Cargando…
Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy
PURPOSE: Apart from the commonly applied manual needle biopsy, CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of bone lesions can be performed with battery-powered drill biopsy systems. Due to assumably different radiation doses and procedural durations, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02851-z |
_version_ | 1783741574726811648 |
---|---|
author | Zensen, Sebastian Selvaretnam, Sumitha Opitz, Marcel Bos, Denise Haubold, Johannes Theysohn, Jens Forsting, Michael Guberina, Nika Wetter, Axel |
author_facet | Zensen, Sebastian Selvaretnam, Sumitha Opitz, Marcel Bos, Denise Haubold, Johannes Theysohn, Jens Forsting, Michael Guberina, Nika Wetter, Axel |
author_sort | Zensen, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Apart from the commonly applied manual needle biopsy, CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of bone lesions can be performed with battery-powered drill biopsy systems. Due to assumably different radiation doses and procedural durations, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of CT-guided bone biopsies of different anatomical regions. METHODS: In this retrospective study, dose data of 187 patients who underwent CT-guided bone biopsy with a manual or powered drill biopsy system performed at one of three different multi-slice CT were analyzed. Between January 2012 and November 2019, a total of 27 femur (A), 74 ilium (B), 27 sacrum (C), 28 thoracic vertebrae (D) and 31 lumbar vertebrae (E) biopsies were included. Radiation exposure was reported for volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and dose–length product (DLP). RESULTS: CTDI(vol) and DLP of manual versus powered drill biopsy were (median, IQR): A: 56.9(41.4–128.5)/66.7(37.6–76.2)mGy, 410(203–683)/303(128–403)mGy·cm, B: 83.5(62.1–128.5)/59.4(46.2–79.8)mGy, 489(322–472)/400(329–695)mGy·cm, C: 97.5(71.6–149.2)/63.1(49.1–83.7)mGy, 627(496–740)/404(316–515)mGy·cm, D: 67.0(40.3–86.6)/39.7(29.9–89.0)mGy, 392(267–596)/207(166–402)mGy·cm and E: 100.1(66.5–162.6)/62.5(48.0–90.0)mGy, 521(385–619)/315(240–452)mGy·cm. Radiation exposure with powered drill was significantly lower for ilium and sacrum, while procedural duration was not increased for any anatomical location. Local DRLs could be depicted as follows (CTDI(vol)/DLP): A: 91 mGy/522 mGy·cm, B: 90 mGy/530 mGy·cm, C: 116 mGy/740 mGy·cm, D: 87 mGy/578 mGy·cm and E: 115 mGy/546 mGy·cm. The diagnostic yield was 82.4% for manual and 89.4% for powered drill biopsies. CONCLUSION: Use of powered drill bone biopsy systems for CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsies can significantly reduce the radiation burden compared to manual biopsy for specific anatomical locations such as ilium and sacrum and does not increase radiation dose or procedural duration for any of the investigated locations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8382636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83826362021-09-09 Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy Zensen, Sebastian Selvaretnam, Sumitha Opitz, Marcel Bos, Denise Haubold, Johannes Theysohn, Jens Forsting, Michael Guberina, Nika Wetter, Axel Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: Apart from the commonly applied manual needle biopsy, CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of bone lesions can be performed with battery-powered drill biopsy systems. Due to assumably different radiation doses and procedural durations, the aim of this study is to examine radiation exposure and establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of CT-guided bone biopsies of different anatomical regions. METHODS: In this retrospective study, dose data of 187 patients who underwent CT-guided bone biopsy with a manual or powered drill biopsy system performed at one of three different multi-slice CT were analyzed. Between January 2012 and November 2019, a total of 27 femur (A), 74 ilium (B), 27 sacrum (C), 28 thoracic vertebrae (D) and 31 lumbar vertebrae (E) biopsies were included. Radiation exposure was reported for volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and dose–length product (DLP). RESULTS: CTDI(vol) and DLP of manual versus powered drill biopsy were (median, IQR): A: 56.9(41.4–128.5)/66.7(37.6–76.2)mGy, 410(203–683)/303(128–403)mGy·cm, B: 83.5(62.1–128.5)/59.4(46.2–79.8)mGy, 489(322–472)/400(329–695)mGy·cm, C: 97.5(71.6–149.2)/63.1(49.1–83.7)mGy, 627(496–740)/404(316–515)mGy·cm, D: 67.0(40.3–86.6)/39.7(29.9–89.0)mGy, 392(267–596)/207(166–402)mGy·cm and E: 100.1(66.5–162.6)/62.5(48.0–90.0)mGy, 521(385–619)/315(240–452)mGy·cm. Radiation exposure with powered drill was significantly lower for ilium and sacrum, while procedural duration was not increased for any anatomical location. Local DRLs could be depicted as follows (CTDI(vol)/DLP): A: 91 mGy/522 mGy·cm, B: 90 mGy/530 mGy·cm, C: 116 mGy/740 mGy·cm, D: 87 mGy/578 mGy·cm and E: 115 mGy/546 mGy·cm. The diagnostic yield was 82.4% for manual and 89.4% for powered drill biopsies. CONCLUSION: Use of powered drill bone biopsy systems for CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsies can significantly reduce the radiation burden compared to manual biopsy for specific anatomical locations such as ilium and sacrum and does not increase radiation dose or procedural duration for any of the investigated locations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. Springer US 2021-05-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8382636/ /pubmed/33977330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02851-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Zensen, Sebastian Selvaretnam, Sumitha Opitz, Marcel Bos, Denise Haubold, Johannes Theysohn, Jens Forsting, Michael Guberina, Nika Wetter, Axel Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy |
title | Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy |
title_full | Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy |
title_fullStr | Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy |
title_short | Differences in Radiation Exposure of CT-Guided Percutaneous Manual and Powered Drill Bone Biopsy |
title_sort | differences in radiation exposure of ct-guided percutaneous manual and powered drill bone biopsy |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33977330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02851-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zensensebastian differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy AT selvaretnamsumitha differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy AT opitzmarcel differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy AT bosdenise differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy AT hauboldjohannes differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy AT theysohnjens differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy AT forstingmichael differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy AT guberinanika differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy AT wetteraxel differencesinradiationexposureofctguidedpercutaneousmanualandpowereddrillbonebiopsy |