Cargando…

Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus on optimal management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures would improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurozumi, Taketo, Miyamoto, Hideaki, Suzuki, Takashi, Watanabe, Yoshinobu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211038089
_version_ 1783741358902607872
author Kurozumi, Taketo
Miyamoto, Hideaki
Suzuki, Takashi
Watanabe, Yoshinobu
author_facet Kurozumi, Taketo
Miyamoto, Hideaki
Suzuki, Takashi
Watanabe, Yoshinobu
author_sort Kurozumi, Taketo
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus on optimal management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures would improve outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients treated for distal radial fractures over a 4-year period at our trauma center were identified, and their medical records were analyzed. Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. All radius fractures were fixed using a volar locking plate. Fourteen ulnar fractures were treated with surgical fixation, and nine were treated conservatively. Data were collected on patient demographics, mechanism of injury, whether it was a closed or open fracture, Gustilo classification, AO/OTA classification, immobilization period, follow-up period, and type of treatment. Physical findings comprising the active range of motion and grip strength and radiological findings, including the ulnar variance compared to the healthy side and bone union, were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, but the arc of dorsi-palmar flexion was more restricted in the operative group than in the conservative group. Other results were not significantly different between the two groups. Discussion: Fixation of distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be challenging, and several studies have shown the validity of conservative treatments. This supports the view that if the distal radius fracture is anatomically and rigidly fixed, distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be successfully managed conservatively. Conclusion: Our results did not show any merit in the simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures. Thus, needless surgery should be avoided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8381409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83814092021-08-24 Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study Kurozumi, Taketo Miyamoto, Hideaki Suzuki, Takashi Watanabe, Yoshinobu Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Original Manuscript Introduction: Distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures are often found in conjunction with distal radius fractures. However, there is no consensus on optimal management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures would improve outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients treated for distal radial fractures over a 4-year period at our trauma center were identified, and their medical records were analyzed. Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. All radius fractures were fixed using a volar locking plate. Fourteen ulnar fractures were treated with surgical fixation, and nine were treated conservatively. Data were collected on patient demographics, mechanism of injury, whether it was a closed or open fracture, Gustilo classification, AO/OTA classification, immobilization period, follow-up period, and type of treatment. Physical findings comprising the active range of motion and grip strength and radiological findings, including the ulnar variance compared to the healthy side and bone union, were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, but the arc of dorsi-palmar flexion was more restricted in the operative group than in the conservative group. Other results were not significantly different between the two groups. Discussion: Fixation of distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be challenging, and several studies have shown the validity of conservative treatments. This supports the view that if the distal radius fracture is anatomically and rigidly fixed, distal metaphyseal ulnar fractures can be successfully managed conservatively. Conclusion: Our results did not show any merit in the simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures. Thus, needless surgery should be avoided. SAGE Publications 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8381409/ /pubmed/34434592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211038089 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Kurozumi, Taketo
Miyamoto, Hideaki
Suzuki, Takashi
Watanabe, Yoshinobu
Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Does Simultaneous Fixation of Both Distal Radius and Distal Ulnar Fractures Improve Outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort does simultaneous fixation of both distal radius and distal ulnar fractures improve outcomes? a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593211038089
work_keys_str_mv AT kurozumitaketo doessimultaneousfixationofbothdistalradiusanddistalulnarfracturesimproveoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT miyamotohideaki doessimultaneousfixationofbothdistalradiusanddistalulnarfracturesimproveoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT suzukitakashi doessimultaneousfixationofbothdistalradiusanddistalulnarfracturesimproveoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT watanabeyoshinobu doessimultaneousfixationofbothdistalradiusanddistalulnarfracturesimproveoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy