Cargando…

Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance

Marine biofouling imposes serious environmental and economic impacts on marine applications, especially in the shipping industry. To combat biofouling, protective coatings are applied on vessel hulls which are divided into two major groups: biocidal and non‐toxic fouling release. The current study a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papadatou, Maria, Robson, Samuel C., Dobretsov, Sergey, Watts, Joy E. M., Longyear, Jennifer, Salta, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34459542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1231
_version_ 1783741827514368000
author Papadatou, Maria
Robson, Samuel C.
Dobretsov, Sergey
Watts, Joy E. M.
Longyear, Jennifer
Salta, Maria
author_facet Papadatou, Maria
Robson, Samuel C.
Dobretsov, Sergey
Watts, Joy E. M.
Longyear, Jennifer
Salta, Maria
author_sort Papadatou, Maria
collection PubMed
description Marine biofouling imposes serious environmental and economic impacts on marine applications, especially in the shipping industry. To combat biofouling, protective coatings are applied on vessel hulls which are divided into two major groups: biocidal and non‐toxic fouling release. The current study aimed to explore the effect of coating type on microbial biofilm community profiles to better understand the differences between the communities developed on fouling control biocidal antifouling and biocidal‐free coatings. Biocidal (Intersmooth® 7460HS SPC), fouling release (Intersleek® 900), and inert surfaces were deployed in the marine environment for 4 months, and the biofilms that developed on these surfaces were investigated using Illumina NGS sequencing, targeting the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene. The results confirmed differences in the community profiles between coating types. The biocidal coating supported communities dominated by Alphaproteobacteria (Loktanella, Sphingorhabdus, Erythrobacter) and Bacteroidetes (Gilvibacter), while other taxa, such as Portibacter and Sva0996 marine group, proliferated on the fouling‐release surface. Knowledge of these marine biofilm components on fouling control coatings will serve as a guide for future investigations of marine microfouling as well as informing the coatings industry of potential microbial targets for robust coating formulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8383905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83839052021-08-30 Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance Papadatou, Maria Robson, Samuel C. Dobretsov, Sergey Watts, Joy E. M. Longyear, Jennifer Salta, Maria Microbiologyopen Original Articles Marine biofouling imposes serious environmental and economic impacts on marine applications, especially in the shipping industry. To combat biofouling, protective coatings are applied on vessel hulls which are divided into two major groups: biocidal and non‐toxic fouling release. The current study aimed to explore the effect of coating type on microbial biofilm community profiles to better understand the differences between the communities developed on fouling control biocidal antifouling and biocidal‐free coatings. Biocidal (Intersmooth® 7460HS SPC), fouling release (Intersleek® 900), and inert surfaces were deployed in the marine environment for 4 months, and the biofilms that developed on these surfaces were investigated using Illumina NGS sequencing, targeting the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene. The results confirmed differences in the community profiles between coating types. The biocidal coating supported communities dominated by Alphaproteobacteria (Loktanella, Sphingorhabdus, Erythrobacter) and Bacteroidetes (Gilvibacter), while other taxa, such as Portibacter and Sva0996 marine group, proliferated on the fouling‐release surface. Knowledge of these marine biofilm components on fouling control coatings will serve as a guide for future investigations of marine microfouling as well as informing the coatings industry of potential microbial targets for robust coating formulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8383905/ /pubmed/34459542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1231 Text en © 2021 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Papadatou, Maria
Robson, Samuel C.
Dobretsov, Sergey
Watts, Joy E. M.
Longyear, Jennifer
Salta, Maria
Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
title Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
title_full Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
title_fullStr Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
title_full_unstemmed Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
title_short Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
title_sort marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34459542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1231
work_keys_str_mv AT papadatoumaria marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance
AT robsonsamuelc marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance
AT dobretsovsergey marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance
AT wattsjoyem marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance
AT longyearjennifer marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance
AT saltamaria marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance