Cargando…

Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model

A novel modified version of the Wells-Riley model was used to estimate the impact of relative humidity (RH) on the removal of respiratory droplets containing the SARS-CoV-2 virus by deposition through gravitational settling and its inactivation by biological decay; the effect of RH on susceptibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aganovic, Amar, Bi, Yang, Cao, Guangyu, Drangsholt, Finn, Kurnitski, Jarek, Wargocki, Pawel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34456454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108278
_version_ 1783741220546150400
author Aganovic, Amar
Bi, Yang
Cao, Guangyu
Drangsholt, Finn
Kurnitski, Jarek
Wargocki, Pawel
author_facet Aganovic, Amar
Bi, Yang
Cao, Guangyu
Drangsholt, Finn
Kurnitski, Jarek
Wargocki, Pawel
author_sort Aganovic, Amar
collection PubMed
description A novel modified version of the Wells-Riley model was used to estimate the impact of relative humidity (RH) on the removal of respiratory droplets containing the SARS-CoV-2 virus by deposition through gravitational settling and its inactivation by biological decay; the effect of RH on susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 was not considered. These effects were compared with the removal achieved by increased ventilation rate with outdoor air. Modeling was performed assuming that the infected person talked continuously for 60 and 120 min. The results of modeling showed that the relative impact of RH on the infection risk depended on the ventilation rate and the size range of virus-laden droplets. A ventilation rate of 0.5 ACH, the change of RH between 20% and 53% was predicted to have a small effect on the infection risk, while at a ventilation rate of 6 ACH this change had nearly no effect. On the contrary, increasing the ventilation rate from 0.5 ACH to 6 ACH was predicted to decrease the infection risk by half which is remarkably larger effect compared with that predicted for RH. It is thus concluded that increasing the ventilation rate is more beneficial for reducing the airborne levels of SARS-CoV-2 than changing indoor RH. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The present results show that humidification to moderate levels of 40%–60% RH should not be expected to provide a significant reduction in infection risk caused by SARS-CoV-2, hence installing and running humidifiers may not be an efficient solution to reduce the risk of COVID-19 disease in indoor spaces. The results do however confirm that ventilation has a key role in controlling SARS-CoV-2 virus concentration in the air providing considerably higher benefits. The modified model developed in the present work can be used by public health experts, engineers, and epidemiologists when selecting different measures to reduce the infection risk from SARS-CoV-2 indoors allowing informed decisions concerning indoor environmental control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8380559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83805592021-08-23 Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model Aganovic, Amar Bi, Yang Cao, Guangyu Drangsholt, Finn Kurnitski, Jarek Wargocki, Pawel Build Environ Article A novel modified version of the Wells-Riley model was used to estimate the impact of relative humidity (RH) on the removal of respiratory droplets containing the SARS-CoV-2 virus by deposition through gravitational settling and its inactivation by biological decay; the effect of RH on susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 was not considered. These effects were compared with the removal achieved by increased ventilation rate with outdoor air. Modeling was performed assuming that the infected person talked continuously for 60 and 120 min. The results of modeling showed that the relative impact of RH on the infection risk depended on the ventilation rate and the size range of virus-laden droplets. A ventilation rate of 0.5 ACH, the change of RH between 20% and 53% was predicted to have a small effect on the infection risk, while at a ventilation rate of 6 ACH this change had nearly no effect. On the contrary, increasing the ventilation rate from 0.5 ACH to 6 ACH was predicted to decrease the infection risk by half which is remarkably larger effect compared with that predicted for RH. It is thus concluded that increasing the ventilation rate is more beneficial for reducing the airborne levels of SARS-CoV-2 than changing indoor RH. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The present results show that humidification to moderate levels of 40%–60% RH should not be expected to provide a significant reduction in infection risk caused by SARS-CoV-2, hence installing and running humidifiers may not be an efficient solution to reduce the risk of COVID-19 disease in indoor spaces. The results do however confirm that ventilation has a key role in controlling SARS-CoV-2 virus concentration in the air providing considerably higher benefits. The modified model developed in the present work can be used by public health experts, engineers, and epidemiologists when selecting different measures to reduce the infection risk from SARS-CoV-2 indoors allowing informed decisions concerning indoor environmental control. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-11 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8380559/ /pubmed/34456454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108278 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Aganovic, Amar
Bi, Yang
Cao, Guangyu
Drangsholt, Finn
Kurnitski, Jarek
Wargocki, Pawel
Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model
title Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model
title_full Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model
title_fullStr Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model
title_short Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model
title_sort estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on sars-cov-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the wells-riley model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34456454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108278
work_keys_str_mv AT aganovicamar estimatingtheimpactofindoorrelativehumidityonsarscov2airbornetransmissionriskusinganewmodificationofthewellsrileymodel
AT biyang estimatingtheimpactofindoorrelativehumidityonsarscov2airbornetransmissionriskusinganewmodificationofthewellsrileymodel
AT caoguangyu estimatingtheimpactofindoorrelativehumidityonsarscov2airbornetransmissionriskusinganewmodificationofthewellsrileymodel
AT drangsholtfinn estimatingtheimpactofindoorrelativehumidityonsarscov2airbornetransmissionriskusinganewmodificationofthewellsrileymodel
AT kurnitskijarek estimatingtheimpactofindoorrelativehumidityonsarscov2airbornetransmissionriskusinganewmodificationofthewellsrileymodel
AT wargockipawel estimatingtheimpactofindoorrelativehumidityonsarscov2airbornetransmissionriskusinganewmodificationofthewellsrileymodel