Cargando…

Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain

How are different formats of magnitudes represented in the human brain? We used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation to isolate representations of symbols, quantities, and physical size in 45 adults. Results indicate that the neural correlates supporting the passive processing of number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sokolowski, H Moriah, Hawes, Zachary, Peters, Lien, Ansari, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab048
_version_ 1783741631247155200
author Sokolowski, H Moriah
Hawes, Zachary
Peters, Lien
Ansari, Daniel
author_facet Sokolowski, H Moriah
Hawes, Zachary
Peters, Lien
Ansari, Daniel
author_sort Sokolowski, H Moriah
collection PubMed
description How are different formats of magnitudes represented in the human brain? We used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation to isolate representations of symbols, quantities, and physical size in 45 adults. Results indicate that the neural correlates supporting the passive processing of number symbols are largely dissociable from those supporting quantities and physical size, anatomically and representationally. Anatomically, passive processing of quantities and size correlate with activation in the right intraparietal sulcus, whereas symbolic number processing, compared with quantity processing, correlates with activation in the left inferior parietal lobule. Representationally, neural patterns of activation supporting symbols are dissimilar from neural activation patterns supporting quantity and size in the bilateral parietal lobes. These findings challenge the longstanding notion that the culturally acquired ability to conceptualize symbolic numbers is represented using entirely the same brain systems that support the evolutionarily ancient system used to process quantities. Moreover, these data reveal that regions that support numerical magnitude processing are also important for the processing of non-numerical magnitudes. This discovery compels future investigations of the neural consequences of acquiring knowledge of symbolic numbers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8382912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83829122021-08-25 Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain Sokolowski, H Moriah Hawes, Zachary Peters, Lien Ansari, Daniel Cereb Cortex Commun Original Article How are different formats of magnitudes represented in the human brain? We used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation to isolate representations of symbols, quantities, and physical size in 45 adults. Results indicate that the neural correlates supporting the passive processing of number symbols are largely dissociable from those supporting quantities and physical size, anatomically and representationally. Anatomically, passive processing of quantities and size correlate with activation in the right intraparietal sulcus, whereas symbolic number processing, compared with quantity processing, correlates with activation in the left inferior parietal lobule. Representationally, neural patterns of activation supporting symbols are dissimilar from neural activation patterns supporting quantity and size in the bilateral parietal lobes. These findings challenge the longstanding notion that the culturally acquired ability to conceptualize symbolic numbers is represented using entirely the same brain systems that support the evolutionarily ancient system used to process quantities. Moreover, these data reveal that regions that support numerical magnitude processing are also important for the processing of non-numerical magnitudes. This discovery compels future investigations of the neural consequences of acquiring knowledge of symbolic numbers. Oxford University Press 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8382912/ /pubmed/34447935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab048 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sokolowski, H Moriah
Hawes, Zachary
Peters, Lien
Ansari, Daniel
Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain
title Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain
title_full Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain
title_fullStr Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain
title_full_unstemmed Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain
title_short Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain
title_sort symbols are special: an fmri adaptation study of symbolic, nonsymbolic, and non-numerical magnitude processing in the human brain
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab048
work_keys_str_mv AT sokolowskihmoriah symbolsarespecialanfmriadaptationstudyofsymbolicnonsymbolicandnonnumericalmagnitudeprocessinginthehumanbrain
AT haweszachary symbolsarespecialanfmriadaptationstudyofsymbolicnonsymbolicandnonnumericalmagnitudeprocessinginthehumanbrain
AT peterslien symbolsarespecialanfmriadaptationstudyofsymbolicnonsymbolicandnonnumericalmagnitudeprocessinginthehumanbrain
AT ansaridaniel symbolsarespecialanfmriadaptationstudyofsymbolicnonsymbolicandnonnumericalmagnitudeprocessinginthehumanbrain