Cargando…
Casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: The forearm is the most common fracture location in children, with an increasing incidence. Displaced forearm shaft fractures have traditionally been treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Diaphyseal fractures in children have poor remodelling capacity. Malunion can cau...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048248 |
_version_ | 1783741340552527872 |
---|---|
author | Grahn, Petra Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko Nietosvaara, Yrjänä Syvänen, Johanna Salonen, Anne Ahonen, Matti Helenius, Ilkka |
author_facet | Grahn, Petra Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko Nietosvaara, Yrjänä Syvänen, Johanna Salonen, Anne Ahonen, Matti Helenius, Ilkka |
author_sort | Grahn, Petra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The forearm is the most common fracture location in children, with an increasing incidence. Displaced forearm shaft fractures have traditionally been treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Diaphyseal fractures in children have poor remodelling capacity. Malunion can cause permanent cosmetic and functional disability. Internal fixation with flexible intramedullary nails has gained increasing popularity, without evidence of a better outcome compared with closed reduction and cast immobilisation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised superiority trial comparing closed reduction and cast immobilisation to flexible intramedullary nails in children aged 7–12 years with >10° of angulation and/or >10 mm of shortening in displaced both bone forearm shaft fractures (AO-paediatric classification: 22D/2.1–5.2). A total of 78 patients with minimum 2 years of expected growth left are randomised in 1:1 ratio to either treatment group. The study has a parallel non-randomised patient preference arm. Both treatments are performed under general anaesthesia. In the cast group a long arm cast is applied for 6 weeks. The flexible intramedullary nail group is immobilised in a collar and cuff sling for 4 weeks. Data are collected at baseline and at each follow-up until 1 year. Primary outcome is (1) PROMIS paediatric upper extremity and (2) forearm pronation-supination range of motion at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes are Quick DASH, Paediatric Pain Questionnaire, Cosmetic Visual Analogue Scale, wrist and elbow range of motion as well as any complications and costs of treatment. We hypothesise that flexible intramedullary nailing results in a superior outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We have received ethical board approval (number: 78/1801/2020) and permissions to conduct the study from all five participating university hospitals. Informed consent is obtained from the parent(s). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04664517. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8381323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83813232021-09-08 Casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Grahn, Petra Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko Nietosvaara, Yrjänä Syvänen, Johanna Salonen, Anne Ahonen, Matti Helenius, Ilkka BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: The forearm is the most common fracture location in children, with an increasing incidence. Displaced forearm shaft fractures have traditionally been treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Diaphyseal fractures in children have poor remodelling capacity. Malunion can cause permanent cosmetic and functional disability. Internal fixation with flexible intramedullary nails has gained increasing popularity, without evidence of a better outcome compared with closed reduction and cast immobilisation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised superiority trial comparing closed reduction and cast immobilisation to flexible intramedullary nails in children aged 7–12 years with >10° of angulation and/or >10 mm of shortening in displaced both bone forearm shaft fractures (AO-paediatric classification: 22D/2.1–5.2). A total of 78 patients with minimum 2 years of expected growth left are randomised in 1:1 ratio to either treatment group. The study has a parallel non-randomised patient preference arm. Both treatments are performed under general anaesthesia. In the cast group a long arm cast is applied for 6 weeks. The flexible intramedullary nail group is immobilised in a collar and cuff sling for 4 weeks. Data are collected at baseline and at each follow-up until 1 year. Primary outcome is (1) PROMIS paediatric upper extremity and (2) forearm pronation-supination range of motion at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes are Quick DASH, Paediatric Pain Questionnaire, Cosmetic Visual Analogue Scale, wrist and elbow range of motion as well as any complications and costs of treatment. We hypothesise that flexible intramedullary nailing results in a superior outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We have received ethical board approval (number: 78/1801/2020) and permissions to conduct the study from all five participating university hospitals. Informed consent is obtained from the parent(s). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04664517. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8381323/ /pubmed/34417215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048248 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Paediatrics Grahn, Petra Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko Nietosvaara, Yrjänä Syvänen, Johanna Salonen, Anne Ahonen, Matti Helenius, Ilkka Casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | casting versus flexible intramedullary nailing in displaced forearm shaft fractures in children aged 7–12 years: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Paediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grahnpetra castingversusflexibleintramedullarynailingindisplacedforearmshaftfracturesinchildrenaged712yearsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sinikumpujuhajaakko castingversusflexibleintramedullarynailingindisplacedforearmshaftfracturesinchildrenaged712yearsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nietosvaarayrjana castingversusflexibleintramedullarynailingindisplacedforearmshaftfracturesinchildrenaged712yearsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT syvanenjohanna castingversusflexibleintramedullarynailingindisplacedforearmshaftfracturesinchildrenaged712yearsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT salonenanne castingversusflexibleintramedullarynailingindisplacedforearmshaftfracturesinchildrenaged712yearsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ahonenmatti castingversusflexibleintramedullarynailingindisplacedforearmshaftfracturesinchildrenaged712yearsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heleniusilkka castingversusflexibleintramedullarynailingindisplacedforearmshaftfracturesinchildrenaged712yearsastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |