.91°. When compared by the independent-samples T test, the average parameters between PACS and smartphones were not significantly different (HVA PACS vs HVA smartphones: P = 0.776; IMA PACS vs IMA smartphones: P = 0.816). The variability of the HVA (F = 0.166, P = 0.992) and IMA (F = 0.215, P = 0.982) measurements was similar for the PACS and smartphones. The ICCs of the average parameters of four measurements of HVA and IMA between PACS and smartphones were 0.995 (0.991–0.997) and 0.970 (0.958–0.979), indicating that the two methods were highly correlated. For the smartphone measurement, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability was very good for HVA and IMA. The average measurement time of PACS was 25.41 ± 0.86 s, and the average measurement time of smartphones was 20.29 ± 1.22 s. The smartphone time was significantly faster than that of PACS by approximately 5 s (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This novel method using the built-in photo-edit function of smartphones is accurate, reliable, convenient and time-saving in measuring the angles of hallux valgus. BioMed Central 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8380395/ /pubmed/34419028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04604-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Huang, Tianji Wang, Lin Lu, Chao Zhong, Weiyang Zhao, Zenghui Luo, Xiaoji A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones |
title | A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones |
title_full | A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones |
title_fullStr | A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones |
title_short | A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones |
title_sort | novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04604-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangtianji anovelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT wanglin anovelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT luchao anovelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT zhongweiyang anovelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT zhaozenghui anovelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT luoxiaoji anovelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT huangtianji novelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT wanglin novelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT luchao novelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT zhongweiyang novelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT zhaozenghui novelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones AT luoxiaoji novelrapidmeasurementofhalluxvalgusparametersusingthebuiltinphotoeditfunctionofsmartphones |