Cargando…
A systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a number of complications in everyday life, greatly affecting public health. Estimating its impact on mental health constitutes a priority issue. The current study aims to summarize the scales that have been specifically developed for this reason and are not adaptati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34461356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114183 |
_version_ | 1783741745593319424 |
---|---|
author | Voitsidis, Panteleimon Kerasidou, Maria Dialechti Nikopoulou, Aliki Vasiliki Tsalikidis, Prodromos Parlapani, Eleni Holeva, Vasiliki Diakogiannis, Ioannis |
author_facet | Voitsidis, Panteleimon Kerasidou, Maria Dialechti Nikopoulou, Aliki Vasiliki Tsalikidis, Prodromos Parlapani, Eleni Holeva, Vasiliki Diakogiannis, Ioannis |
author_sort | Voitsidis, Panteleimon |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a number of complications in everyday life, greatly affecting public health. Estimating its impact on mental health constitutes a priority issue. The current study aims to summarize the scales that have been specifically developed for this reason and are not adaptations of already existing scales. A comprehensive search was conducted by two reviewers during the period 28/09/2020–30/09–2020 in the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, ScieLo, Mendeley, Google Scholar. A quality appraisal of the identified scales was made by three reviewers using the COSMIN checklist for methodological issues and the Terwee criteria for measurement properties. Our search strategy yielded a total of 855 results. Of these, 832 articles were excluded according to exclusion criteria, 23 were assessed for eligibility and 10 were finally included. These are presented in the text with additional useful information found separately. The identified scales tended to be quite short and examine stress, anxiety or fear. All studies were cross-sectional and the majority was conducted online. Most of them had a good Cronbach value (> 0.80) and adequate fit indices. It is however noted that the evaluation of their quality may be untimely due to relevant lack of data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8383475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83834752021-08-24 A systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 Voitsidis, Panteleimon Kerasidou, Maria Dialechti Nikopoulou, Aliki Vasiliki Tsalikidis, Prodromos Parlapani, Eleni Holeva, Vasiliki Diakogiannis, Ioannis Psychiatry Res Review Article The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a number of complications in everyday life, greatly affecting public health. Estimating its impact on mental health constitutes a priority issue. The current study aims to summarize the scales that have been specifically developed for this reason and are not adaptations of already existing scales. A comprehensive search was conducted by two reviewers during the period 28/09/2020–30/09–2020 in the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, ScieLo, Mendeley, Google Scholar. A quality appraisal of the identified scales was made by three reviewers using the COSMIN checklist for methodological issues and the Terwee criteria for measurement properties. Our search strategy yielded a total of 855 results. Of these, 832 articles were excluded according to exclusion criteria, 23 were assessed for eligibility and 10 were finally included. These are presented in the text with additional useful information found separately. The identified scales tended to be quite short and examine stress, anxiety or fear. All studies were cross-sectional and the majority was conducted online. Most of them had a good Cronbach value (> 0.80) and adequate fit indices. It is however noted that the evaluation of their quality may be untimely due to relevant lack of data. Elsevier B.V. 2021-11 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8383475/ /pubmed/34461356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114183 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Voitsidis, Panteleimon Kerasidou, Maria Dialechti Nikopoulou, Aliki Vasiliki Tsalikidis, Prodromos Parlapani, Eleni Holeva, Vasiliki Diakogiannis, Ioannis A systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 |
title | A systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 |
title_full | A systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 |
title_short | A systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 |
title_sort | systematic review of questionnaires assessing the psychological impact of covid-19 |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34461356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voitsidispanteleimon asystematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT kerasidoumariadialechti asystematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT nikopouloualikivasiliki asystematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT tsalikidisprodromos asystematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT parlapanieleni asystematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT holevavasiliki asystematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT diakogiannisioannis asystematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT voitsidispanteleimon systematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT kerasidoumariadialechti systematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT nikopouloualikivasiliki systematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT tsalikidisprodromos systematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT parlapanieleni systematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT holevavasiliki systematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 AT diakogiannisioannis systematicreviewofquestionnairesassessingthepsychologicalimpactofcovid19 |