Cargando…
Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification
BACKGROUND: The comparison between profiles during the commissioning of the treatment planning system is an essential procedure. It is impossible to designate a field size for off-axis, wedged, and FFF beams directly by using the definition of the on-axis symmetric field size. This work proposes the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Via Medica
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434571 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0049 |
_version_ | 1783741481426616320 |
---|---|
author | Wendykier, Jacek Grządziel, Aleksandra Bekman, Barbara Bieniasiewicz, Marcin Bekman, Adam Wendykier, Piotr Woźniak, Bożena Reudelsdorf, Marta Ślosarek, Krzysztof |
author_facet | Wendykier, Jacek Grządziel, Aleksandra Bekman, Barbara Bieniasiewicz, Marcin Bekman, Adam Wendykier, Piotr Woźniak, Bożena Reudelsdorf, Marta Ślosarek, Krzysztof |
author_sort | Wendykier, Jacek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The comparison between profiles during the commissioning of the treatment planning system is an essential procedure. It is impossible to designate a field size for off-axis, wedged, and FFF beams directly by using the definition of the on-axis symmetric field size. This work proposes the use of different characteristic points as indicators of the field size for commissioning and QA purposes. This work aimed to search for the beam profile’s characteristic points and use them for the TPS commissioning purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposal is to use profile inflection points as the beam profile characteristic points. The usage of dedicated software allowed for comparing distances between inflection points and between points of 50% intensity. For the off-axis, wedged, and FFF fields, comparisons were made to the nominal field sizes. RESULTS: Distances between inflection points proved to be different by less than 1 mm from nominal field sizes for all kinds of investigated beams. CONCLUSIONS: Inflection points are convenient for comparing the off-axis, wedged, and FFF field sizes because of their independence from profile normalization. With finite accuracy, the inflection points could be used for the above kind of beam sizes designation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8382072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Via Medica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83820722021-08-24 Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification Wendykier, Jacek Grządziel, Aleksandra Bekman, Barbara Bieniasiewicz, Marcin Bekman, Adam Wendykier, Piotr Woźniak, Bożena Reudelsdorf, Marta Ślosarek, Krzysztof Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: The comparison between profiles during the commissioning of the treatment planning system is an essential procedure. It is impossible to designate a field size for off-axis, wedged, and FFF beams directly by using the definition of the on-axis symmetric field size. This work proposes the use of different characteristic points as indicators of the field size for commissioning and QA purposes. This work aimed to search for the beam profile’s characteristic points and use them for the TPS commissioning purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposal is to use profile inflection points as the beam profile characteristic points. The usage of dedicated software allowed for comparing distances between inflection points and between points of 50% intensity. For the off-axis, wedged, and FFF fields, comparisons were made to the nominal field sizes. RESULTS: Distances between inflection points proved to be different by less than 1 mm from nominal field sizes for all kinds of investigated beams. CONCLUSIONS: Inflection points are convenient for comparing the off-axis, wedged, and FFF field sizes because of their independence from profile normalization. With finite accuracy, the inflection points could be used for the above kind of beam sizes designation. Via Medica 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8382072/ /pubmed/34434571 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0049 Text en © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Wendykier, Jacek Grządziel, Aleksandra Bekman, Barbara Bieniasiewicz, Marcin Bekman, Adam Wendykier, Piotr Woźniak, Bożena Reudelsdorf, Marta Ślosarek, Krzysztof Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification |
title | Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification |
title_full | Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification |
title_fullStr | Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification |
title_full_unstemmed | Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification |
title_short | Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification |
title_sort | using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434571 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wendykierjacek usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification AT grzadzielaleksandra usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification AT bekmanbarbara usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification AT bieniasiewiczmarcin usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification AT bekmanadam usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification AT wendykierpiotr usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification AT wozniakbozena usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification AT reudelsdorfmarta usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification AT slosarekkrzysztof usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification |