Cargando…

A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although grading scales for angiography outcomes following cerebral aneurysm treatment with flow diversion have been published, physicians have not widely adopted these scales in practice. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a novel Flow diversion Predictive Scor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Huibin, Luo, Bin, Liu, Jian, Wang, Anxin, Zhang, Hongqi, Li, Tianxiao, Song, Donglei, Zhao, Yuanli, Guan, Sheng, Wang, Yunyan, Feng, Wenfeng, Wang, Yang, Shi, Huaizhang, Liu, Jianmin, Yang, Xinjian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211039336
_version_ 1783741363351715840
author Kang, Huibin
Luo, Bin
Liu, Jian
Wang, Anxin
Zhang, Hongqi
Li, Tianxiao
Song, Donglei
Zhao, Yuanli
Guan, Sheng
Wang, Yunyan
Feng, Wenfeng
Wang, Yang
Shi, Huaizhang
Liu, Jianmin
Yang, Xinjian
author_facet Kang, Huibin
Luo, Bin
Liu, Jian
Wang, Anxin
Zhang, Hongqi
Li, Tianxiao
Song, Donglei
Zhao, Yuanli
Guan, Sheng
Wang, Yunyan
Feng, Wenfeng
Wang, Yang
Shi, Huaizhang
Liu, Jianmin
Yang, Xinjian
author_sort Kang, Huibin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although grading scales for angiography outcomes following cerebral aneurysm treatment with flow diversion have been published, physicians have not widely adopted these scales in practice. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a novel Flow diversion Predictive Score (4F-FPS) grading scale based on previously established scales that is simple and reliable. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms with flow diversion between January 2014 and September 2019. The included patients were randomly divided into the derivation and validation group in a 70/30 ratio, respectively. Aneurysms were classified as incomplete or complete occlusion based on final angiography outcomes. 4F-FPS was derived to predict aneurysm occlusion from multivariate logistic regression analyses in the derivation group and validated with previously published grading scales in the validation group. RESULTS: Overall, 662 patients [mean age, 53.8 years; 72.5% (480/662) female] with 662 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline(TM) flow diverter were included [69.9% (463/662) derivation group, 30.1% (199/662) validation group]. The incidence of aneurysm occlusion was 82.7%. 4F-FPS demonstrated significant discrimination in 10-fold cross validation [mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area, 0.862 ± 0.055] and calibration (Cox & Snell R(2), 0.251; Nagelkerke R(2), 0.413) in the derivation group. The ROC area of 4F-FPS score in both the derivation and validation groups is the largest compared with previously published grading scales/scores (p < 0.05), which shows better sensitivity and specificity. The 4F-FPS score showed excellent prediction, discrimination, and calibration properties. CONCLUSION: The 4F-FPS score is a simple and reliable tool to predict angiography outcome after flow diversion treatment. If widely adopted, it may provide a common language to be used in future reporting of flow diversion results for clinical trials and daily practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03831672
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8381420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83814202021-08-24 A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score Kang, Huibin Luo, Bin Liu, Jian Wang, Anxin Zhang, Hongqi Li, Tianxiao Song, Donglei Zhao, Yuanli Guan, Sheng Wang, Yunyan Feng, Wenfeng Wang, Yang Shi, Huaizhang Liu, Jianmin Yang, Xinjian Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although grading scales for angiography outcomes following cerebral aneurysm treatment with flow diversion have been published, physicians have not widely adopted these scales in practice. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a novel Flow diversion Predictive Score (4F-FPS) grading scale based on previously established scales that is simple and reliable. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms with flow diversion between January 2014 and September 2019. The included patients were randomly divided into the derivation and validation group in a 70/30 ratio, respectively. Aneurysms were classified as incomplete or complete occlusion based on final angiography outcomes. 4F-FPS was derived to predict aneurysm occlusion from multivariate logistic regression analyses in the derivation group and validated with previously published grading scales in the validation group. RESULTS: Overall, 662 patients [mean age, 53.8 years; 72.5% (480/662) female] with 662 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline(TM) flow diverter were included [69.9% (463/662) derivation group, 30.1% (199/662) validation group]. The incidence of aneurysm occlusion was 82.7%. 4F-FPS demonstrated significant discrimination in 10-fold cross validation [mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area, 0.862 ± 0.055] and calibration (Cox & Snell R(2), 0.251; Nagelkerke R(2), 0.413) in the derivation group. The ROC area of 4F-FPS score in both the derivation and validation groups is the largest compared with previously published grading scales/scores (p < 0.05), which shows better sensitivity and specificity. The 4F-FPS score showed excellent prediction, discrimination, and calibration properties. CONCLUSION: The 4F-FPS score is a simple and reliable tool to predict angiography outcome after flow diversion treatment. If widely adopted, it may provide a common language to be used in future reporting of flow diversion results for clinical trials and daily practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03831672 SAGE Publications 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8381420/ /pubmed/34434256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211039336 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kang, Huibin
Luo, Bin
Liu, Jian
Wang, Anxin
Zhang, Hongqi
Li, Tianxiao
Song, Donglei
Zhao, Yuanli
Guan, Sheng
Wang, Yunyan
Feng, Wenfeng
Wang, Yang
Shi, Huaizhang
Liu, Jianmin
Yang, Xinjian
A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score
title A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score
title_full A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score
title_fullStr A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score
title_full_unstemmed A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score
title_short A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score
title_sort novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4f-flow diversion predictive score
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211039336
work_keys_str_mv AT kanghuibin anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT luobin anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT liujian anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT wanganxin anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT zhanghongqi anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT litianxiao anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT songdonglei anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT zhaoyuanli anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT guansheng anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT wangyunyan anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT fengwenfeng anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT wangyang anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT shihuaizhang anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT liujianmin anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT yangxinjian anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT kanghuibin novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT luobin novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT liujian novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT wanganxin novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT zhanghongqi novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT litianxiao novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT songdonglei novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT zhaoyuanli novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT guansheng novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT wangyunyan novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT fengwenfeng novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT wangyang novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT shihuaizhang novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT liujianmin novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore
AT yangxinjian novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore