Cargando…

Immune Monitoring Assay for Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment Optimization After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) induces immunological changes that lead to a reduced risk of transplant rejection. The aim of the present study was to determine optimum conditions for ECP treatment by analyzing a variety of tolerance-inducing immune cells to optimize the treatment. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dieterlen, Maja-Theresa, Klaeske, Kristin, Bernhardt, Alexander A., Borger, Michael A., Klein, Sara, Garbade, Jens, Lehmann, Sven, Ayuk, Francis Ayuketang, Reichenspurner, Herrmann, Barten, Markus J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.676175
_version_ 1783741749094514688
author Dieterlen, Maja-Theresa
Klaeske, Kristin
Bernhardt, Alexander A.
Borger, Michael A.
Klein, Sara
Garbade, Jens
Lehmann, Sven
Ayuk, Francis Ayuketang
Reichenspurner, Herrmann
Barten, Markus J.
author_facet Dieterlen, Maja-Theresa
Klaeske, Kristin
Bernhardt, Alexander A.
Borger, Michael A.
Klein, Sara
Garbade, Jens
Lehmann, Sven
Ayuk, Francis Ayuketang
Reichenspurner, Herrmann
Barten, Markus J.
author_sort Dieterlen, Maja-Theresa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) induces immunological changes that lead to a reduced risk of transplant rejection. The aim of the present study was to determine optimum conditions for ECP treatment by analyzing a variety of tolerance-inducing immune cells to optimize the treatment. METHODS: Ten ECP treatments were applied to each of 17 heart-transplant patients from month 3 to month 9 post-HTx. Blood samples were taken at baseline, three times during treatment, and four months after the last ECP treatment. The abundance of subsets of tolerance-inducing regulatory T cells (T(regs)) and dendritic cells (DCs) in the samples was determined by flow cytometry. A multivariate statistical model describing the immunological status of rejection-free heart transplanted patients was used to visualize the patient-specific immunological improvement induced by ECP. RESULTS: All BDCA(+) DC subsets (BDCA1(+) DCs: p < 0.01, BDCA2(+) DCs: p < 0.01, BDCA3(+) DCs: p < 0.01, BDCA4(+) DCs: p < 0.01) as well as total T(regs) (p < 0.01) and CD39(+) T(regs) (p < 0.01) increased during ECP treatment, while CD62L(+) T(regs) decreased (p < 0.01). The cell surface expression level of BDCA1 (p < 0.01) and BDCA4 (p < 0.01) on DCs as well as of CD120b (p < 0.01) on T(regs) increased during the study period, while CD62L expression on T(regs) decreased significantly (p = 0.04). The cell surface expression level of BDCA2 (p = 0.47) and BDCA3 (p = 0.22) on DCs as well as of CD39 (p = 0.14) and CD147 (p = 0.08) on T(regs) remained constant during the study period. A cluster analysis showed that ECP treatment led to a sustained immunological improvement. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an immune monitoring assay for ECP treatment after heart transplantation by analyzing changes in tolerance-inducing immune cells. This assay allowed differentiation of patients who did and did not show immunological improvement. Based on these results, we propose classification criteria that may allow optimization of the duration of ECP treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8383491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83834912021-08-25 Immune Monitoring Assay for Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment Optimization After Heart Transplantation Dieterlen, Maja-Theresa Klaeske, Kristin Bernhardt, Alexander A. Borger, Michael A. Klein, Sara Garbade, Jens Lehmann, Sven Ayuk, Francis Ayuketang Reichenspurner, Herrmann Barten, Markus J. Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) induces immunological changes that lead to a reduced risk of transplant rejection. The aim of the present study was to determine optimum conditions for ECP treatment by analyzing a variety of tolerance-inducing immune cells to optimize the treatment. METHODS: Ten ECP treatments were applied to each of 17 heart-transplant patients from month 3 to month 9 post-HTx. Blood samples were taken at baseline, three times during treatment, and four months after the last ECP treatment. The abundance of subsets of tolerance-inducing regulatory T cells (T(regs)) and dendritic cells (DCs) in the samples was determined by flow cytometry. A multivariate statistical model describing the immunological status of rejection-free heart transplanted patients was used to visualize the patient-specific immunological improvement induced by ECP. RESULTS: All BDCA(+) DC subsets (BDCA1(+) DCs: p < 0.01, BDCA2(+) DCs: p < 0.01, BDCA3(+) DCs: p < 0.01, BDCA4(+) DCs: p < 0.01) as well as total T(regs) (p < 0.01) and CD39(+) T(regs) (p < 0.01) increased during ECP treatment, while CD62L(+) T(regs) decreased (p < 0.01). The cell surface expression level of BDCA1 (p < 0.01) and BDCA4 (p < 0.01) on DCs as well as of CD120b (p < 0.01) on T(regs) increased during the study period, while CD62L expression on T(regs) decreased significantly (p = 0.04). The cell surface expression level of BDCA2 (p = 0.47) and BDCA3 (p = 0.22) on DCs as well as of CD39 (p = 0.14) and CD147 (p = 0.08) on T(regs) remained constant during the study period. A cluster analysis showed that ECP treatment led to a sustained immunological improvement. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an immune monitoring assay for ECP treatment after heart transplantation by analyzing changes in tolerance-inducing immune cells. This assay allowed differentiation of patients who did and did not show immunological improvement. Based on these results, we propose classification criteria that may allow optimization of the duration of ECP treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8383491/ /pubmed/34447372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.676175 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dieterlen, Klaeske, Bernhardt, Borger, Klein, Garbade, Lehmann, Ayuk, Reichenspurner and Barten https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Dieterlen, Maja-Theresa
Klaeske, Kristin
Bernhardt, Alexander A.
Borger, Michael A.
Klein, Sara
Garbade, Jens
Lehmann, Sven
Ayuk, Francis Ayuketang
Reichenspurner, Herrmann
Barten, Markus J.
Immune Monitoring Assay for Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment Optimization After Heart Transplantation
title Immune Monitoring Assay for Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment Optimization After Heart Transplantation
title_full Immune Monitoring Assay for Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment Optimization After Heart Transplantation
title_fullStr Immune Monitoring Assay for Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment Optimization After Heart Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Immune Monitoring Assay for Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment Optimization After Heart Transplantation
title_short Immune Monitoring Assay for Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment Optimization After Heart Transplantation
title_sort immune monitoring assay for extracorporeal photopheresis treatment optimization after heart transplantation
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.676175
work_keys_str_mv AT dieterlenmajatheresa immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT klaeskekristin immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT bernhardtalexandera immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT borgermichaela immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT kleinsara immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT garbadejens immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT lehmannsven immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT ayukfrancisayuketang immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT reichenspurnerherrmann immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation
AT bartenmarkusj immunemonitoringassayforextracorporealphotopheresistreatmentoptimizationafterhearttransplantation