Cargando…

Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) — based total body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND: The dosimetric characterization of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based total-body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients between the ages of 2 and 12 years were enrolled for VMAT-based TBI from 2018 to 2020. Three isocen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaray, Kadir, Damulira, Edrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434567
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0061
_version_ 1783741484191711232
author Yaray, Kadir
Damulira, Edrine
author_facet Yaray, Kadir
Damulira, Edrine
author_sort Yaray, Kadir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The dosimetric characterization of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based total-body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients between the ages of 2 and 12 years were enrolled for VMAT-based TBI from 2018 to 2020. Three isocenters were irradiated over three overlapping arcs. While prescribing 90% of the TBI dose to the planning treatment volume (PTV), two fractions (2 Gy each) were delivered each day; hence 12 Gy was delivered in six fractions. During treatment optimization, the mean lung and kidney doses were set not to exceed 7 Gy and 7.5 Gy, respectively. The maximum lens dose was also set to less than 4 Gy. Patient quality assurance was carried out by comparing treatment planning system doses to the 3-dimensional measured doses by the ArcCHECK(®) detector. The electronic portal imaging device (EPID) gamma indices were also obtained. RESULTS: The average mean lung dose was 7.75 ± 0.18 Gy, mean kidney dose 7.63 ± 0.26 Gy, maximum lens dose 4.41 ± 0.39 Gy, and the mean PTV dose 12.69 ± 0.16 Gy. The average PTV heterogeneity index was 1.15 ± 0.03. Average differences in mean kidney dose, mean lung dose, and mean target dose were 2.79% ± 0.88, 0.84% ± 0.45 and 0.93% ± 0.47, respectively; when comparing planned and ArcCHECK(®) measured doses. Only grade 1–2 radiation toxicities were recorded, based on CTCAE v5.0 scoring criteria. CONCLUSIONS: VMAT-TBI was characterized with good PTV coverage, homogeneous dose distribution, planned and measured dose agreement, and low toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83820842021-08-24 Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) — based total body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients Yaray, Kadir Damulira, Edrine Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: The dosimetric characterization of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based total-body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients between the ages of 2 and 12 years were enrolled for VMAT-based TBI from 2018 to 2020. Three isocenters were irradiated over three overlapping arcs. While prescribing 90% of the TBI dose to the planning treatment volume (PTV), two fractions (2 Gy each) were delivered each day; hence 12 Gy was delivered in six fractions. During treatment optimization, the mean lung and kidney doses were set not to exceed 7 Gy and 7.5 Gy, respectively. The maximum lens dose was also set to less than 4 Gy. Patient quality assurance was carried out by comparing treatment planning system doses to the 3-dimensional measured doses by the ArcCHECK(®) detector. The electronic portal imaging device (EPID) gamma indices were also obtained. RESULTS: The average mean lung dose was 7.75 ± 0.18 Gy, mean kidney dose 7.63 ± 0.26 Gy, maximum lens dose 4.41 ± 0.39 Gy, and the mean PTV dose 12.69 ± 0.16 Gy. The average PTV heterogeneity index was 1.15 ± 0.03. Average differences in mean kidney dose, mean lung dose, and mean target dose were 2.79% ± 0.88, 0.84% ± 0.45 and 0.93% ± 0.47, respectively; when comparing planned and ArcCHECK(®) measured doses. Only grade 1–2 radiation toxicities were recorded, based on CTCAE v5.0 scoring criteria. CONCLUSIONS: VMAT-TBI was characterized with good PTV coverage, homogeneous dose distribution, planned and measured dose agreement, and low toxicity. Via Medica 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8382084/ /pubmed/34434567 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0061 Text en © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Yaray, Kadir
Damulira, Edrine
Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) — based total body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients
title Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) — based total body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients
title_full Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) — based total body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) — based total body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) — based total body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients
title_short Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) — based total body irradiation (TBI) in pediatric patients
title_sort evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (vmat) — based total body irradiation (tbi) in pediatric patients
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434567
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0061
work_keys_str_mv AT yaraykadir evaluationofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatbasedtotalbodyirradiationtbiinpediatricpatients
AT damuliraedrine evaluationofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatbasedtotalbodyirradiationtbiinpediatricpatients