Cargando…

Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples

PURPOSE: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly used for treatment selection in patients with advanced cancer; however, tissue availability may limit widespread implementation. Here, we established real-world CGP tissue availability and assessed CGP performance on consecu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomlins, Scott A., Hovelson, Daniel H., Suga, Jennifer M., Anderson, Daniel M., Koh, Han A., Dees, Elizabeth C., McNulty, Brendan, Burkard, Mark E., Guarino, Michael, Khatri, Jamil, Safa, Malek M., Matrana, Marc R., Yang, Eddy S., Menter, Alex R., Parsons, Benjamin M., Slim, Jennifer N., Thompson, Michael A., Hwang, Leon, Edenfield, William J., Nair, Suresh, Onitilo, Adedayo, Siegel, Robert, Miller, Alan, Wassenaar, Timothy, Irvin, William J., Schulz, William, Padmanabhan, Arvinda, Harish, Vallathucherry, Gonzalez, Anneliese, Mansoor, Abdul Hai, Kellum, Andrew, Harms, Paul, Drewery, Stephanie, Falkner, Jayson, Fischer, Andrew, Hipp, Jennifer, Kwiatkowski, Kat, Lazo de la Vega, Lorena, Mitchell, Khalis, Reeder, Travis, Siddiqui, Javed, Vakil, Hana, Johnson, D. Bryan, Rhodes, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00472
_version_ 1783741908024033280
author Tomlins, Scott A.
Hovelson, Daniel H.
Suga, Jennifer M.
Anderson, Daniel M.
Koh, Han A.
Dees, Elizabeth C.
McNulty, Brendan
Burkard, Mark E.
Guarino, Michael
Khatri, Jamil
Safa, Malek M.
Matrana, Marc R.
Yang, Eddy S.
Menter, Alex R.
Parsons, Benjamin M.
Slim, Jennifer N.
Thompson, Michael A.
Hwang, Leon
Edenfield, William J.
Nair, Suresh
Onitilo, Adedayo
Siegel, Robert
Miller, Alan
Wassenaar, Timothy
Irvin, William J.
Schulz, William
Padmanabhan, Arvinda
Harish, Vallathucherry
Gonzalez, Anneliese
Mansoor, Abdul Hai
Kellum, Andrew
Harms, Paul
Drewery, Stephanie
Falkner, Jayson
Fischer, Andrew
Hipp, Jennifer
Kwiatkowski, Kat
Lazo de la Vega, Lorena
Mitchell, Khalis
Reeder, Travis
Siddiqui, Javed
Vakil, Hana
Johnson, D. Bryan
Rhodes, Daniel R.
author_facet Tomlins, Scott A.
Hovelson, Daniel H.
Suga, Jennifer M.
Anderson, Daniel M.
Koh, Han A.
Dees, Elizabeth C.
McNulty, Brendan
Burkard, Mark E.
Guarino, Michael
Khatri, Jamil
Safa, Malek M.
Matrana, Marc R.
Yang, Eddy S.
Menter, Alex R.
Parsons, Benjamin M.
Slim, Jennifer N.
Thompson, Michael A.
Hwang, Leon
Edenfield, William J.
Nair, Suresh
Onitilo, Adedayo
Siegel, Robert
Miller, Alan
Wassenaar, Timothy
Irvin, William J.
Schulz, William
Padmanabhan, Arvinda
Harish, Vallathucherry
Gonzalez, Anneliese
Mansoor, Abdul Hai
Kellum, Andrew
Harms, Paul
Drewery, Stephanie
Falkner, Jayson
Fischer, Andrew
Hipp, Jennifer
Kwiatkowski, Kat
Lazo de la Vega, Lorena
Mitchell, Khalis
Reeder, Travis
Siddiqui, Javed
Vakil, Hana
Johnson, D. Bryan
Rhodes, Daniel R.
author_sort Tomlins, Scott A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly used for treatment selection in patients with advanced cancer; however, tissue availability may limit widespread implementation. Here, we established real-world CGP tissue availability and assessed CGP performance on consecutively received samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a post hoc, nonprespecified analysis of 32,048 consecutive tumor tissue samples received for StrataNGS, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based comprehensive genomic profiling (PCR-CGP) test, as part of an ongoing observational trial (NCT03061305). Sample characteristics and PCR-CGP performance were assessed across all tested samples, including exception samples not meeting minimum input quality control (QC) requirements (< 20% tumor content [TC], < 2 mm(2) tumor surface area [TSA], DNA or RNA yield < 1 ng/µL, or specimen age > 5 years). Tests reporting ≥ 1 prioritized alteration or meeting TC and sequencing QC were considered successful. For prostate carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, tests reporting ≥ 1 actionable or informative alteration or meeting TC and sequencing QC were considered actionable. RESULTS: Among 31,165 (97.2%) samples where PCR-CGP was attempted, 10.7% had < 20% TC and 59.2% were small (< 25 mm(2) tumor surface area). Of 31,101 samples evaluable for input requirements, 8,089 (26.0%) were exceptions not meeting requirements. However, 94.2% of the 31,101 tested samples were successfully reported, including 80.5% of exception samples. Positive predictive value of PCR-CGP for ERBB2 amplification in exceptions and/or sequencing QC-failure breast cancer samples was 96.7%. Importantly, 84.0% of tested prostate carcinomas and 87.9% of lung adenocarcinomas yielded results informing treatment selection. CONCLUSION: Most real-world tissue samples from patients with advanced cancer desiring CGP are limited, requiring optimized CGP approaches to produce meaningful results. An optimized PCR-CGP test, coupled with an inclusive exception testing policy, delivered reportable results for > 94% of samples, potentially expanding the proportion of CGP-testable patients and impact of biomarker-guided therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8384401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83844012021-09-01 Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples Tomlins, Scott A. Hovelson, Daniel H. Suga, Jennifer M. Anderson, Daniel M. Koh, Han A. Dees, Elizabeth C. McNulty, Brendan Burkard, Mark E. Guarino, Michael Khatri, Jamil Safa, Malek M. Matrana, Marc R. Yang, Eddy S. Menter, Alex R. Parsons, Benjamin M. Slim, Jennifer N. Thompson, Michael A. Hwang, Leon Edenfield, William J. Nair, Suresh Onitilo, Adedayo Siegel, Robert Miller, Alan Wassenaar, Timothy Irvin, William J. Schulz, William Padmanabhan, Arvinda Harish, Vallathucherry Gonzalez, Anneliese Mansoor, Abdul Hai Kellum, Andrew Harms, Paul Drewery, Stephanie Falkner, Jayson Fischer, Andrew Hipp, Jennifer Kwiatkowski, Kat Lazo de la Vega, Lorena Mitchell, Khalis Reeder, Travis Siddiqui, Javed Vakil, Hana Johnson, D. Bryan Rhodes, Daniel R. JCO Precis Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly used for treatment selection in patients with advanced cancer; however, tissue availability may limit widespread implementation. Here, we established real-world CGP tissue availability and assessed CGP performance on consecutively received samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a post hoc, nonprespecified analysis of 32,048 consecutive tumor tissue samples received for StrataNGS, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based