Cargando…

Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®)

BACKGROUND: Setup accuracy within adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer treated in free breathing is well studied, but a comparison of the typical regions of interest (ROI) used in surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) does not exist. The aim of this study was to estimate the setup accuracy obtai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laaksomaa, Marko, Moser, Torsten, Kritz, Julia, Pynnönen, Kiira, Rossi, Maija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434570
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0062
_version_ 1783741483279450112
author Laaksomaa, Marko
Moser, Torsten
Kritz, Julia
Pynnönen, Kiira
Rossi, Maija
author_facet Laaksomaa, Marko
Moser, Torsten
Kritz, Julia
Pynnönen, Kiira
Rossi, Maija
author_sort Laaksomaa, Marko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Setup accuracy within adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer treated in free breathing is well studied, but a comparison of the typical regions of interest (ROI) used in surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) does not exist. The aim of this study was to estimate the setup accuracy obtained with differently shaped ROIs in SGRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 573 orthogonal image pairs were analyzed from free breathing breast patients in two groups: positioning using AlignRT(®) surface guidance system (Group A, n = 20), and setup using conventional laser and tattoo setup (Group L, n = 20). For SGRT, three different setup ROIs were used: a Breast-shaped, O-shaped and T-shaped (B-O and T-ROI). We evaluated the isocenter-, rotation-, pitch and arm position accuracy and residual errors for the chest wall and shoulder joint in kV orthogonal and tangential setup images with laser- or SGRT-based setup. RESULTS: Less isocenter variance was found in Group A than in Group L. Rotations and posture errors were larger in group L than in Group A (p ≤ 0.05). Rotation error was smaller with T-shaped ROI than with O- or B-shape (p = 0.01–0.04). CONCLUSION: Setup with AlignRT(®) improves reproducibility compared to laser setup. Between the different ROI shapes only small differences were found in the patient posture or the isocenter position in the images. The T-ROI is recommended to set up the chest wall bony structure and an additional B-ROI may be used to fine-tune the soft tissue accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83820802021-08-24 Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®) Laaksomaa, Marko Moser, Torsten Kritz, Julia Pynnönen, Kiira Rossi, Maija Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: Setup accuracy within adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer treated in free breathing is well studied, but a comparison of the typical regions of interest (ROI) used in surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) does not exist. The aim of this study was to estimate the setup accuracy obtained with differently shaped ROIs in SGRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 573 orthogonal image pairs were analyzed from free breathing breast patients in two groups: positioning using AlignRT(®) surface guidance system (Group A, n = 20), and setup using conventional laser and tattoo setup (Group L, n = 20). For SGRT, three different setup ROIs were used: a Breast-shaped, O-shaped and T-shaped (B-O and T-ROI). We evaluated the isocenter-, rotation-, pitch and arm position accuracy and residual errors for the chest wall and shoulder joint in kV orthogonal and tangential setup images with laser- or SGRT-based setup. RESULTS: Less isocenter variance was found in Group A than in Group L. Rotations and posture errors were larger in group L than in Group A (p ≤ 0.05). Rotation error was smaller with T-shaped ROI than with O- or B-shape (p = 0.01–0.04). CONCLUSION: Setup with AlignRT(®) improves reproducibility compared to laser setup. Between the different ROI shapes only small differences were found in the patient posture or the isocenter position in the images. The T-ROI is recommended to set up the chest wall bony structure and an additional B-ROI may be used to fine-tune the soft tissue accuracy. Via Medica 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8382080/ /pubmed/34434570 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0062 Text en © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Laaksomaa, Marko
Moser, Torsten
Kritz, Julia
Pynnönen, Kiira
Rossi, Maija
Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®)
title Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®)
title_full Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®)
title_fullStr Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®)
title_short Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT(®)
title_sort comparison of three differently shaped rois in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with alignrt(®)
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434570
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0062
work_keys_str_mv AT laaksomaamarko comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt
AT mosertorsten comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt
AT kritzjulia comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt
AT pynnonenkiira comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt
AT rossimaija comparisonofthreedifferentlyshapedroisinfreebreathingbreastradiotherapysetupusingsurfaceguidancewithalignrt