Cargando…
Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study
Introduction: Distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus on optimal management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures would improve...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211038089 |
_version_ | 1783741358902607872 |
---|---|
author | Kurozumi, Taketo Miyamoto, Hideaki Suzuki, Takashi Watanabe, Yoshinobu |
author_facet | Kurozumi, Taketo Miyamoto, Hideaki Suzuki, Takashi Watanabe, Yoshinobu |
author_sort | Kurozumi, Taketo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus on optimal management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures would improve outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients treated for distal radial fractures over a 4-year period at our trauma center were identified, and their medical records were analyzed. Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. All radius fractures were fixed using a volar locking plate. Fourteen ulnar fractures were treated with surgical fixation, and nine were treated conservatively. Data were collected on patient demographics, mechanism of injury, whether it was a closed or open fracture, Gustilo classification, AO/OTA classification, immobilization period, follow-up period, and type of treatment. Physical findings comprising the active range of motion and grip strength and radiological findings, including the ulnar variance compared to the healthy side and bone union, were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, but the arc of dorsi-palmar flexion was more restricted in the operative group than in the conservative group. Other results were not significantly different between the two groups. Discussion: Fixation of distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be challenging, and several studies have shown the validity of conservative treatments. This supports the view that if the distal radius fracture is anatomically and rigidly fixed, distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be successfully managed conservatively. Conclusion: Our results did not show any merit in the simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures. Thus, needless surgery should be avoided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8381409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83814092021-08-24 Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study Kurozumi, Taketo Miyamoto, Hideaki Suzuki, Takashi Watanabe, Yoshinobu Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Original Manuscript Introduction: Distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus on optimal management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures would improve outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients treated for distal radial fractures over a 4-year period at our trauma center were identified, and their medical records were analyzed. Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. All radius fractures were fixed using a volar locking plate. Fourteen ulnar fractures were treated with surgical fixation, and nine were treated conservatively. Data were collected on patient demographics, mechanism of injury, whether it was a closed or open fracture, Gustilo classification, AO/OTA classification, immobilization period, follow-up period, and type of treatment. Physical findings comprising the active range of motion and grip strength and radiological findings, including the ulnar variance compared to the healthy side and bone union, were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, but the arc of dorsi-palmar flexion was more restricted in the operative group than in the conservative group. Other results were not significantly different between the two groups. Discussion: Fixation of distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be challenging, and several studies have shown the validity of conservative treatments. This supports the view that if the distal radius fracture is anatomically and rigidly fixed, distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be successfully managed conservatively. Conclusion: Our results did not show any merit in the simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures. Thus, needless surgery should be avoided. SAGE Publications 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8381409/ /pubmed/34434592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211038089 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Kurozumi, Taketo Miyamoto, Hideaki Suzuki, Takashi Watanabe, Yoshinobu Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures
Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures
Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures
Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures
Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures
Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | does simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures
improve outcomes? a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211038089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kurozumitaketo doessimultaneousfixationofbothdistalradiusanddistalulnarfracturesimproveoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT miyamotohideaki doessimultaneousfixationofbothdistalradiusanddistalulnarfracturesimproveoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT suzukitakashi doessimultaneousfixationofbothdistalradiusanddistalulnarfracturesimproveoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT watanabeyoshinobu doessimultaneousfixationofbothdistalradiusanddistalulnarfracturesimproveoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy |