Cargando…

Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research

PURPOSE: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized method to assess somatosensory function. The collection of qualitative information, during the QST procedure, could be an interesting way to facilitate the characterization of altered sensory perception and the identification of different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bordeleau, Martine, Léonard, Guillaume, Gauthier, Lynn, Ferland, Catherine Estelle, Backonja, Miroslav, Vollert, Jan, Marchand, Serge, Jackson, Philip, Cantin, Léo, Prud’Homme, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434059
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S301655
_version_ 1783741235617333248
author Bordeleau, Martine
Léonard, Guillaume
Gauthier, Lynn
Ferland, Catherine Estelle
Backonja, Miroslav
Vollert, Jan
Marchand, Serge
Jackson, Philip
Cantin, Léo
Prud’Homme, Michel
author_facet Bordeleau, Martine
Léonard, Guillaume
Gauthier, Lynn
Ferland, Catherine Estelle
Backonja, Miroslav
Vollert, Jan
Marchand, Serge
Jackson, Philip
Cantin, Léo
Prud’Homme, Michel
author_sort Bordeleau, Martine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized method to assess somatosensory function. The collection of qualitative information, during the QST procedure, could be an interesting way to facilitate the characterization of altered sensory perception and the identification of different pain phenotypes. The aims of this study were 1) to classify qualitative fieldnotes of sensory abnormalities collected during an independent QST study, and 2) to generate a qualitative interview guide that could be included in the traditional QST procedure as a step towards the implementation of a mixed methods approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: QST data were collected from 48 chronic neuropathic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Three body areas, with or without SCS, were tested: the painful limb targeted by SCS, the contralateral area, and the ipsilateral upper limb. After each trial of each QST modality, patients were encouraged to report any sensory abnormalities they could identify with a pain quality scale or using their own words. RESULTS: Qualitative self-reported sensory abnormalities were dichotomized into two groups: altered sensory intensities and altered sensory perceptions. Altered sensory intensities were classified as sensory loss or sensory gain subgroups. Altered sensory perceptions were classified as paresthesia and dysesthesia subgroups Overall, 630 qualitative fieldnotes of altered sensations were collected: 385 on the painful limb, 173 at the contralateral area, and 72 at the ipsilateral upper limb. Based on these qualitative data, we propose a standardized method to collect qualitative data involving 9 open- and close-ended questions and 21 codes. CONCLUSION: Our findings have highlighted the value of qualitative sensory evaluation during QST and constitute an important milestone in the development of a mixed methods protocol in phenotyping research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8380625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83806252021-08-24 Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research Bordeleau, Martine Léonard, Guillaume Gauthier, Lynn Ferland, Catherine Estelle Backonja, Miroslav Vollert, Jan Marchand, Serge Jackson, Philip Cantin, Léo Prud’Homme, Michel J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized method to assess somatosensory function. The collection of qualitative information, during the QST procedure, could be an interesting way to facilitate the characterization of altered sensory perception and the identification of different pain phenotypes. The aims of this study were 1) to classify qualitative fieldnotes of sensory abnormalities collected during an independent QST study, and 2) to generate a qualitative interview guide that could be included in the traditional QST procedure as a step towards the implementation of a mixed methods approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: QST data were collected from 48 chronic neuropathic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Three body areas, with or without SCS, were tested: the painful limb targeted by SCS, the contralateral area, and the ipsilateral upper limb. After each trial of each QST modality, patients were encouraged to report any sensory abnormalities they could identify with a pain quality scale or using their own words. RESULTS: Qualitative self-reported sensory abnormalities were dichotomized into two groups: altered sensory intensities and altered sensory perceptions. Altered sensory intensities were classified as sensory loss or sensory gain subgroups. Altered sensory perceptions were classified as paresthesia and dysesthesia subgroups Overall, 630 qualitative fieldnotes of altered sensations were collected: 385 on the painful limb, 173 at the contralateral area, and 72 at the ipsilateral upper limb. Based on these qualitative data, we propose a standardized method to collect qualitative data involving 9 open- and close-ended questions and 21 codes. CONCLUSION: Our findings have highlighted the value of qualitative sensory evaluation during QST and constitute an important milestone in the development of a mixed methods protocol in phenotyping research. Dove 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8380625/ /pubmed/34434059 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S301655 Text en © 2021 Bordeleau et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bordeleau, Martine
Léonard, Guillaume
Gauthier, Lynn
Ferland, Catherine Estelle
Backonja, Miroslav
Vollert, Jan
Marchand, Serge
Jackson, Philip
Cantin, Léo
Prud’Homme, Michel
Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research
title Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research
title_full Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research
title_fullStr Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research
title_short Classification of Qualitative Fieldnotes Collected During Quantitative Sensory Testing: A Step Towards the Development of a New Mixed Methods Approach in Pain Research
title_sort classification of qualitative fieldnotes collected during quantitative sensory testing: a step towards the development of a new mixed methods approach in pain research
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8380625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434059
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S301655
work_keys_str_mv AT bordeleaumartine classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT leonardguillaume classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT gauthierlynn classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT ferlandcatherineestelle classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT backonjamiroslav classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT vollertjan classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT marchandserge classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT jacksonphilip classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT cantinleo classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch
AT prudhommemichel classificationofqualitativefieldnotescollectedduringquantitativesensorytestingasteptowardsthedevelopmentofanewmixedmethodsapproachinpainresearch