Cargando…
Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research
PURPOSE: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized method to assess somatosensory function. The collection of qualitative information, during the QST procedure, could be an interesting way to facilitate the characterization of altered sensory perception and the identification of different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434059 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S301655 |
_version_ | 1783741235617333248 |
---|---|
author | Bordeleau, Martine Léonard, Guillaume Gauthier, Lynn Ferland, Catherine Estelle Backonja, Miroslav Vollert, Jan Marchand, Serge Jackson, Philip Cantin, Léo Prud’Homme, Michel |
author_facet | Bordeleau, Martine Léonard, Guillaume Gauthier, Lynn Ferland, Catherine Estelle Backonja, Miroslav Vollert, Jan Marchand, Serge Jackson, Philip Cantin, Léo Prud’Homme, Michel |
author_sort | Bordeleau, Martine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized method to assess somatosensory function. The collection of qualitative information, during the QST procedure, could be an interesting way to facilitate the characterization of altered sensory perception and the identification of different pain phenotypes. The aims of this study were 1) to classify qualitative fieldnotes of sensory abnormalities collected during an independent QST study, and 2) to generate a qualitative interview guide that could be included in the traditional QST procedure as a step towards the implementation of a mixed methods approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: QST data were collected from 48 chronic neuropathic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Three body areas, with or without SCS, were tested: the painful limb targeted by SCS, the contralateral area, and the ipsilateral upper limb. After each trial of each QST modality, patients were encouraged to report any sensory abnormalities they could identify with a pain quality scale or using their own words. RESULTS: Qualitative self-reported sensory abnormalities were dichotomized into two groups: altered sensory intensities and altered sensory perceptions. Altered sensory intensities were classified as sensory loss or sensory gain subgroups. Altered sensory perceptions were classified as paresthesia and dysesthesia subgroups Overall, 630 qualitative fieldnotes of altered sensations were collected: 385 on the painful limb, 173 at the contralateral area, and 72 at the ipsilateral upper limb. Based on these qualitative data, we propose a standardized method to collect qualitative data involving 9 open- and close-ended questions and 21 codes. CONCLUSION: Our findings have highlighted the value of qualitative sensory evaluation during QST and constitute an important milestone in the development of a mixed methods protocol in phenotyping research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8380625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83806252021-08-24 Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research Bordeleau, Martine Léonard, Guillaume Gauthier, Lynn Ferland, Catherine Estelle Backonja, Miroslav Vollert, Jan Marchand, Serge Jackson, Philip Cantin, Léo Prud’Homme, Michel J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized method to assess somatosensory function. The collection of qualitative information, during the QST procedure, could be an interesting way to facilitate the characterization of altered sensory perception and the identification of different pain phenotypes. The aims of this study were 1) to classify qualitative fieldnotes of sensory abnormalities collected during an independent QST study, and 2) to generate a qualitative interview guide that could be included in the traditional QST procedure as a step towards the implementation of a mixed methods approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: QST data were collected from 48 chronic neuropathic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Three body areas, with or without SCS, were tested: the painful limb targeted by SCS, the contralateral area, and the ipsilateral upper limb. After each trial of each QST modality, patients were encouraged to report any sensory abnormalities they could identify with a pain quality scale or using their own words. RESULTS: Qualitative self-reported sensory abnormalities were dichotomized into two groups: altered sensory intensities and altered sensory perceptions. Altered sensory intensities were classified as sensory loss or sensory gain subgroups. Altered sensory perceptions were classified as paresthesia and dysesthesia subgroups Overall, 630 qualitative fieldnotes of altered sensations were collected: 385 on the painful limb, 173 at the contralateral area, and 72 at the ipsilateral upper limb. Based on these qualitative data, we propose a standardized method to collect qualitative data involving 9 open- and close-ended questions and 21 codes. CONCLUSION: Our findings have highlighted the value of qualitative sensory evaluation during QST and constitute an important milestone in the development of a mixed methods protocol in phenotyping research. Dove 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8380625/ /pubmed/34434059 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S301655 Text en © 2021 Bordeleau et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bordeleau, Martine Léonard, Guillaume Gauthier, Lynn Ferland, Catherine Estelle Backonja, Miroslav Vollert, Jan Marchand, Serge Jackson, Philip Cantin, Léo Prud’Homme, Michel Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research |
title | Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research |
title_full | Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research |
title_fullStr | Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research |
title_short | Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research |
title_sort | classification of qualitative fieldnotes collected during quantitative sensory testing: a step towards the development of a new mixed methods approach in pain research |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434059 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S301655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bordeleaumartine classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT leonardguillaume classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT gauthierlynn classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT ferlandcatherineestelle classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT backonjamiroslav classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT vollertjan classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT marchandserge classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT jacksonphilip classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT cantinleo classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch AT prudhommemichel classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch |