Cargando…
Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol
Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake‐promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.855 |
_version_ | 1783741419759861760 |
---|---|
author | Krief, Stéphane Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle Nagmar, Isabelle Giret, Martin Belliard, Simon Perrin, David Uguen, Marilyne Robert, Philippe Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie Schwartz, Jean‐Charles Finance, Olivier Ligneau, Xavier |
author_facet | Krief, Stéphane Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle Nagmar, Isabelle Giret, Martin Belliard, Simon Perrin, David Uguen, Marilyne Robert, Philippe Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie Schwartz, Jean‐Charles Finance, Olivier Ligneau, Xavier |
author_sort | Krief, Stéphane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake‐promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal of this study was to compare amphetamine, modafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant at their known primary pharmacological targets, histamine H3 receptors (H3R), dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters, and in various in vivo preclinical models in relation to neurochemistry, locomotion, behavioral sensitization, and food intake. Results confirmed that the primary pharmacological effect of amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol was to increase central dopamine neurotransmission, in part by inhibiting its transporter. Furthermore, solriamfetol increased levels of extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, and decreased the 3,4‐dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC)/DA ratio in the striatum, as reported for modafinil and amphetamine. All these compounds produced hyperlocomotion, behavioral sensitization, and hypophagia, which are common features of psychostimulants and of compounds with abuse potential. In contrast, pitolisant, a selective and potent H3R antagonist/inverse agonist that promotes wakefulness, had no effect on striatal dopamine, locomotion, or food intake. In addition, pitolisant, devoid of behavioral sensitization by itself, attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by either modafinil or solriamfetol. Therefore, pitolisant presents biochemical, neurochemical, and behavioral profiles different from those of amphetamine and other psychostimulants such as modafinil or solriamfetol. In conclusion, pitolisant is a differentiated therapeutic option, when compared with psychostimulants, for the treatment of EDS, as this agent does not show any amphetamine‐like properties within in vivo preclinical models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8381683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83816832021-08-30 Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol Krief, Stéphane Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle Nagmar, Isabelle Giret, Martin Belliard, Simon Perrin, David Uguen, Marilyne Robert, Philippe Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie Schwartz, Jean‐Charles Finance, Olivier Ligneau, Xavier Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake‐promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal of this study was to compare amphetamine, modafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant at their known primary pharmacological targets, histamine H3 receptors (H3R), dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters, and in various in vivo preclinical models in relation to neurochemistry, locomotion, behavioral sensitization, and food intake. Results confirmed that the primary pharmacological effect of amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol was to increase central dopamine neurotransmission, in part by inhibiting its transporter. Furthermore, solriamfetol increased levels of extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, and decreased the 3,4‐dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC)/DA ratio in the striatum, as reported for modafinil and amphetamine. All these compounds produced hyperlocomotion, behavioral sensitization, and hypophagia, which are common features of psychostimulants and of compounds with abuse potential. In contrast, pitolisant, a selective and potent H3R antagonist/inverse agonist that promotes wakefulness, had no effect on striatal dopamine, locomotion, or food intake. In addition, pitolisant, devoid of behavioral sensitization by itself, attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by either modafinil or solriamfetol. Therefore, pitolisant presents biochemical, neurochemical, and behavioral profiles different from those of amphetamine and other psychostimulants such as modafinil or solriamfetol. In conclusion, pitolisant is a differentiated therapeutic option, when compared with psychostimulants, for the treatment of EDS, as this agent does not show any amphetamine‐like properties within in vivo preclinical models. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8381683/ /pubmed/34423920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.855 Text en © 2021 Bioprojet Biotech. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Krief, Stéphane Berrebi‐Bertrand, Isabelle Nagmar, Isabelle Giret, Martin Belliard, Simon Perrin, David Uguen, Marilyne Robert, Philippe Lecomte, Jeanne‐Marie Schwartz, Jean‐Charles Finance, Olivier Ligneau, Xavier Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol |
title | Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol |
title_full | Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol |
title_fullStr | Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol |
title_full_unstemmed | Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol |
title_short | Pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol |
title_sort | pitolisant, a wake‐promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kriefstephane pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT berrebibertrandisabelle pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT nagmarisabelle pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT giretmartin pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT belliardsimon pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT perrindavid pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT uguenmarilyne pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT robertphilippe pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT lecomtejeannemarie pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT schwartzjeancharles pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT financeolivier pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol AT ligneauxavier pitolisantawakepromotingagentdevoidofpsychostimulantpropertiespreclinicalcomparisonwithamphetaminemodafinilandsolriamfetol |