Cargando…
Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance
Marine biofouling imposes serious environmental and economic impacts on marine applications, especially in the shipping industry. To combat biofouling, protective coatings are applied on vessel hulls which are divided into two major groups: biocidal and non‐toxic fouling release. The current study a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34459542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1231 |
_version_ | 1783741827514368000 |
---|---|
author | Papadatou, Maria Robson, Samuel C. Dobretsov, Sergey Watts, Joy E. M. Longyear, Jennifer Salta, Maria |
author_facet | Papadatou, Maria Robson, Samuel C. Dobretsov, Sergey Watts, Joy E. M. Longyear, Jennifer Salta, Maria |
author_sort | Papadatou, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Marine biofouling imposes serious environmental and economic impacts on marine applications, especially in the shipping industry. To combat biofouling, protective coatings are applied on vessel hulls which are divided into two major groups: biocidal and non‐toxic fouling release. The current study aimed to explore the effect of coating type on microbial biofilm community profiles to better understand the differences between the communities developed on fouling control biocidal antifouling and biocidal‐free coatings. Biocidal (Intersmooth® 7460HS SPC), fouling release (Intersleek® 900), and inert surfaces were deployed in the marine environment for 4 months, and the biofilms that developed on these surfaces were investigated using Illumina NGS sequencing, targeting the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene. The results confirmed differences in the community profiles between coating types. The biocidal coating supported communities dominated by Alphaproteobacteria (Loktanella, Sphingorhabdus, Erythrobacter) and Bacteroidetes (Gilvibacter), while other taxa, such as Portibacter and Sva0996 marine group, proliferated on the fouling‐release surface. Knowledge of these marine biofilm components on fouling control coatings will serve as a guide for future investigations of marine microfouling as well as informing the coatings industry of potential microbial targets for robust coating formulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8383905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83839052021-08-30 Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance Papadatou, Maria Robson, Samuel C. Dobretsov, Sergey Watts, Joy E. M. Longyear, Jennifer Salta, Maria Microbiologyopen Original Articles Marine biofouling imposes serious environmental and economic impacts on marine applications, especially in the shipping industry. To combat biofouling, protective coatings are applied on vessel hulls which are divided into two major groups: biocidal and non‐toxic fouling release. The current study aimed to explore the effect of coating type on microbial biofilm community profiles to better understand the differences between the communities developed on fouling control biocidal antifouling and biocidal‐free coatings. Biocidal (Intersmooth® 7460HS SPC), fouling release (Intersleek® 900), and inert surfaces were deployed in the marine environment for 4 months, and the biofilms that developed on these surfaces were investigated using Illumina NGS sequencing, targeting the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene. The results confirmed differences in the community profiles between coating types. The biocidal coating supported communities dominated by Alphaproteobacteria (Loktanella, Sphingorhabdus, Erythrobacter) and Bacteroidetes (Gilvibacter), while other taxa, such as Portibacter and Sva0996 marine group, proliferated on the fouling‐release surface. Knowledge of these marine biofilm components on fouling control coatings will serve as a guide for future investigations of marine microfouling as well as informing the coatings industry of potential microbial targets for robust coating formulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8383905/ /pubmed/34459542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1231 Text en © 2021 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Papadatou, Maria Robson, Samuel C. Dobretsov, Sergey Watts, Joy E. M. Longyear, Jennifer Salta, Maria Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance |
title | Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance |
title_full | Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance |
title_fullStr | Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance |
title_full_unstemmed | Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance |
title_short | Marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance |
title_sort | marine biofilms on different fouling control coating types reveal differences in microbial community composition and abundance |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34459542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papadatoumaria marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance AT robsonsamuelc marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance AT dobretsovsergey marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance AT wattsjoyem marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance AT longyearjennifer marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance AT saltamaria marinebiofilmsondifferentfoulingcontrolcoatingtypesrevealdifferencesinmicrobialcommunitycompositionandabundance |