Cargando…

Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment

Aim: COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. Materials & methods: Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Studders, Carson, Fraser, Ian, Giles, Joshua W, Willerth, Stephanie M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Future Medicine Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460874
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0005
_version_ 1783741878671245312
author Studders, Carson
Fraser, Ian
Giles, Joshua W
Willerth, Stephanie M
author_facet Studders, Carson
Fraser, Ian
Giles, Joshua W
Willerth, Stephanie M
author_sort Studders, Carson
collection PubMed
description Aim: COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. Materials & methods: Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), shell thickness (0.8, 1.2 mm), line width (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm), and layer height (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm) were evaluated through tensile testing, finite element analysis, and printing time. Results: Strength increased with increased infill (p < 0.001) and shell thickness (p < 0.001). Layer height had no effect on strength. Increasing line width increased strength (p < 0.001). Discussion: Increasing layer height and line width decreased print time by 50 and 39%, respectively. Increased shell thickness did not alter print time. These changes are recommended for printing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8384239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Future Medicine Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83842392021-08-25 Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment Studders, Carson Fraser, Ian Giles, Joshua W Willerth, Stephanie M J 3D Print Med Research Article Aim: COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. Materials & methods: Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), shell thickness (0.8, 1.2 mm), line width (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm), and layer height (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm) were evaluated through tensile testing, finite element analysis, and printing time. Results: Strength increased with increased infill (p < 0.001) and shell thickness (p < 0.001). Layer height had no effect on strength. Increasing line width increased strength (p < 0.001). Discussion: Increasing layer height and line width decreased print time by 50 and 39%, respectively. Increased shell thickness did not alter print time. These changes are recommended for printing. Future Medicine Ltd 2021-08-20 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8384239/ /pubmed/34460874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0005 Text en © 2021 Future Medicine Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Studders, Carson
Fraser, Ian
Giles, Joshua W
Willerth, Stephanie M
Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
title Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
title_full Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
title_fullStr Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
title_short Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
title_sort evaluation of 3d-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460874
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0005
work_keys_str_mv AT studderscarson evaluationof3dprintersettingsforproducingpersonalprotectiveequipment
AT fraserian evaluationof3dprintersettingsforproducingpersonalprotectiveequipment
AT gilesjoshuaw evaluationof3dprintersettingsforproducingpersonalprotectiveequipment
AT willerthstephaniem evaluationof3dprintersettingsforproducingpersonalprotectiveequipment