Cargando…

Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUD: Optimal placement of the components and achieving a neutral mechanical axis are the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different computerised navigation systems are presently used for these purposes. This aim of this study was to compare the pinless navigation (PNA) TKA performe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pawar, Prashant, Naik, Lokesh, Sahu, Dipit, Bagaria, Vaibhav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34484629
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios20226
_version_ 1783741215384010752
author Pawar, Prashant
Naik, Lokesh
Sahu, Dipit
Bagaria, Vaibhav
author_facet Pawar, Prashant
Naik, Lokesh
Sahu, Dipit
Bagaria, Vaibhav
author_sort Pawar, Prashant
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUD: Optimal placement of the components and achieving a neutral mechanical axis are the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different computerised navigation systems are presently used for these purposes. This aim of this study was to compare the pinless navigation (PNA) TKA performed using iAssist with the conventional instrumented (CIN) TKA in terms of functional and radiological outcomes. METHODS: A total of 100 knees operated for TKA by a single surgeon were studied retrospectively for a period of 2 years. Weight-bearing postoperative radiographs of the knees along with scanograms of the lower limbs were used for measurements of component positioning, mechanical axis alignment, and number of outliers. Oxford knee scoring was used for functional analysis. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was seen in the mean mechanical axis alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal alignment (α and β angles) and sagittal alignment (γ and δ angles) of the femoral and tibial components between the two groups. Though the percentage of outliers for mechanical axis alignment was lower in the PNA-TKA group than in the CIN-TKA group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). The number of outliers for the femoral and tibial component positioning in coronal and sagittal planes was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.68) was noted between the two groups with respect to the Oxford Knee Score. The mean surgical time was greater in the PNA-TKA group by 11 minutes, which was statistically significantly longer (p = 0.018). Complications were seen in 6.89% of the cases in the CIN-TKA group, while none in the PNA-TKA group. CONCLUSIONS: The accurate mechanical axis alignment and component positioning can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation, so the use of PNA system, which adds to the surgical cost, is questionable. Also, equally good short-term functional outcome can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation. The surgeon must be accustomed with the instrumentation of the PNA system, or it adds to the surgical time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8380527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83805272021-09-04 Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Pawar, Prashant Naik, Lokesh Sahu, Dipit Bagaria, Vaibhav Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUD: Optimal placement of the components and achieving a neutral mechanical axis are the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different computerised navigation systems are presently used for these purposes. This aim of this study was to compare the pinless navigation (PNA) TKA performed using iAssist with the conventional instrumented (CIN) TKA in terms of functional and radiological outcomes. METHODS: A total of 100 knees operated for TKA by a single surgeon were studied retrospectively for a period of 2 years. Weight-bearing postoperative radiographs of the knees along with scanograms of the lower limbs were used for measurements of component positioning, mechanical axis alignment, and number of outliers. Oxford knee scoring was used for functional analysis. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was seen in the mean mechanical axis alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal alignment (α and β angles) and sagittal alignment (γ and δ angles) of the femoral and tibial components between the two groups. Though the percentage of outliers for mechanical axis alignment was lower in the PNA-TKA group than in the CIN-TKA group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). The number of outliers for the femoral and tibial component positioning in coronal and sagittal planes was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.68) was noted between the two groups with respect to the Oxford Knee Score. The mean surgical time was greater in the PNA-TKA group by 11 minutes, which was statistically significantly longer (p = 0.018). Complications were seen in 6.89% of the cases in the CIN-TKA group, while none in the PNA-TKA group. CONCLUSIONS: The accurate mechanical axis alignment and component positioning can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation, so the use of PNA system, which adds to the surgical cost, is questionable. Also, equally good short-term functional outcome can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation. The surgeon must be accustomed with the instrumentation of the PNA system, or it adds to the surgical time. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2021-09 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8380527/ /pubmed/34484629 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios20226 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pawar, Prashant
Naik, Lokesh
Sahu, Dipit
Bagaria, Vaibhav
Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
title Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort comparative study of pinless navigation system versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34484629
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios20226
work_keys_str_mv AT pawarprashant comparativestudyofpinlessnavigationsystemversusconventionalinstrumentationintotalkneearthroplasty
AT naiklokesh comparativestudyofpinlessnavigationsystemversusconventionalinstrumentationintotalkneearthroplasty
AT sahudipit comparativestudyofpinlessnavigationsystemversusconventionalinstrumentationintotalkneearthroplasty
AT bagariavaibhav comparativestudyofpinlessnavigationsystemversusconventionalinstrumentationintotalkneearthroplasty