comprehensive genomic profiling (PCR-CGP) test, as part of an ongoing observational trial (NCT03061305). Sample characteristics and PCR-CGP performance were assessed across all tested samples, including exception samples not meeting minimum input quality control (QC) requirements (< 20% tumor content [TC], < 2 mm(2) tumor surface area [TSA], DNA or RNA yield < 1 ng/µL, or specimen age > 5 years). Tests reporting ≥ 1 prioritized alteration or meeting TC and sequencing QC were considered successful. For prostate carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, tests reporting ≥ 1 actionable or informative alteration or meeting TC and sequencing QC were considered actionable. RESULTS: Among 31,165 (97.2%) samples where PCR-CGP was attempted, 10.7% had < 20% TC and 59.2% were small (< 25 mm(2) tumor surface area). Of 31,101 samples evaluable for input requirements, 8,089 (26.0%) were exceptions not meeting requirements. However, 94.2% of the 31,101 tested samples were successfully reported, including 80.5% of exception samples. Positive predictive value of PCR-CGP for ERBB2 amplification in exceptions and/or sequencing QC-failure breast cancer samples was 96.7%. Importantly, 84.0% of tested prostate carcinomas and 87.9% of lung adenocarcinomas yielded results informing treatment selection. CONCLUSION: Most real-world tissue samples from patients with advanced cancer desiring CGP are limited, requiring optimized CGP approaches to produce meaningful results. An optimized PCR-CGP test, coupled with an inclusive exception testing policy, delivered reportable results for > 94% of samples, potentially expanding the proportion of CGP-testable patients and impact of biomarker-guided therapies. Wolters Kluwer Health 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8384401/ /pubmed/34476329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00472 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Tomlins, Scott A.
Hovelson, Daniel H.
Suga, Jennifer M.
Anderson, Daniel M.
Koh, Han A.
Dees, Elizabeth C.
McNulty, Brendan
Burkard, Mark E.
Guarino, Michael
Khatri, Jamil
Safa, Malek M.
Matrana, Marc R.
Yang, Eddy S.
Menter, Alex R.
Parsons, Benjamin M.
Slim, Jennifer N.
Thompson, Michael A.
Hwang, Leon
Edenfield, William J.
Nair, Suresh
Onitilo, Adedayo
Siegel, Robert
Miller, Alan
Wassenaar, Timothy
Irvin, William J.
Schulz, William
Padmanabhan, Arvinda
Harish, Vallathucherry
Gonzalez, Anneliese
Mansoor, Abdul Hai
Kellum, Andrew
Harms, Paul
Drewery, Stephanie
Falkner, Jayson
Fischer, Andrew
Hipp, Jennifer
Kwiatkowski, Kat
Lazo de la Vega, Lorena
Mitchell, Khalis
Reeder, Travis
Siddiqui, Javed
Vakil, Hana
Johnson, D. Bryan
Rhodes, Daniel R.
Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples
title Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples
title_full Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples
title_fullStr Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples
title_short Real-World Performance of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test Optimized for Small Tumor Samples
title_sort real-world performance of a comprehensive genomic profiling test optimized for small tumor samples
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00472
work_keys_str_mv AT tomlinsscotta realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT hovelsondanielh realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT sugajenniferm realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT andersondanielm realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT kohhana realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT deeselizabethc realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT mcnultybrendan realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT burkardmarke realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT guarinomichael realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT khatrijamil realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT safamalekm realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT matranamarcr realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT yangeddys realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT menteralexr realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT parsonsbenjaminm realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT slimjennifern realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT thompsonmichaela realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT hwangleon realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT edenfieldwilliamj realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT nairsuresh realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT onitiloadedayo realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT siegelrobert realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT milleralan realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT wassenaartimothy realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT irvinwilliamj realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT schulzwilliam realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT padmanabhanarvinda realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT harishvallathucherry realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT gonzalezanneliese realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT mansoorabdulhai realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT kellumandrew realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT harmspaul realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT drewerystephanie realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT falknerjayson realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT fischerandrew realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT hippjennifer realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT kwiatkowskikat realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT lazodelavegalorena realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT mitchellkhalis realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT reedertravis realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT siddiquijaved realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT vakilhana realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT johnsondbryan realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples
AT rhodesdanielr realworldperformanceofacomprehensivegenomicprofilingtestoptimizedforsmalltumorsamples