Cargando…

Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany

PURPOSE: Since its introduction over a decade ago, the use of robotic surgery (RS) in head and neck surgery has widely spread around the globe, with very differential adoption of this novel surgical technique in different parts of the world. In this study, we analyze the acceptance and adoption of r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandapathil, Magis, Meyer, Jens E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06623-w
_version_ 1783741569576206336
author Mandapathil, Magis
Meyer, Jens E.
author_facet Mandapathil, Magis
Meyer, Jens E.
author_sort Mandapathil, Magis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Since its introduction over a decade ago, the use of robotic surgery (RS) in head and neck surgery has widely spread around the globe, with very differential adoption of this novel surgical technique in different parts of the world. In this study, we analyze the acceptance and adoption of robotic surgery in the head and neck in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis using a questionnaire evaluating the acceptance and adoption of RS was performed. Questionnaires were distributed to all chairmen /-women of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Departments in Germany. RESULTS: A total of 107 respondents completed the questionnaire (65.2%). At university hospitals, 71.4% of the respondents indicated that a robotic system was available, and 21.4% responded that robotic surgery was performed at their institution; 22.7% and 0.04%, respectively, at non-university hospitals. The overall adoption rate was 0.8%. The most common cases performed were TORS resection in the oropharynx. Main reasons for not adopting this technique were costs, lack of interest and available co-operations. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of the extent of adoption of TORS in Germany; main perceived barriers to adoption are costs with lack of cost-covering reimbursement and insufficient co-operations with other disciplines as well as hospital administration resulting in a very low adoption rate of this technique over the past decade. Results from this study may assist in decision-making processes on adopting this technique in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83826112021-09-09 Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany Mandapathil, Magis Meyer, Jens E. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck PURPOSE: Since its introduction over a decade ago, the use of robotic surgery (RS) in head and neck surgery has widely spread around the globe, with very differential adoption of this novel surgical technique in different parts of the world. In this study, we analyze the acceptance and adoption of robotic surgery in the head and neck in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis using a questionnaire evaluating the acceptance and adoption of RS was performed. Questionnaires were distributed to all chairmen /-women of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Departments in Germany. RESULTS: A total of 107 respondents completed the questionnaire (65.2%). At university hospitals, 71.4% of the respondents indicated that a robotic system was available, and 21.4% responded that robotic surgery was performed at their institution; 22.7% and 0.04%, respectively, at non-university hospitals. The overall adoption rate was 0.8%. The most common cases performed were TORS resection in the oropharynx. Main reasons for not adopting this technique were costs, lack of interest and available co-operations. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of the extent of adoption of TORS in Germany; main perceived barriers to adoption are costs with lack of cost-covering reimbursement and insufficient co-operations with other disciplines as well as hospital administration resulting in a very low adoption rate of this technique over the past decade. Results from this study may assist in decision-making processes on adopting this technique in the future. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8382611/ /pubmed/33550435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06623-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Mandapathil, Magis
Meyer, Jens E.
Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany
title Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany
title_full Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany
title_fullStr Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany
title_short Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany
title_sort acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in germany
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06623-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mandapathilmagis acceptanceandadoptionoftransoralroboticsurgeryingermany
AT meyerjense acceptanceandadoptionoftransoralroboticsurgeryingermany