Cargando…

Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”

“Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools,” a recent publication in this journal, applied the study evaluation approach developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Integrated Risk Information System (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Radke, Elizabeth G., Glenn, Barbara S., Kraft, Andrew D.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2021
Materias:	Letter
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01783-6

Ejemplares similares

Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Correction: Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Drawing a different conclusion
por: Anwari, Jamil S.
Publicado: (2013)

Data and tools to integrate climate and environmental information into public health
por: Ceccato, Pietro, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Epidemiological Conclusions and Suggestions
por: Milroy, Gavin
Publicado: (1870)

Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)
por: Ahmadzadeh, Arman, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

NUQUEST—NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Invited Perspective: Risk of Bias Assessments, Target Trials, and the Strengths of Environmental Epidemiology
por: Huang, Jonathan
Publicado: (2023)

The heuristics-and-biases inventory: An open-source tool to explore individual differences in rationality
por: Berthet, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Environmental management tools on the internet: accessing the world of environmental information
por: Katz, Michael
Publicado: (1996)

Update of environmental risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations of EFSA (2016) on EU teosinte
por: Devos, Yann, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of bias judgements and strength of conclusions in meta-evidence from the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group
por: Delaney, John, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A tool named Iris for versatile high-throughput phenotyping in microorganisms
por: Kritikos, George, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Use of Different Sepsis Risk Stratification Tools on the Wards and in Emergency Departments Uncovers Different Mortality Risks: Results of the Three Welsh National Multicenter Point-Prevalence Studies
por: Unwin, Harry J. A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Using the tools of genetic epidemiology to understand sex differences in neuropsychiatric disorders
por: Merikangas, Alison K., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals
por: Liu, Yali, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
por: Whiting, Penny, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

ROBITT: A tool for assessing the risk‐of‐bias in studies of temporal trends in ecology
por: Boyd, Robin J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Improving Risk Informed HPV Screening (IRIS) Study: Design and Baseline Characteristics
por: Gage, Julia C., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Confidence interval of risk difference by different statistical methods and its impact on the study conclusion in antibiotic non-inferiority trials
por: Bai, Anthony D., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Toxicometabolomics as a tool for next generation environmental risk assessment
por: Bernhard, Annette, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Interregional differences undermine sperm trend conclusions.
por: Heinze, J
Publicado: (1998)

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
por: Sterne, Jonathan AC, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols
por: Farrah, Kelly, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Prediction Model Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease
por: Huang, Hongbiao, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review
por: Spiga, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Conclusions: Still Risking Implementation Gaps
por: Cavatorto, Sabrina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Risk of Bias Assessments and Evidence Syntheses for Observational Epidemiologic Studies of Environmental and Occupational Exposures: Strengths and Limitations
por: Steenland, Kyle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Regional differences invalidate U.S. sperm trend conclusions.
por: Heinze, J
Publicado: (1999)

Iris Colour and the Risk of Developing Uveal Melanoma
por: Houtzagers, Laurien E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol
por: da Costa, Bruno R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study
por: da Costa, Bruno R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to Evaluate Melanoma Prediction Studies
por: Kaiser, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

RoBANS 2: A Revised Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions
por: Seo, Hyun-Ju, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Diagnostic tools for the detection of taeniid eggs in different environmental matrices: A systematic review.
por: Saelens, Ganna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Workforce requirements in rheumatology: a systematic literature review informing the development of a workforce prediction risk of bias tool and the EULAR points to consider
por: Unger, Julia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_16tumikmodv28ku2rl8dgd5uq0