Cargando…
In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl
Biological control using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. is a prospective alternative technique to overcome plant parasitic nematodes infection. So, the current study was conducted in vitro on five egg-masses, 100 free eggs and 100 infective juveniles (IJs) of Meloidogyne in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34466061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.078 |
_version_ | 1783741293490339840 |
---|---|
author | Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M. Shahen, Mohamed Sayed, Samy Kesba, Hosny Ansari, Mohammad Javed El-Ashry, Ramadan M. Aioub, Ahmed A.A. Salma, Ali S.A. Eldeeb, Ahmed M. |
author_facet | Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M. Shahen, Mohamed Sayed, Samy Kesba, Hosny Ansari, Mohammad Javed El-Ashry, Ramadan M. Aioub, Ahmed A.A. Salma, Ali S.A. Eldeeb, Ahmed M. |
author_sort | Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological control using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. is a prospective alternative technique to overcome plant parasitic nematodes infection. So, the current study was conducted in vitro on five egg-masses, 100 free eggs and 100 infective juveniles (IJs) of Meloidogyne incognita as well as greenhouse treatments on Luffa aegyptiaca L. to evaluate the nematicidal potential of six strains belong to Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. as compared to oxamyl. Results showed that the inhibitory effect and juvenile mortality varied according to bacteria species, strains and exposure time. All the tested bacteria significantly (P ≤ 0.05) inhibited egg hatching and increased juvenile mortality in vitro. After 3 days of treatment, Pseudomonas spp. were more effective against eggs (48.31to 55.15%) and IJs (20.98 to 25.30%) than Serratia spp. (44.55 to 49.75% with eggs) and (19.06 to 21.61% with IJs), respectively. In the pot experiment, Luffa aegyptiaca L. treated with Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. displayed significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) levels of growth (as indicated by root length, fresh roots weight and fresh shoots weight) compared to control plants and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) suppressed galling (number of galls) and reproduction (as indicated by number of egg-masses on roots and number of eggs and juveniles in pot soil). Meanwhile, among the treated plants, Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. gave the best results in shoot weight of pots infected by eggs of M. incognita than those infected with IJs as compared with positive control. While, oxamyl treatment gave the best results in pots infected by eggs and IJs. The lowest galling (gall index), number of eggs and juveniles in soil was observed in the treatment with mixture of Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. as well as, enhanced growth of sponge gourd more than application each of them alone. Pots treated with oxamyl overwhelmed those treated with mixture of Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8381056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83810562021-08-30 In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M. Shahen, Mohamed Sayed, Samy Kesba, Hosny Ansari, Mohammad Javed El-Ashry, Ramadan M. Aioub, Ahmed A.A. Salma, Ali S.A. Eldeeb, Ahmed M. Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article Biological control using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. is a prospective alternative technique to overcome plant parasitic nematodes infection. So, the current study was conducted in vitro on five egg-masses, 100 free eggs and 100 infective juveniles (IJs) of Meloidogyne incognita as well as greenhouse treatments on Luffa aegyptiaca L. to evaluate the nematicidal potential of six strains belong to Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. as compared to oxamyl. Results showed that the inhibitory effect and juvenile mortality varied according to bacteria species, strains and exposure time. All the tested bacteria significantly (P ≤ 0.05) inhibited egg hatching and increased juvenile mortality in vitro. After 3 days of treatment, Pseudomonas spp. were more effective against eggs (48.31to 55.15%) and IJs (20.98 to 25.30%) than Serratia spp. (44.55 to 49.75% with eggs) and (19.06 to 21.61% with IJs), respectively. In the pot experiment, Luffa aegyptiaca L. treated with Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. displayed significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) levels of growth (as indicated by root length, fresh roots weight and fresh shoots weight) compared to control plants and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) suppressed galling (number of galls) and reproduction (as indicated by number of egg-masses on roots and number of eggs and juveniles in pot soil). Meanwhile, among the treated plants, Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. gave the best results in shoot weight of pots infected by eggs of M. incognita than those infected with IJs as compared with positive control. While, oxamyl treatment gave the best results in pots infected by eggs and IJs. The lowest galling (gall index), number of eggs and juveniles in soil was observed in the treatment with mixture of Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. as well as, enhanced growth of sponge gourd more than application each of them alone. Pots treated with oxamyl overwhelmed those treated with mixture of Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Elsevier 2021-09 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8381056/ /pubmed/34466061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.078 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M. Shahen, Mohamed Sayed, Samy Kesba, Hosny Ansari, Mohammad Javed El-Ashry, Ramadan M. Aioub, Ahmed A.A. Salma, Ali S.A. Eldeeb, Ahmed M. In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl |
title | In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl |
title_full | In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl |
title_fullStr | In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl |
title_full_unstemmed | In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl |
title_short | In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl |
title_sort | in vivo and in vitro management of meloidogyne incognita (tylenchida: heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, pseudomonas spp. and serratia spp. compared with oxamyl |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34466061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelaalelasyedm invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl AT shahenmohamed invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl AT sayedsamy invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl AT kesbahosny invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl AT ansarimohammadjaved invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl AT elashryramadanm invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl AT aioubahmedaa invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl AT salmaalisa invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl AT eldeebahmedm invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl |