Cargando…
A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although grading scales for angiography outcomes following cerebral aneurysm treatment with flow diversion have been published, physicians have not widely adopted these scales in practice. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a novel Flow diversion Predictive Scor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211039336 |
_version_ | 1783741363351715840 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Huibin Luo, Bin Liu, Jian Wang, Anxin Zhang, Hongqi Li, Tianxiao Song, Donglei Zhao, Yuanli Guan, Sheng Wang, Yunyan Feng, Wenfeng Wang, Yang Shi, Huaizhang Liu, Jianmin Yang, Xinjian |
author_facet | Kang, Huibin Luo, Bin Liu, Jian Wang, Anxin Zhang, Hongqi Li, Tianxiao Song, Donglei Zhao, Yuanli Guan, Sheng Wang, Yunyan Feng, Wenfeng Wang, Yang Shi, Huaizhang Liu, Jianmin Yang, Xinjian |
author_sort | Kang, Huibin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although grading scales for angiography outcomes following cerebral aneurysm treatment with flow diversion have been published, physicians have not widely adopted these scales in practice. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a novel Flow diversion Predictive Score (4F-FPS) grading scale based on previously established scales that is simple and reliable. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms with flow diversion between January 2014 and September 2019. The included patients were randomly divided into the derivation and validation group in a 70/30 ratio, respectively. Aneurysms were classified as incomplete or complete occlusion based on final angiography outcomes. 4F-FPS was derived to predict aneurysm occlusion from multivariate logistic regression analyses in the derivation group and validated with previously published grading scales in the validation group. RESULTS: Overall, 662 patients [mean age, 53.8 years; 72.5% (480/662) female] with 662 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline(TM) flow diverter were included [69.9% (463/662) derivation group, 30.1% (199/662) validation group]. The incidence of aneurysm occlusion was 82.7%. 4F-FPS demonstrated significant discrimination in 10-fold cross validation [mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area, 0.862 ± 0.055] and calibration (Cox & Snell R(2), 0.251; Nagelkerke R(2), 0.413) in the derivation group. The ROC area of 4F-FPS score in both the derivation and validation groups is the largest compared with previously published grading scales/scores (p < 0.05), which shows better sensitivity and specificity. The 4F-FPS score showed excellent prediction, discrimination, and calibration properties. CONCLUSION: The 4F-FPS score is a simple and reliable tool to predict angiography outcome after flow diversion treatment. If widely adopted, it may provide a common language to be used in future reporting of flow diversion results for clinical trials and daily practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03831672 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8381420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83814202021-08-24 A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score Kang, Huibin Luo, Bin Liu, Jian Wang, Anxin Zhang, Hongqi Li, Tianxiao Song, Donglei Zhao, Yuanli Guan, Sheng Wang, Yunyan Feng, Wenfeng Wang, Yang Shi, Huaizhang Liu, Jianmin Yang, Xinjian Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although grading scales for angiography outcomes following cerebral aneurysm treatment with flow diversion have been published, physicians have not widely adopted these scales in practice. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a novel Flow diversion Predictive Score (4F-FPS) grading scale based on previously established scales that is simple and reliable. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms with flow diversion between January 2014 and September 2019. The included patients were randomly divided into the derivation and validation group in a 70/30 ratio, respectively. Aneurysms were classified as incomplete or complete occlusion based on final angiography outcomes. 4F-FPS was derived to predict aneurysm occlusion from multivariate logistic regression analyses in the derivation group and validated with previously published grading scales in the validation group. RESULTS: Overall, 662 patients [mean age, 53.8 years; 72.5% (480/662) female] with 662 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline(TM) flow diverter were included [69.9% (463/662) derivation group, 30.1% (199/662) validation group]. The incidence of aneurysm occlusion was 82.7%. 4F-FPS demonstrated significant discrimination in 10-fold cross validation [mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area, 0.862 ± 0.055] and calibration (Cox & Snell R(2), 0.251; Nagelkerke R(2), 0.413) in the derivation group. The ROC area of 4F-FPS score in both the derivation and validation groups is the largest compared with previously published grading scales/scores (p < 0.05), which shows better sensitivity and specificity. The 4F-FPS score showed excellent prediction, discrimination, and calibration properties. CONCLUSION: The 4F-FPS score is a simple and reliable tool to predict angiography outcome after flow diversion treatment. If widely adopted, it may provide a common language to be used in future reporting of flow diversion results for clinical trials and daily practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03831672 SAGE Publications 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8381420/ /pubmed/34434256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211039336 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kang, Huibin Luo, Bin Liu, Jian Wang, Anxin Zhang, Hongqi Li, Tianxiao Song, Donglei Zhao, Yuanli Guan, Sheng Wang, Yunyan Feng, Wenfeng Wang, Yang Shi, Huaizhang Liu, Jianmin Yang, Xinjian A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score |
title | A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow
diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score |
title_full | A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow
diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score |
title_fullStr | A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow
diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow
diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score |
title_short | A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow
diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score |
title_sort | novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow
diversion: 4f-flow diversion predictive score |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211039336 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanghuibin anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT luobin anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT liujian anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT wanganxin anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT zhanghongqi anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT litianxiao anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT songdonglei anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT zhaoyuanli anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT guansheng anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT wangyunyan anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT fengwenfeng anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT wangyang anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT shihuaizhang anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT liujianmin anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT yangxinjian anovelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT kanghuibin novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT luobin novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT liujian novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT wanganxin novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT zhanghongqi novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT litianxiao novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT songdonglei novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT zhaoyuanli novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT guansheng novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT wangyunyan novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT fengwenfeng novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT wangyang novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT shihuaizhang novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT liujianmin novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore AT yangxinjian novelscoreforevaluatingcerebralaneurysmstreatedwithflowdiversion4fflowdiversionpredictivescore |