Cargando…

Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy

PURPOSE: Apart from the commonly applied manual needle biopsy, CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of bone lesions can be performed with battery-powered drill biopsy systems. Due to assumably different radiation doses and procedural durations, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zensen, Sebastian, Selvaretnam, Sumitha, Opitz, Marcel, Bos, Denise, Haubold, Johannes, Theysohn, Jens, Forsting, Michael, Guberina, Nika, Wetter, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02851-z
_version_ 1783741574726811648
author Zensen, Sebastian
Selvaretnam, Sumitha
Opitz, Marcel
Bos, Denise
Haubold, Johannes
Theysohn, Jens
Forsting, Michael
Guberina, Nika
Wetter, Axel
author_facet Zensen, Sebastian
Selvaretnam, Sumitha
Opitz, Marcel
Bos, Denise
Haubold, Johannes
Theysohn, Jens
Forsting, Michael
Guberina, Nika
Wetter, Axel
author_sort Zensen, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Apart from the commonly applied manual needle biopsy, CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of bone lesions can be performed with battery-powered drill biopsy systems. Due to assumably different radiation doses and procedural durations, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of CT-guided bone biopsies of different anatomical regions. METHODS: In this retrospective study, dose data of 187 patients who underwent CT-guided bone biopsy with a manual or powered drill biopsy system performed at one of three different multi-slice CT were analyzed. Between January 2012 and November 2019, a total of 27 femur (A), 74 ilium (B), 27 sacrum (C), 28 thoracic vertebrae (D) and 31 lumbar vertebrae (E) biopsies were included. Radiation exposure was reported for volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and dose–length product (DLP). RESULTS: CTDI(vol) and DLP of manual versus powered drill biopsy were (median, IQR): A: 56.9(41.4–128.5)/66.7(37.6–76.2)mGy, 410(203–683)/303(128–403)mGy·cm, B: 83.5(62.1–128.5)/59.4(46.2–79.8)mGy, 489(322–472)/400(329–695)mGy·cm, C: 97.5(71.6–149.2)/63.1(49.1–83.7)mGy, 627(496–740)/404(316–515)mGy·cm, D: 67.0(40.3–86.6)/39.7(29.9–89.0)mGy, 392(267–596)/207(166–402)mGy·cm and E: 100.1(66.5–162.6)/62.5(48.0–90.0)mGy, 521(385–619)/315(240–452)mGy·cm. Radiation exposure with powered drill was significantly lower for ilium and sacrum, while procedural duration was not increased for any anatomical location. Local DRLs could be depicted as follows (CTDI(vol)/DLP): A: 91 mGy/522 mGy·cm, B: 90 mGy/530 mGy·cm, C: 116 mGy/740 mGy·cm, D: 87 mGy/578 mGy·cm and E: 115 mGy/546 mGy·cm. The diagnostic yield was 82.4% for manual and 89.4% for powered drill biopsies. CONCLUSION: Use of powered drill bone biopsy systems for CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsies can significantly reduce the radiation burden compared to manual biopsy for specific anatomical locations such as ilium and sacrum and does not increase radiation dose or procedural duration for any of the investigated locations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83826362021-09-09 Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy Zensen, Sebastian Selvaretnam, Sumitha Opitz, Marcel Bos, Denise Haubold, Johannes Theysohn, Jens Forsting, Michael Guberina, Nika Wetter, Axel Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: Apart from the commonly applied manual needle biopsy, CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of bone lesions can be performed with battery-powered drill biopsy systems. Due to assumably different radiation doses and procedural durations, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of CT-guided bone biopsies of different anatomical regions. METHODS: In this retrospective study, dose data of 187 patients who underwent CT-guided bone biopsy with a manual or powered drill biopsy system performed at one of three different multi-slice CT were analyzed. Between January 2012 and November 2019, a total of 27 femur (A), 74 ilium (B), 27 sacrum (C), 28 thoracic vertebrae (D) and 31 lumbar vertebrae (E) biopsies were included. Radiation exposure was reported for volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and dose–length product (DLP). RESULTS: CTDI(vol) and DLP of manual versus powered drill biopsy were (median, IQR): A: 56.9(41.4–128.5)/66.7(37.6–76.2)mGy, 410(203–683)/303(128–403)mGy·cm, B: 83.5(62.1–128.5)/59.4(46.2–79.8)mGy, 489(322–472)/400(329–695)mGy·cm, C: 97.5(71.6–149.2)/63.1(49.1–83.7)mGy, 627(496–740)/404(316–515)mGy·cm, D: 67.0(40.3–86.6)/39.7(29.9–89.0)mGy, 392(267–596)/207(166–402)mGy·cm and E: 100.1(66.5–162.6)/62.5(48.0–90.0)mGy, 521(385–619)/315(240–452)mGy·cm. Radiation exposure with powered drill was significantly lower for ilium and sacrum, while procedural duration was not increased for any anatomical location. Local DRLs could be depicted as follows (CTDI(vol)/DLP): A: 91 mGy/522 mGy·cm, B: 90 mGy/530 mGy·cm, C: 116 mGy/740 mGy·cm, D: 87 mGy/578 mGy·cm and E: 115 mGy/546 mGy·cm. The diagnostic yield was 82.4% for manual and 89.4% for powered drill biopsies. CONCLUSION: Use of powered drill bone biopsy systems for CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsies can significantly reduce the radiation burden compared to manual biopsy for specific anatomical locations such as ilium and sacrum and does not increase radiation dose or procedural duration for any of the investigated locations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. Springer US 2021-05-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8382636/ /pubmed/33977330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02851-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Zensen, Sebastian
Selvaretnam, Sumitha
Opitz, Marcel
Bos, Denise
Haubold, Johannes
Theysohn, Jens
Forsting, Michael
Guberina, Nika
Wetter, Axel
Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy
title Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy
title_full Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy
title_fullStr Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy
title_short Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy
title_sort differences in radiation exposure of ct-guided percutaneous manual and powered drill bone biopsy
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02851-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zensensebastian differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy
AT selvaretnamsumitha differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy
AT opitzmarcel differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy
AT bosdenise differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy
AT hauboldjohannes differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy
AT theysohnjens differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy
AT forstingmichael differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy
AT guberinanika differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy
AT wetteraxel differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy