Cargando…

Midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay

Haptic technologies aim to simulate tactile or kinesthetic interactions with a physical or virtual environment in order to enhance user experience and/or performance. However, due to stringent communication and computational needs, the user experience is influenced by delayed haptic feedback. While...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsuradi, Haneen, Park, Wanjoo, Eid, Mohamad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34426593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95631-1
_version_ 1783741611641929728
author Alsuradi, Haneen
Park, Wanjoo
Eid, Mohamad
author_facet Alsuradi, Haneen
Park, Wanjoo
Eid, Mohamad
author_sort Alsuradi, Haneen
collection PubMed
description Haptic technologies aim to simulate tactile or kinesthetic interactions with a physical or virtual environment in order to enhance user experience and/or performance. However, due to stringent communication and computational needs, the user experience is influenced by delayed haptic feedback. While delayed feedback is well understood in the visual and auditory modalities, little research has systematically examined the neural correlates associated with delayed haptic feedback. In this paper, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to study sensory and cognitive neural correlates caused by haptic delay during passive and active tasks performed using a haptic device and a computer screen. Results revealed that theta power oscillation was significantly higher at the midfrontal cortex under the presence of haptic delay. Sensory correlates represented by beta rebound were found to be similar in the passive task and different in the active task under the delayed and synchronous conditions. Additionally, the event related potential (ERP) P200 component is modulated under the haptic delay condition during the passive task. The P200 amplitude significantly reduced in the last 20% of trials during the passive task and in the absence of haptic delay. Results suggest that haptic delay could be associated with increased cognitive control processes including multi-sensory divided attention followed by conflict detection and resolution with an earlier detection during the active task. Additionally, haptic delay tends to generate greater perceptual attention that does not significantly decay across trials during the passive task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83828262021-09-01 Midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay Alsuradi, Haneen Park, Wanjoo Eid, Mohamad Sci Rep Article Haptic technologies aim to simulate tactile or kinesthetic interactions with a physical or virtual environment in order to enhance user experience and/or performance. However, due to stringent communication and computational needs, the user experience is influenced by delayed haptic feedback. While delayed feedback is well understood in the visual and auditory modalities, little research has systematically examined the neural correlates associated with delayed haptic feedback. In this paper, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to study sensory and cognitive neural correlates caused by haptic delay during passive and active tasks performed using a haptic device and a computer screen. Results revealed that theta power oscillation was significantly higher at the midfrontal cortex under the presence of haptic delay. Sensory correlates represented by beta rebound were found to be similar in the passive task and different in the active task under the delayed and synchronous conditions. Additionally, the event related potential (ERP) P200 component is modulated under the haptic delay condition during the passive task. The P200 amplitude significantly reduced in the last 20% of trials during the passive task and in the absence of haptic delay. Results suggest that haptic delay could be associated with increased cognitive control processes including multi-sensory divided attention followed by conflict detection and resolution with an earlier detection during the active task. Additionally, haptic delay tends to generate greater perceptual attention that does not significantly decay across trials during the passive task. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8382826/ /pubmed/34426593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95631-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Alsuradi, Haneen
Park, Wanjoo
Eid, Mohamad
Midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay
title Midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay
title_full Midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay
title_fullStr Midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay
title_full_unstemmed Midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay
title_short Midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay
title_sort midfrontal theta oscillation encodes haptic delay
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34426593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95631-1
work_keys_str_mv AT alsuradihaneen midfrontalthetaoscillationencodeshapticdelay
AT parkwanjoo midfrontalthetaoscillationencodeshapticdelay
AT eidmohamad midfrontalthetaoscillationencodeshapticdelay