Cargando…

Clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing neuritis in leprosy patients with neuropathic pain or chronic neuropathy remains challenging since no specific laboratory or neurophysiological marker is available. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study developed at a leprosy outpatient clinic in Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 54 i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giesel, Louise Mara, Hökerberg, Yara Hahr Marques, Pitta, Izabela Jardim Rodrigues, Andrade, Lígia Rocha, Moraes, Debora Bartzen, da Costa Nery, José Augusto, Sarno, Euzenir Nunes, Jardim, Marcia Rodrigues
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34425777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06545-2
_version_ 1783741396591575040
author Giesel, Louise Mara
Hökerberg, Yara Hahr Marques
Pitta, Izabela Jardim Rodrigues
Andrade, Lígia Rocha
Moraes, Debora Bartzen
da Costa Nery, José Augusto
Sarno, Euzenir Nunes
Jardim, Marcia Rodrigues
author_facet Giesel, Louise Mara
Hökerberg, Yara Hahr Marques
Pitta, Izabela Jardim Rodrigues
Andrade, Lígia Rocha
Moraes, Debora Bartzen
da Costa Nery, José Augusto
Sarno, Euzenir Nunes
Jardim, Marcia Rodrigues
author_sort Giesel, Louise Mara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosing neuritis in leprosy patients with neuropathic pain or chronic neuropathy remains challenging since no specific laboratory or neurophysiological marker is available. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study developed at a leprosy outpatient clinic in Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 54 individuals complaining of neural pain (single or multiple sites) were classified into two groups (“neuropathic pain” or “neuritis”) by a neurological specialist in leprosy based on anamnesis together with clinical and electrophysiological examinations. A neurologist, blind to the pain diagnoses, interviewed and examined the participants using a standardized form that included clinical predictors, pain features, and neurological symptoms. The association between the clinical predictors and pain classifications was evaluated via the Pearson Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Six clinical algorithms were generated to evaluate sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals, for clinical predictors statistically associated with neuritis. The most conclusive clinical algorithm was: pain onset at any time during the previous 90 days, or in association with the initiation of neurological symptoms during the prior 30-day period, necessarily associated with the worsening of pain upon movement and nerve palpation, with 94% of specificity and 35% of sensitivity. CONCLUSION: This algorithm could help physicians confirm neuritis in leprosy patients with neural pain, particularly in primary health care units with no access to neurologists or electrophysiological tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8381570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83815702021-08-23 Clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy Giesel, Louise Mara Hökerberg, Yara Hahr Marques Pitta, Izabela Jardim Rodrigues Andrade, Lígia Rocha Moraes, Debora Bartzen da Costa Nery, José Augusto Sarno, Euzenir Nunes Jardim, Marcia Rodrigues BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosing neuritis in leprosy patients with neuropathic pain or chronic neuropathy remains challenging since no specific laboratory or neurophysiological marker is available. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study developed at a leprosy outpatient clinic in Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 54 individuals complaining of neural pain (single or multiple sites) were classified into two groups (“neuropathic pain” or “neuritis”) by a neurological specialist in leprosy based on anamnesis together with clinical and electrophysiological examinations. A neurologist, blind to the pain diagnoses, interviewed and examined the participants using a standardized form that included clinical predictors, pain features, and neurological symptoms. The association between the clinical predictors and pain classifications was evaluated via the Pearson Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Six clinical algorithms were generated to evaluate sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals, for clinical predictors statistically associated with neuritis. The most conclusive clinical algorithm was: pain onset at any time during the previous 90 days, or in association with the initiation of neurological symptoms during the prior 30-day period, necessarily associated with the worsening of pain upon movement and nerve palpation, with 94% of specificity and 35% of sensitivity. CONCLUSION: This algorithm could help physicians confirm neuritis in leprosy patients with neural pain, particularly in primary health care units with no access to neurologists or electrophysiological tests. BioMed Central 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8381570/ /pubmed/34425777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06545-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Giesel, Louise Mara
Hökerberg, Yara Hahr Marques
Pitta, Izabela Jardim Rodrigues
Andrade, Lígia Rocha
Moraes, Debora Bartzen
da Costa Nery, José Augusto
Sarno, Euzenir Nunes
Jardim, Marcia Rodrigues
Clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy
title Clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy
title_full Clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy
title_fullStr Clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy
title_short Clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy
title_sort clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of neuritis in leprosy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34425777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06545-2
work_keys_str_mv AT giesellouisemara clinicalpredictionrulesforthediagnosisofneuritisinleprosy
AT hokerbergyarahahrmarques clinicalpredictionrulesforthediagnosisofneuritisinleprosy
AT pittaizabelajardimrodrigues clinicalpredictionrulesforthediagnosisofneuritisinleprosy
AT andradeligiarocha clinicalpredictionrulesforthediagnosisofneuritisinleprosy
AT moraesdeborabartzen clinicalpredictionrulesforthediagnosisofneuritisinleprosy
AT dacostaneryjoseaugusto clinicalpredictionrulesforthediagnosisofneuritisinleprosy
AT sarnoeuzenirnunes clinicalpredictionrulesforthediagnosisofneuritisinleprosy
AT jardimmarciarodrigues clinicalpredictionrulesforthediagnosisofneuritisinleprosy