Cargando…
Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
Aim: COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. Materials & methods: Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), sh...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Future Medicine Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0005 |
_version_ | 1783741878671245312 |
---|---|
author | Studders, Carson Fraser, Ian Giles, Joshua W Willerth, Stephanie M |
author_facet | Studders, Carson Fraser, Ian Giles, Joshua W Willerth, Stephanie M |
author_sort | Studders, Carson |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. Materials & methods: Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), shell thickness (0.8, 1.2 mm), line width (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm), and layer height (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm) were evaluated through tensile testing, finite element analysis, and printing time. Results: Strength increased with increased infill (p < 0.001) and shell thickness (p < 0.001). Layer height had no effect on strength. Increasing line width increased strength (p < 0.001). Discussion: Increasing layer height and line width decreased print time by 50 and 39%, respectively. Increased shell thickness did not alter print time. These changes are recommended for printing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8384239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Future Medicine Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83842392021-08-25 Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment Studders, Carson Fraser, Ian Giles, Joshua W Willerth, Stephanie M J 3D Print Med Research Article Aim: COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. Materials & methods: Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), shell thickness (0.8, 1.2 mm), line width (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm), and layer height (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm) were evaluated through tensile testing, finite element analysis, and printing time. Results: Strength increased with increased infill (p < 0.001) and shell thickness (p < 0.001). Layer height had no effect on strength. Increasing line width increased strength (p < 0.001). Discussion: Increasing layer height and line width decreased print time by 50 and 39%, respectively. Increased shell thickness did not alter print time. These changes are recommended for printing. Future Medicine Ltd 2021-08-20 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8384239/ /pubmed/34460874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0005 Text en © 2021 Future Medicine Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research Article Studders, Carson Fraser, Ian Giles, Joshua W Willerth, Stephanie M Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment |
title | Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment |
title_full | Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment |
title_short | Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment |
title_sort | evaluation of 3d-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460874 http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT studderscarson evaluationof3dprintersettingsforproducingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT fraserian evaluationof3dprintersettingsforproducingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT gilesjoshuaw evaluationof3dprintersettingsforproducingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT willerthstephaniem evaluationof3dprintersettingsforproducingpersonalprotectiveequipment |