Cargando…
Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain
How are different formats of magnitudes represented in the human brain? We used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation to isolate representations of symbols, quantities, and physical size in 45 adults. Results indicate that the neural correlates supporting the passive processing of number...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab048 |
_version_ | 1783741631247155200 |
---|---|
author | Sokolowski, H Moriah Hawes, Zachary Peters, Lien Ansari, Daniel |
author_facet | Sokolowski, H Moriah Hawes, Zachary Peters, Lien Ansari, Daniel |
author_sort | Sokolowski, H Moriah |
collection | PubMed |
description | How are different formats of magnitudes represented in the human brain? We used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation to isolate representations of symbols, quantities, and physical size in 45 adults. Results indicate that the neural correlates supporting the passive processing of number symbols are largely dissociable from those supporting quantities and physical size, anatomically and representationally. Anatomically, passive processing of quantities and size correlate with activation in the right intraparietal sulcus, whereas symbolic number processing, compared with quantity processing, correlates with activation in the left inferior parietal lobule. Representationally, neural patterns of activation supporting symbols are dissimilar from neural activation patterns supporting quantity and size in the bilateral parietal lobes. These findings challenge the longstanding notion that the culturally acquired ability to conceptualize symbolic numbers is represented using entirely the same brain systems that support the evolutionarily ancient system used to process quantities. Moreover, these data reveal that regions that support numerical magnitude processing are also important for the processing of non-numerical magnitudes. This discovery compels future investigations of the neural consequences of acquiring knowledge of symbolic numbers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8382912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83829122021-08-25 Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain Sokolowski, H Moriah Hawes, Zachary Peters, Lien Ansari, Daniel Cereb Cortex Commun Original Article How are different formats of magnitudes represented in the human brain? We used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation to isolate representations of symbols, quantities, and physical size in 45 adults. Results indicate that the neural correlates supporting the passive processing of number symbols are largely dissociable from those supporting quantities and physical size, anatomically and representationally. Anatomically, passive processing of quantities and size correlate with activation in the right intraparietal sulcus, whereas symbolic number processing, compared with quantity processing, correlates with activation in the left inferior parietal lobule. Representationally, neural patterns of activation supporting symbols are dissimilar from neural activation patterns supporting quantity and size in the bilateral parietal lobes. These findings challenge the longstanding notion that the culturally acquired ability to conceptualize symbolic numbers is represented using entirely the same brain systems that support the evolutionarily ancient system used to process quantities. Moreover, these data reveal that regions that support numerical magnitude processing are also important for the processing of non-numerical magnitudes. This discovery compels future investigations of the neural consequences of acquiring knowledge of symbolic numbers. Oxford University Press 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8382912/ /pubmed/34447935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab048 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sokolowski, H Moriah Hawes, Zachary Peters, Lien Ansari, Daniel Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain |
title | Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain |
title_full | Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain |
title_fullStr | Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain |
title_full_unstemmed | Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain |
title_short | Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain |
title_sort | symbols are special: an fmri adaptation study of symbolic, nonsymbolic, and non-numerical magnitude processing in the human brain |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8382912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sokolowskihmoriah symbolsarespecialanfmriadaptationstudyofsymbolicnonsymbolicandnonnumericalmagnitudeprocessinginthehumanbrain AT haweszachary symbolsarespecialanfmriadaptationstudyofsymbolicnonsymbolicandnonnumericalmagnitudeprocessinginthehumanbrain AT peterslien symbolsarespecialanfmriadaptationstudyofsymbolicnonsymbolicandnonnumericalmagnitudeprocessinginthehumanbrain AT ansaridaniel symbolsarespecialanfmriadaptationstudyofsymbolicnonsymbolicandnonnumericalmagnitudeprocessinginthehumanbrain |