Cargando…

Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification

BACKGROUND: The comparison between profiles during the commissioning of the treatment planning system is an essential procedure. It is impossible to designate a field size for off-axis, wedged, and FFF beams directly by using the definition of the on-axis symmetric field size. This work proposes the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendykier, Jacek, Grządziel, Aleksandra, Bekman, Barbara, Bieniasiewicz, Marcin, Bekman, Adam, Wendykier, Piotr, Woźniak, Bożena, Reudelsdorf, Marta, Ślosarek, Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434571
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0049
_version_ 1783741481426616320
author Wendykier, Jacek
Grządziel, Aleksandra
Bekman, Barbara
Bieniasiewicz, Marcin
Bekman, Adam
Wendykier, Piotr
Woźniak, Bożena
Reudelsdorf, Marta
Ślosarek, Krzysztof
author_facet Wendykier, Jacek
Grządziel, Aleksandra
Bekman, Barbara
Bieniasiewicz, Marcin
Bekman, Adam
Wendykier, Piotr
Woźniak, Bożena
Reudelsdorf, Marta
Ślosarek, Krzysztof
author_sort Wendykier, Jacek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The comparison between profiles during the commissioning of the treatment planning system is an essential procedure. It is impossible to designate a field size for off-axis, wedged, and FFF beams directly by using the definition of the on-axis symmetric field size. This work proposes the use of different characteristic points as indicators of the field size for commissioning and QA purposes. This work aimed to search for the beam profile’s characteristic points and use them for the TPS commissioning purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposal is to use profile inflection points as the beam profile characteristic points. The usage of dedicated software allowed for comparing distances between inflection points and between points of 50% intensity. For the off-axis, wedged, and FFF fields, comparisons were made to the nominal field sizes. RESULTS: Distances between inflection points proved to be different by less than 1 mm from nominal field sizes for all kinds of investigated beams. CONCLUSIONS: Inflection points are convenient for comparing the off-axis, wedged, and FFF field sizes because of their independence from profile normalization. With finite accuracy, the inflection points could be used for the above kind of beam sizes designation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83820722021-08-24 Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification Wendykier, Jacek Grządziel, Aleksandra Bekman, Barbara Bieniasiewicz, Marcin Bekman, Adam Wendykier, Piotr Woźniak, Bożena Reudelsdorf, Marta Ślosarek, Krzysztof Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: The comparison between profiles during the commissioning of the treatment planning system is an essential procedure. It is impossible to designate a field size for off-axis, wedged, and FFF beams directly by using the definition of the on-axis symmetric field size. This work proposes the use of different characteristic points as indicators of the field size for commissioning and QA purposes. This work aimed to search for the beam profile’s characteristic points and use them for the TPS commissioning purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposal is to use profile inflection points as the beam profile characteristic points. The usage of dedicated software allowed for comparing distances between inflection points and between points of 50% intensity. For the off-axis, wedged, and FFF fields, comparisons were made to the nominal field sizes. RESULTS: Distances between inflection points proved to be different by less than 1 mm from nominal field sizes for all kinds of investigated beams. CONCLUSIONS: Inflection points are convenient for comparing the off-axis, wedged, and FFF field sizes because of their independence from profile normalization. With finite accuracy, the inflection points could be used for the above kind of beam sizes designation. Via Medica 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8382072/ /pubmed/34434571 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0049 Text en © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Wendykier, Jacek
Grządziel, Aleksandra
Bekman, Barbara
Bieniasiewicz, Marcin
Bekman, Adam
Wendykier, Piotr
Woźniak, Bożena
Reudelsdorf, Marta
Ślosarek, Krzysztof
Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification
title Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification
title_full Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification
title_fullStr Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification
title_full_unstemmed Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification
title_short Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification
title_sort using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434571
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0049
work_keys_str_mv AT wendykierjacek usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification
AT grzadzielaleksandra usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification
AT bekmanbarbara usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification
AT bieniasiewiczmarcin usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification
AT bekmanadam usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification
AT wendykierpiotr usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification
AT wozniakbozena usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification
AT reudelsdorfmarta usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification
AT slosarekkrzysztof usingbeamprofileinflectionpointinprocessoftreatmentplanningsystemverification