Cargando…

In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl

Biological control using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. is a prospective alternative technique to overcome plant parasitic nematodes infection. So, the current study was conducted in vitro on five egg-masses, 100 free eggs and 100 infective juveniles (IJs) of Meloidogyne in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M., Shahen, Mohamed, Sayed, Samy, Kesba, Hosny, Ansari, Mohammad Javed, El-Ashry, Ramadan M., Aioub, Ahmed A.A., Salma, Ali S.A., Eldeeb, Ahmed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34466061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.078
_version_ 1783741293490339840
author Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M.
Shahen, Mohamed
Sayed, Samy
Kesba, Hosny
Ansari, Mohammad Javed
El-Ashry, Ramadan M.
Aioub, Ahmed A.A.
Salma, Ali S.A.
Eldeeb, Ahmed M.
author_facet Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M.
Shahen, Mohamed
Sayed, Samy
Kesba, Hosny
Ansari, Mohammad Javed
El-Ashry, Ramadan M.
Aioub, Ahmed A.A.
Salma, Ali S.A.
Eldeeb, Ahmed M.
author_sort Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M.
collection PubMed
description Biological control using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. is a prospective alternative technique to overcome plant parasitic nematodes infection. So, the current study was conducted in vitro on five egg-masses, 100 free eggs and 100 infective juveniles (IJs) of Meloidogyne incognita as well as greenhouse treatments on Luffa aegyptiaca L. to evaluate the nematicidal potential of six strains belong to Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. as compared to oxamyl. Results showed that the inhibitory effect and juvenile mortality varied according to bacteria species, strains and exposure time. All the tested bacteria significantly (P ≤ 0.05) inhibited egg hatching and increased juvenile mortality in vitro. After 3 days of treatment, Pseudomonas spp. were more effective against eggs (48.31to 55.15%) and IJs (20.98 to 25.30%) than Serratia spp. (44.55 to 49.75% with eggs) and (19.06 to 21.61% with IJs), respectively. In the pot experiment, Luffa aegyptiaca L. treated with Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. displayed significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) levels of growth (as indicated by root length, fresh roots weight and fresh shoots weight) compared to control plants and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) suppressed galling (number of galls) and reproduction (as indicated by number of egg-masses on roots and number of eggs and juveniles in pot soil). Meanwhile, among the treated plants, Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. gave the best results in shoot weight of pots infected by eggs of M. incognita than those infected with IJs as compared with positive control. While, oxamyl treatment gave the best results in pots infected by eggs and IJs. The lowest galling (gall index), number of eggs and juveniles in soil was observed in the treatment with mixture of Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. as well as, enhanced growth of sponge gourd more than application each of them alone. Pots treated with oxamyl overwhelmed those treated with mixture of Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8381056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83810562021-08-30 In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M. Shahen, Mohamed Sayed, Samy Kesba, Hosny Ansari, Mohammad Javed El-Ashry, Ramadan M. Aioub, Ahmed A.A. Salma, Ali S.A. Eldeeb, Ahmed M. Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article Biological control using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. is a prospective alternative technique to overcome plant parasitic nematodes infection. So, the current study was conducted in vitro on five egg-masses, 100 free eggs and 100 infective juveniles (IJs) of Meloidogyne incognita as well as greenhouse treatments on Luffa aegyptiaca L. to evaluate the nematicidal potential of six strains belong to Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. as compared to oxamyl. Results showed that the inhibitory effect and juvenile mortality varied according to bacteria species, strains and exposure time. All the tested bacteria significantly (P ≤ 0.05) inhibited egg hatching and increased juvenile mortality in vitro. After 3 days of treatment, Pseudomonas spp. were more effective against eggs (48.31to 55.15%) and IJs (20.98 to 25.30%) than Serratia spp. (44.55 to 49.75% with eggs) and (19.06 to 21.61% with IJs), respectively. In the pot experiment, Luffa aegyptiaca L. treated with Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. displayed significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) levels of growth (as indicated by root length, fresh roots weight and fresh shoots weight) compared to control plants and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) suppressed galling (number of galls) and reproduction (as indicated by number of egg-masses on roots and number of eggs and juveniles in pot soil). Meanwhile, among the treated plants, Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. gave the best results in shoot weight of pots infected by eggs of M. incognita than those infected with IJs as compared with positive control. While, oxamyl treatment gave the best results in pots infected by eggs and IJs. The lowest galling (gall index), number of eggs and juveniles in soil was observed in the treatment with mixture of Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. as well as, enhanced growth of sponge gourd more than application each of them alone. Pots treated with oxamyl overwhelmed those treated with mixture of Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Elsevier 2021-09 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8381056/ /pubmed/34466061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.078 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Abd El-Aal, Elasyed M.
Shahen, Mohamed
Sayed, Samy
Kesba, Hosny
Ansari, Mohammad Javed
El-Ashry, Ramadan M.
Aioub, Ahmed A.A.
Salma, Ali S.A.
Eldeeb, Ahmed M.
In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl
title In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl
title_full In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl
title_fullStr In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl
title_full_unstemmed In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl
title_short In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia spp. compared with oxamyl
title_sort in vivo and in vitro management of meloidogyne incognita (tylenchida: heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, pseudomonas spp. and serratia spp. compared with oxamyl
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34466061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.078
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelaalelasyedm invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl
AT shahenmohamed invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl
AT sayedsamy invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl
AT kesbahosny invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl
AT ansarimohammadjaved invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl
AT elashryramadanm invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl
AT aioubahmedaa invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl
AT salmaalisa invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl
AT eldeebahmedm invivoandinvitromanagementofmeloidogyneincognitatylenchidaheteroderidaeusingrhizospherebacteriapseudomonassppandserratiasppcomparedwithoxamyl