Cargando…
Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight
Animals rely on sensory feedback to generate accurate, reliable movements. In many flying insects, strain-sensitive neurons on the wings provide rapid feedback that is critical for stable flight control. While the impacts of wing structure on aerodynamic performance have been widely studied, the imp...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34379622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009195 |
_version_ | 1783741500909158400 |
---|---|
author | Weber, Alison I. Daniel, Thomas L. Brunton, Bingni W. |
author_facet | Weber, Alison I. Daniel, Thomas L. Brunton, Bingni W. |
author_sort | Weber, Alison I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animals rely on sensory feedback to generate accurate, reliable movements. In many flying insects, strain-sensitive neurons on the wings provide rapid feedback that is critical for stable flight control. While the impacts of wing structure on aerodynamic performance have been widely studied, the impacts of wing structure on sensing are largely unexplored. In this paper, we show how the structural properties of the wing and encoding by mechanosensory neurons interact to jointly determine optimal sensing strategies and performance. Specifically, we examine how neural sensors can be placed effectively on a flapping wing to detect body rotation about different axes, using a computational wing model with varying flexural stiffness. A small set of mechanosensors, conveying strain information at key locations with a single action potential per wingbeat, enable accurate detection of body rotation. Optimal sensor locations are concentrated at either the wing base or the wing tip, and they transition sharply as a function of both wing stiffness and neural threshold. Moreover, the sensing strategy and performance is robust to both external disturbances and sensor loss. Typically, only five sensors are needed to achieve near-peak accuracy, with a single sensor often providing accuracy well above chance. Our results show that small-amplitude, dynamic signals can be extracted efficiently with spatially and temporally sparse sensors in the context of flight. The demonstrated interaction of wing structure and neural encoding properties points to the importance of understanding each in the context of their joint evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8382179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83821792021-08-24 Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight Weber, Alison I. Daniel, Thomas L. Brunton, Bingni W. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Animals rely on sensory feedback to generate accurate, reliable movements. In many flying insects, strain-sensitive neurons on the wings provide rapid feedback that is critical for stable flight control. While the impacts of wing structure on aerodynamic performance have been widely studied, the impacts of wing structure on sensing are largely unexplored. In this paper, we show how the structural properties of the wing and encoding by mechanosensory neurons interact to jointly determine optimal sensing strategies and performance. Specifically, we examine how neural sensors can be placed effectively on a flapping wing to detect body rotation about different axes, using a computational wing model with varying flexural stiffness. A small set of mechanosensors, conveying strain information at key locations with a single action potential per wingbeat, enable accurate detection of body rotation. Optimal sensor locations are concentrated at either the wing base or the wing tip, and they transition sharply as a function of both wing stiffness and neural threshold. Moreover, the sensing strategy and performance is robust to both external disturbances and sensor loss. Typically, only five sensors are needed to achieve near-peak accuracy, with a single sensor often providing accuracy well above chance. Our results show that small-amplitude, dynamic signals can be extracted efficiently with spatially and temporally sparse sensors in the context of flight. The demonstrated interaction of wing structure and neural encoding properties points to the importance of understanding each in the context of their joint evolution. Public Library of Science 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8382179/ /pubmed/34379622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009195 Text en © 2021 Weber et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weber, Alison I. Daniel, Thomas L. Brunton, Bingni W. Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight |
title | Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight |
title_full | Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight |
title_fullStr | Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight |
title_full_unstemmed | Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight |
title_short | Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight |
title_sort | wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34379622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weberalisoni wingstructureandneuralencodingjointlydeterminesensingstrategiesininsectflight AT danielthomasl wingstructureandneuralencodingjointlydeterminesensingstrategiesininsectflight AT bruntonbingniw wingstructureandneuralencodingjointlydeterminesensingstrategiesininsectflight |