Cargando…

The Impact of Action Effects on Infants’ Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months

During the observation of goal-directed actions, infants usually predict the goal at an earlier age when the agent is familiar (e.g., human hand) compared to unfamiliar (e.g., mechanical claw). These findings implicate a crucial role of the developing agentive self for infants’ processing of others’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adam, Maurits, Gumbsch, Christian, Butz, Martin V., Elsner, Birgit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447336
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695550
_version_ 1783741593851789312
author Adam, Maurits
Gumbsch, Christian
Butz, Martin V.
Elsner, Birgit
author_facet Adam, Maurits
Gumbsch, Christian
Butz, Martin V.
Elsner, Birgit
author_sort Adam, Maurits
collection PubMed
description During the observation of goal-directed actions, infants usually predict the goal at an earlier age when the agent is familiar (e.g., human hand) compared to unfamiliar (e.g., mechanical claw). These findings implicate a crucial role of the developing agentive self for infants’ processing of others’ action goals. Recent theoretical accounts suggest that predictive gaze behavior relies on an interplay between infants’ agentive experience (top-down processes) and perceptual information about the agent and the action-event (bottom-up information; e.g., agency cues). The present study examined 7-, 11-, and 18-month-old infants’ predictive gaze behavior for a grasping action performed by an unfamiliar tool, depending on infants’ age-related action knowledge about tool-use and the display of the agency cue of producing a salient action effect. The results are in line with the notion of a systematic interplay between experience-based top-down processes and cue-based bottom-up information: Regardless of the salient action effect, predictive gaze shifts did not occur in the 7-month-olds (least experienced age group), but did occur in the 18-month-olds (most experienced age group). In the 11-month-olds, however, predictive gaze shifts occurred only when a salient action effect was presented. This sheds new light on how the developing agentive self, in interplay with available agency cues, supports infants’ action-goal prediction also for observed tool-use actions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83827172021-08-25 The Impact of Action Effects on Infants’ Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months Adam, Maurits Gumbsch, Christian Butz, Martin V. Elsner, Birgit Front Psychol Psychology During the observation of goal-directed actions, infants usually predict the goal at an earlier age when the agent is familiar (e.g., human hand) compared to unfamiliar (e.g., mechanical claw). These findings implicate a crucial role of the developing agentive self for infants’ processing of others’ action goals. Recent theoretical accounts suggest that predictive gaze behavior relies on an interplay between infants’ agentive experience (top-down processes) and perceptual information about the agent and the action-event (bottom-up information; e.g., agency cues). The present study examined 7-, 11-, and 18-month-old infants’ predictive gaze behavior for a grasping action performed by an unfamiliar tool, depending on infants’ age-related action knowledge about tool-use and the display of the agency cue of producing a salient action effect. The results are in line with the notion of a systematic interplay between experience-based top-down processes and cue-based bottom-up information: Regardless of the salient action effect, predictive gaze shifts did not occur in the 7-month-olds (least experienced age group), but did occur in the 18-month-olds (most experienced age group). In the 11-month-olds, however, predictive gaze shifts occurred only when a salient action effect was presented. This sheds new light on how the developing agentive self, in interplay with available agency cues, supports infants’ action-goal prediction also for observed tool-use actions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8382717/ /pubmed/34447336 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695550 Text en Copyright © 2021 Adam, Gumbsch, Butz and Elsner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Adam, Maurits
Gumbsch, Christian
Butz, Martin V.
Elsner, Birgit
The Impact of Action Effects on Infants’ Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months
title The Impact of Action Effects on Infants’ Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months
title_full The Impact of Action Effects on Infants’ Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months
title_fullStr The Impact of Action Effects on Infants’ Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Action Effects on Infants’ Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months
title_short The Impact of Action Effects on Infants’ Predictive Gaze Shifts for a Non-Human Grasping Action at 7, 11, and 18 Months
title_sort impact of action effects on infants’ predictive gaze shifts for a non-human grasping action at 7, 11, and 18 months
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447336
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695550
work_keys_str_mv AT adammaurits theimpactofactioneffectsoninfantspredictivegazeshiftsforanonhumangraspingactionat711and18months
AT gumbschchristian theimpactofactioneffectsoninfantspredictivegazeshiftsforanonhumangraspingactionat711and18months
AT butzmartinv theimpactofactioneffectsoninfantspredictivegazeshiftsforanonhumangraspingactionat711and18months
AT elsnerbirgit theimpactofactioneffectsoninfantspredictivegazeshiftsforanonhumangraspingactionat711and18months
AT adammaurits impactofactioneffectsoninfantspredictivegazeshiftsforanonhumangraspingactionat711and18months
AT gumbschchristian impactofactioneffectsoninfantspredictivegazeshiftsforanonhumangraspingactionat711and18months
AT butzmartinv impactofactioneffectsoninfantspredictivegazeshiftsforanonhumangraspingactionat711and18months
AT elsnerbirgit impactofactioneffectsoninfantspredictivegazeshiftsforanonhumangraspingactionat711and18months