Cargando…

Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies

BACKGROUND: Salvage radiotherapy (sRT) is the main potentially curative treatment after biochemical failure/locoregional relapse post-radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of the study was to characterize the population who underwent sRT after RP at our Department, to understand the influence of sever...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigues, Isabel, Ferreira, Carolina, Gonçalves, Joana, Carvalho, Luísa, Oliveira, Jorge, Castro, Carla, Oliveira, Ângelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434569
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0070
_version_ 1783741483505942528
author Rodrigues, Isabel
Ferreira, Carolina
Gonçalves, Joana
Carvalho, Luísa
Oliveira, Jorge
Castro, Carla
Oliveira, Ângelo
author_facet Rodrigues, Isabel
Ferreira, Carolina
Gonçalves, Joana
Carvalho, Luísa
Oliveira, Jorge
Castro, Carla
Oliveira, Ângelo
author_sort Rodrigues, Isabel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Salvage radiotherapy (sRT) is the main potentially curative treatment after biochemical failure/locoregional relapse post-radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of the study was to characterize the population who underwent sRT after RP at our Department, to understand the influence of several potential prognosis factors, and to determine possible optimization strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing sRT at our department between 2012 and 2017, evaluating patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, restaging procedures and clinical outcomes — namely biochemical relapse-free survival (BC-RFS), clinical relapse-free survival (C-RFS), additional hormone therapy-free survival (HT-FS) and overall survival (OS). We assessed potential prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate models (MVA). RESULTS: We included 277 patients (median age 68 years). Median pre-sRT PSA was > 0.5ng/mL in 54.9%. All underwent prostate bed irradiation. Pelvic lymph nodes were included in 9.7%. Outcome analysis was performed for 264 patients (35.6 months median follow-up). At 3 years, BC-RFS was 61.4%, C-RFS was 81.3%, HT-FS was 79.9% and OS was 96.6%. Most relapses occurred in regional lymph nodes only (47.9% patients who relapsed). On MVA, lymphovascular invasion, advanced pT-stages and negative margins negatively influenced BC-RFS (p = 0.029, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) and HT-FS (p = 0.001, p = 0.029 and p = 0.002). C-RFS was worsened by lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.009) and negative margins (p = 0.015). These had no effect on OS. BC-RFS and HT-FS were improved when sRT started while PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Lymphovascular invasion, higher pT-stages and negative margins negatively affected prognosis. An early start of sRT (PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL) predicted better BC-RFS and HT-FS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83820812021-08-24 Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies Rodrigues, Isabel Ferreira, Carolina Gonçalves, Joana Carvalho, Luísa Oliveira, Jorge Castro, Carla Oliveira, Ângelo Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: Salvage radiotherapy (sRT) is the main potentially curative treatment after biochemical failure/locoregional relapse post-radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of the study was to characterize the population who underwent sRT after RP at our Department, to understand the influence of several potential prognosis factors, and to determine possible optimization strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing sRT at our department between 2012 and 2017, evaluating patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, restaging procedures and clinical outcomes — namely biochemical relapse-free survival (BC-RFS), clinical relapse-free survival (C-RFS), additional hormone therapy-free survival (HT-FS) and overall survival (OS). We assessed potential prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate models (MVA). RESULTS: We included 277 patients (median age 68 years). Median pre-sRT PSA was > 0.5ng/mL in 54.9%. All underwent prostate bed irradiation. Pelvic lymph nodes were included in 9.7%. Outcome analysis was performed for 264 patients (35.6 months median follow-up). At 3 years, BC-RFS was 61.4%, C-RFS was 81.3%, HT-FS was 79.9% and OS was 96.6%. Most relapses occurred in regional lymph nodes only (47.9% patients who relapsed). On MVA, lymphovascular invasion, advanced pT-stages and negative margins negatively influenced BC-RFS (p = 0.029, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) and HT-FS (p = 0.001, p = 0.029 and p = 0.002). C-RFS was worsened by lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.009) and negative margins (p = 0.015). These had no effect on OS. BC-RFS and HT-FS were improved when sRT started while PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Lymphovascular invasion, higher pT-stages and negative margins negatively affected prognosis. An early start of sRT (PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL) predicted better BC-RFS and HT-FS. Via Medica 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8382081/ /pubmed/34434569 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0070 Text en © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Rodrigues, Isabel
Ferreira, Carolina
Gonçalves, Joana
Carvalho, Luísa
Oliveira, Jorge
Castro, Carla
Oliveira, Ângelo
Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies
title Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies
title_full Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies
title_fullStr Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies
title_full_unstemmed Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies
title_short Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies
title_sort pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer — outcomes and optimization strategies
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434569
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0070
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguesisabel pathologicalstagesurgicalmarginandlymphovascularinvasionasprognosticfactorsaftersalvageradiotherapyforpostprostatectomyrelapsedprostatecanceroutcomesandoptimizationstrategies
AT ferreiracarolina pathologicalstagesurgicalmarginandlymphovascularinvasionasprognosticfactorsaftersalvageradiotherapyforpostprostatectomyrelapsedprostatecanceroutcomesandoptimizationstrategies
AT goncalvesjoana pathologicalstagesurgicalmarginandlymphovascularinvasionasprognosticfactorsaftersalvageradiotherapyforpostprostatectomyrelapsedprostatecanceroutcomesandoptimizationstrategies
AT carvalholuisa pathologicalstagesurgicalmarginandlymphovascularinvasionasprognosticfactorsaftersalvageradiotherapyforpostprostatectomyrelapsedprostatecanceroutcomesandoptimizationstrategies
AT oliveirajorge pathologicalstagesurgicalmarginandlymphovascularinvasionasprognosticfactorsaftersalvageradiotherapyforpostprostatectomyrelapsedprostatecanceroutcomesandoptimizationstrategies
AT castrocarla pathologicalstagesurgicalmarginandlymphovascularinvasionasprognosticfactorsaftersalvageradiotherapyforpostprostatectomyrelapsedprostatecanceroutcomesandoptimizationstrategies
AT oliveiraangelo pathologicalstagesurgicalmarginandlymphovascularinvasionasprognosticfactorsaftersalvageradiotherapyforpostprostatectomyrelapsedprostatecanceroutcomesandoptimizationstrategies