Cargando…

Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience

Background: Pilonidal disease (PD) represents one of the most common proctological diseases in young adults. Although several approaches to treating PD have been described, there is still a lack of agreement on which is the best. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of endosc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallo, Gaetano, Carpino, Antonio, De Paola, Gilda, Fulginiti, Serena, Novelli, Eugenio, Ferrari, Francesco, Sammarco, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.723050
_version_ 1783741334510632960
author Gallo, Gaetano
Carpino, Antonio
De Paola, Gilda
Fulginiti, Serena
Novelli, Eugenio
Ferrari, Francesco
Sammarco, Giuseppe
author_facet Gallo, Gaetano
Carpino, Antonio
De Paola, Gilda
Fulginiti, Serena
Novelli, Eugenio
Ferrari, Francesco
Sammarco, Giuseppe
author_sort Gallo, Gaetano
collection PubMed
description Background: Pilonidal disease (PD) represents one of the most common proctological diseases in young adults. Although several approaches to treating PD have been described, there is still a lack of agreement on which is the best. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) at a tertiary care academic center. Methods: Between June 2017 and January 2021, a total of 32 patients [12 women (37.5%) and 20 men (62.5%)] with a mean age of 29.22 ± 12.98 years were treated with EPSiT. Pre- and post-operative symptoms were assessed with a score of 0–5. Success was defined as the absence of any subjective symptoms, as well as by complete post-operative wound healing. Results: Most of the patients had a midline external opening (17/32; 53.1%), with a mean number of external openings of 2.41 (1–4) ± 1.04. The median post-operative pain score was 0, and the mean follow-up period was 22 (4–42) ± 11.49 months. The time to wound healing was reduced in patients with one opening (28.14 ± 4.06 days) compared to patients with two or more openings (33.64 ± 7.3 days) (p = 0.067). The mean operative time was longer in patients who subsequently had a recurrence (41.75 ± 6.24 vs. 34.18 ± 6.24 min; p = 0.031). The overall success rate was 87.5% (28/32), and the mean time to recurrence was 3.25 (2–5) ± 1.26 months. Conclusions: EPSiT represents a viable option for the treatment of PD. More evidence and a longer follow-up period are needed to validate the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8381271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83812712021-08-24 Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience Gallo, Gaetano Carpino, Antonio De Paola, Gilda Fulginiti, Serena Novelli, Eugenio Ferrari, Francesco Sammarco, Giuseppe Front Surg Surgery Background: Pilonidal disease (PD) represents one of the most common proctological diseases in young adults. Although several approaches to treating PD have been described, there is still a lack of agreement on which is the best. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) at a tertiary care academic center. Methods: Between June 2017 and January 2021, a total of 32 patients [12 women (37.5%) and 20 men (62.5%)] with a mean age of 29.22 ± 12.98 years were treated with EPSiT. Pre- and post-operative symptoms were assessed with a score of 0–5. Success was defined as the absence of any subjective symptoms, as well as by complete post-operative wound healing. Results: Most of the patients had a midline external opening (17/32; 53.1%), with a mean number of external openings of 2.41 (1–4) ± 1.04. The median post-operative pain score was 0, and the mean follow-up period was 22 (4–42) ± 11.49 months. The time to wound healing was reduced in patients with one opening (28.14 ± 4.06 days) compared to patients with two or more openings (33.64 ± 7.3 days) (p = 0.067). The mean operative time was longer in patients who subsequently had a recurrence (41.75 ± 6.24 vs. 34.18 ± 6.24 min; p = 0.031). The overall success rate was 87.5% (28/32), and the mean time to recurrence was 3.25 (2–5) ± 1.26 months. Conclusions: EPSiT represents a viable option for the treatment of PD. More evidence and a longer follow-up period are needed to validate the results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8381271/ /pubmed/34434960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.723050 Text en Copyright © 2021 Gallo, Carpino, De Paola, Fulginiti, Novelli, Ferrari and Sammarco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Gallo, Gaetano
Carpino, Antonio
De Paola, Gilda
Fulginiti, Serena
Novelli, Eugenio
Ferrari, Francesco
Sammarco, Giuseppe
Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience
title Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience
title_full Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience
title_fullStr Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience
title_short Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience
title_sort endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: a tertiary care academic center experience
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.723050
work_keys_str_mv AT gallogaetano endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentatertiarycareacademiccenterexperience
AT carpinoantonio endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentatertiarycareacademiccenterexperience
AT depaolagilda endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentatertiarycareacademiccenterexperience
AT fulginitiserena endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentatertiarycareacademiccenterexperience
AT novellieugenio endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentatertiarycareacademiccenterexperience
AT ferrarifrancesco endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentatertiarycareacademiccenterexperience
AT sammarcogiuseppe endoscopicpilonidalsinustreatmentatertiarycareacademiccenterexperience