Cargando…

Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol

Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake‐promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krief, Stéphane, Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle, Nagmar, Isabelle, Giret, Martin, Belliard, Simon, Perrin, David, Uguen, Marilyne, Robert, Philippe, Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie, Schwartz, Jean‐Charles, Finance, Olivier, Ligneau, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.855
_version_ 1783741419759861760
author Krief, Stéphane
Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle
Nagmar, Isabelle
Giret, Martin
Belliard, Simon
Perrin, David
Uguen, Marilyne
Robert, Philippe
Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie
Schwartz, Jean‐Charles
Finance, Olivier
Ligneau, Xavier
author_facet Krief, Stéphane
Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle
Nagmar, Isabelle
Giret, Martin
Belliard, Simon
Perrin, David
Uguen, Marilyne
Robert, Philippe
Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie
Schwartz, Jean‐Charles
Finance, Olivier
Ligneau, Xavier
author_sort Krief, Stéphane
collection PubMed
description Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake‐promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal of this study was to compare amphetamine, modafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant at their known primary pharmacological targets, histamine H3 receptors (H3R), dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters, and in various in vivo preclinical models in relation to neurochemistry, locomotion, behavioral sensitization, and food intake. Results confirmed that the primary pharmacological effect of amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol was to increase central dopamine neurotransmission, in part by inhibiting its transporter. Furthermore, solriamfetol increased levels of extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, and decreased the 3,4‐dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC)/DA ratio in the striatum, as reported for modafinil and amphetamine. All these compounds produced hyperlocomotion, behavioral sensitization, and hypophagia, which are common features of psychostimulants and of compounds with abuse potential. In contrast, pitolisant, a selective and potent H3R antagonist/inverse agonist that promotes wakefulness, had no effect on striatal dopamine, locomotion, or food intake. In addition, pitolisant, devoid of behavioral sensitization by itself, attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by either modafinil or solriamfetol. Therefore, pitolisant presents biochemical, neurochemical, and behavioral profiles different from those of amphetamine and other psychostimulants such as modafinil or solriamfetol. In conclusion, pitolisant is a differentiated therapeutic option, when compared with psychostimulants, for the treatment of EDS, as this agent does not show any amphetamine‐like properties within in vivo preclinical models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8381683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83816832021-08-30 Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol Krief, Stéphane Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle Nagmar, Isabelle Giret, Martin Belliard, Simon Perrin, David Uguen, Marilyne Robert, Philippe Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie Schwartz, Jean‐Charles Finance, Olivier Ligneau, Xavier Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake‐promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal of this study was to compare amphetamine, modafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant at their known primary pharmacological targets, histamine H3 receptors (H3R), dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters, and in various in vivo preclinical models in relation to neurochemistry, locomotion, behavioral sensitization, and food intake. Results confirmed that the primary pharmacological effect of amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol was to increase central dopamine neurotransmission, in part by inhibiting its transporter. Furthermore, solriamfetol increased levels of extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, and decreased the 3,4‐dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC)/DA ratio in the striatum, as reported for modafinil and amphetamine. All these compounds produced hyperlocomotion, behavioral sensitization, and hypophagia, which are common features of psychostimulants and of compounds with abuse potential. In contrast, pitolisant, a selective and potent H3R antagonist/inverse agonist that promotes wakefulness, had no effect on striatal dopamine, locomotion, or food intake. In addition, pitolisant, devoid of behavioral sensitization by itself, attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by either modafinil or solriamfetol. Therefore, pitolisant presents biochemical, neurochemical, and behavioral profiles different from those of amphetamine and other psychostimulants such as modafinil or solriamfetol. In conclusion, pitolisant is a differentiated therapeutic option, when compared with psychostimulants, for the treatment of EDS, as this agent does not show any amphetamine‐like properties within in vivo preclinical models. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8381683/ /pubmed/34423920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.855 Text en © 2021 Bioprojet Biotech. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Krief, Stéphane
Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle
Nagmar, Isabelle
Giret, Martin
Belliard, Simon
Perrin, David
Uguen, Marilyne
Robert, Philippe
Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie
Schwartz, Jean‐Charles
Finance, Olivier
Ligneau, Xavier
Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol
title Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol
title_full Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol
title_fullStr Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol
title_full_unstemmed Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol
title_short Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol
title_sort pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.855
work_keys_str_mv AT kriefstephane pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT berrebibertrandisabelle pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT nagmarisabelle pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT giretmartin pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT belliardsimon pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT perrindavid pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT uguenmarilyne pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT robertphilippe pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT lecomtejeannemarie pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT schwartzjeancharles pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT financeolivier pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol
AT ligneauxavier pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol