Cargando…

Phytase Supplementation Effects on Amino Acid Digestibility in Broiler Chickens are Influenced by Dietary Calcium Concentrations but not by Acid-Binding Capacity

BACKGROUND: Responses to dietary calcium (Ca) and supplemented phytase on prececal amino acid digestibility (pcAAD) in broiler chickens vary among studies. The variation may arise from the dietary acid-binding capacity (ABC) that influences the activity of enzymes in the digestive tract and from mic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siegert, Wolfgang, Krieg, Jochen, Sommerfeld, Vera, Borda-Molina, Daniel, Feuerstein, Dieter, Camarinha-Silva, Amélia, Rodehutscord, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab103
_version_ 1783741517930692608
author Siegert, Wolfgang
Krieg, Jochen
Sommerfeld, Vera
Borda-Molina, Daniel
Feuerstein, Dieter
Camarinha-Silva, Amélia
Rodehutscord, Markus
author_facet Siegert, Wolfgang
Krieg, Jochen
Sommerfeld, Vera
Borda-Molina, Daniel
Feuerstein, Dieter
Camarinha-Silva, Amélia
Rodehutscord, Markus
author_sort Siegert, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Responses to dietary calcium (Ca) and supplemented phytase on prececal amino acid digestibility (pcAAD) in broiler chickens vary among studies. The variation may arise from the dietary acid-binding capacity (ABC) that influences the activity of enzymes in the digestive tract and from microbial activity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the ABC influences phytase effects on pcAAD and whether microbial activity contributes to this. METHODS: Male Ross 308 broiler chickens were provided 1 of 12 diets in 72 pens (15/pen) from day 16 of age until the end of the experiment on days 21 or 22. In a 3 × 2 × 2-factorial arrangement, the ABC was varied by replacing calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) with Ca-formate or by adding formic acid to CaCO(3)-containing diets, and contained 5.6 or 8.2 g Ca/kg and 0 or 1500 phytase units/kg. The ileum content was collected for pcAAD measurement and microbial community composition was used to investigate whether changes in pcAAD are related to the microbiota. RESULTS: Three-factor ANOVA showed that reducing the ABC increased pcAAD (average 1.1 percentage points) and no significant interaction of the ABC with Ca concentration and phytase supplementation including 3-way interactions. Without phytase, increasing dietary Ca concentration decreased pcAAD (average 3.1 percentage points). Phytase supplementation increased pcAAD (average 2.1 and 5.0 percentage points at low and high Ca concentrations, respectively), to reach the same level for both Ca concentrations. Microbial functional predictions pointed towards an influence of the microbiota in the crop and ileum content on amino acid concentrations, as indicated by different relative abundances of predicted genes related to amino acid biosynthesis, degradation, and metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary Ca concentrations but not the ABC modulates the effect of supplemented phytase on pcAAD in broiler chickens. The microbiota might contribute to differences in pcAAD by changing the amino acid composition of the digesta. The extent of this effect is still unknown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83822742021-08-25 Phytase Supplementation Effects on Amino Acid Digestibility in Broiler Chickens are Influenced by Dietary Calcium Concentrations but not by Acid-Binding Capacity Siegert, Wolfgang Krieg, Jochen Sommerfeld, Vera Borda-Molina, Daniel Feuerstein, Dieter Camarinha-Silva, Amélia Rodehutscord, Markus Curr Dev Nutr ORIGINAL RESEARCH BACKGROUND: Responses to dietary calcium (Ca) and supplemented phytase on prececal amino acid digestibility (pcAAD) in broiler chickens vary among studies. The variation may arise from the dietary acid-binding capacity (ABC) that influences the activity of enzymes in the digestive tract and from microbial activity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the ABC influences phytase effects on pcAAD and whether microbial activity contributes to this. METHODS: Male Ross 308 broiler chickens were provided 1 of 12 diets in 72 pens (15/pen) from day 16 of age until the end of the experiment on days 21 or 22. In a 3 × 2 × 2-factorial arrangement, the ABC was varied by replacing calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) with Ca-formate or by adding formic acid to CaCO(3)-containing diets, and contained 5.6 or 8.2 g Ca/kg and 0 or 1500 phytase units/kg. The ileum content was collected for pcAAD measurement and microbial community composition was used to investigate whether changes in pcAAD are related to the microbiota. RESULTS: Three-factor ANOVA showed that reducing the ABC increased pcAAD (average 1.1 percentage points) and no significant interaction of the ABC with Ca concentration and phytase supplementation including 3-way interactions. Without phytase, increasing dietary Ca concentration decreased pcAAD (average 3.1 percentage points). Phytase supplementation increased pcAAD (average 2.1 and 5.0 percentage points at low and high Ca concentrations, respectively), to reach the same level for both Ca concentrations. Microbial functional predictions pointed towards an influence of the microbiota in the crop and ileum content on amino acid concentrations, as indicated by different relative abundances of predicted genes related to amino acid biosynthesis, degradation, and metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary Ca concentrations but not the ABC modulates the effect of supplemented phytase on pcAAD in broiler chickens. The microbiota might contribute to differences in pcAAD by changing the amino acid composition of the digesta. The extent of this effect is still unknown. Oxford University Press 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8382274/ /pubmed/34447898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab103 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Siegert, Wolfgang
Krieg, Jochen
Sommerfeld, Vera
Borda-Molina, Daniel
Feuerstein, Dieter
Camarinha-Silva, Amélia
Rodehutscord, Markus
Phytase Supplementation Effects on Amino Acid Digestibility in Broiler Chickens are Influenced by Dietary Calcium Concentrations but not by Acid-Binding Capacity
title Phytase Supplementation Effects on Amino Acid Digestibility in Broiler Chickens are Influenced by Dietary Calcium Concentrations but not by Acid-Binding Capacity
title_full Phytase Supplementation Effects on Amino Acid Digestibility in Broiler Chickens are Influenced by Dietary Calcium Concentrations but not by Acid-Binding Capacity
title_fullStr Phytase Supplementation Effects on Amino Acid Digestibility in Broiler Chickens are Influenced by Dietary Calcium Concentrations but not by Acid-Binding Capacity
title_full_unstemmed Phytase Supplementation Effects on Amino Acid Digestibility in Broiler Chickens are Influenced by Dietary Calcium Concentrations but not by Acid-Binding Capacity
title_short Phytase Supplementation Effects on Amino Acid Digestibility in Broiler Chickens are Influenced by Dietary Calcium Concentrations but not by Acid-Binding Capacity
title_sort phytase supplementation effects on amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens are influenced by dietary calcium concentrations but not by acid-binding capacity
topic ORIGINAL RESEARCH
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab103
work_keys_str_mv AT siegertwolfgang phytasesupplementationeffectsonaminoaciddigestibilityinbroilerchickensareinfluencedbydietarycalciumconcentrationsbutnotbyacidbindingcapacity
AT kriegjochen phytasesupplementationeffectsonaminoaciddigestibilityinbroilerchickensareinfluencedbydietarycalciumconcentrationsbutnotbyacidbindingcapacity
AT sommerfeldvera phytasesupplementationeffectsonaminoaciddigestibilityinbroilerchickensareinfluencedbydietarycalciumconcentrationsbutnotbyacidbindingcapacity
AT bordamolinadaniel phytasesupplementationeffectsonaminoaciddigestibilityinbroilerchickensareinfluencedbydietarycalciumconcentrationsbutnotbyacidbindingcapacity
AT feuersteindieter phytasesupplementationeffectsonaminoaciddigestibilityinbroilerchickensareinfluencedbydietarycalciumconcentrationsbutnotbyacidbindingcapacity
AT camarinhasilvaamelia phytasesupplementationeffectsonaminoaciddigestibilityinbroilerchickensareinfluencedbydietarycalciumconcentrationsbutnotbyacidbindingcapacity
AT rodehutscordmarkus phytasesupplementationeffectsonaminoaciddigestibilityinbroilerchickensareinfluencedbydietarycalciumconcentrationsbutnotbyacidbindingcapacity