Cargando…
Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®)
BACKGROUND: Setup accuracy within adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer treated in free breathing is well studied, but a comparison of the typical regions of interest (ROI) used in surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) does not exist. The aim of this study was to estimate the setup accuracy obtai...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Via Medica
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434570 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0062 |
_version_ | 1783741483279450112 |
---|---|
author | Laaksomaa, Marko Moser, Torsten Kritz, Julia Pynnönen, Kiira Rossi, Maija |
author_facet | Laaksomaa, Marko Moser, Torsten Kritz, Julia Pynnönen, Kiira Rossi, Maija |
author_sort | Laaksomaa, Marko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Setup accuracy within adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer treated in free breathing is well studied, but a comparison of the typical regions of interest (ROI) used in surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) does not exist. The aim of this study was to estimate the setup accuracy obtained with differently shaped ROIs in SGRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 573 orthogonal image pairs were analyzed from free breathing breast patients in two groups: positioning using AlignRT(®) surface guidance system (Group A, n = 20), and setup using conventional laser and tattoo setup (Group L, n = 20). For SGRT, three different setup ROIs were used: a Breast-shaped, O-shaped and T-shaped (B-O and T-ROI). We evaluated the isocenter-, rotation-, pitch and arm position accuracy and residual errors for the chest wall and shoulder joint in kV orthogonal and tangential setup images with laser- or SGRT-based setup. RESULTS: Less isocenter variance was found in Group A than in Group L. Rotations and posture errors were larger in group L than in Group A (p ≤ 0.05). Rotation error was smaller with T-shaped ROI than with O- or B-shape (p = 0.01–0.04). CONCLUSION: Setup with AlignRT(®) improves reproducibility compared to laser setup. Between the different ROI shapes only small differences were found in the patient posture or the isocenter position in the images. The T-ROI is recommended to set up the chest wall bony structure and an additional B-ROI may be used to fine-tune the soft tissue accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8382080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Via Medica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83820802021-08-24 Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®) Laaksomaa, Marko Moser, Torsten Kritz, Julia Pynnönen, Kiira Rossi, Maija Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: Setup accuracy within adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer treated in free breathing is well studied, but a comparison of the typical regions of interest (ROI) used in surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) does not exist. The aim of this study was to estimate the setup accuracy obtained with differently shaped ROIs in SGRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 573 orthogonal image pairs were analyzed from free breathing breast patients in two groups: positioning using AlignRT(®) surface guidance system (Group A, n = 20), and setup using conventional laser and tattoo setup (Group L, n = 20). For SGRT, three different setup ROIs were used: a Breast-shaped, O-shaped and T-shaped (B-O and T-ROI). We evaluated the isocenter-, rotation-, pitch and arm position accuracy and residual errors for the chest wall and shoulder joint in kV orthogonal and tangential setup images with laser- or SGRT-based setup. RESULTS: Less isocenter variance was found in Group A than in Group L. Rotations and posture errors were larger in group L than in Group A (p ≤ 0.05). Rotation error was smaller with T-shaped ROI than with O- or B-shape (p = 0.01–0.04). CONCLUSION: Setup with AlignRT(®) improves reproducibility compared to laser setup. Between the different ROI shapes only small differences were found in the patient posture or the isocenter position in the images. The T-ROI is recommended to set up the chest wall bony structure and an additional B-ROI may be used to fine-tune the soft tissue accuracy. Via Medica 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8382080/ /pubmed/34434570 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0062 Text en © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Laaksomaa, Marko Moser, Torsten Kritz, Julia Pynnönen, Kiira Rossi, Maija Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®) |
title | Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®) |
title_full | Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®) |
title_short | Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®) |
title_sort | comparison of three differently shaped rois in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with alignrt(®) |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434570 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laaksomaamarko comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt AT mosertorsten comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt AT kritzjulia comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt AT pynnonenkiira comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt AT rossimaija comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt |