Cargando…

Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION: The gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) is a common and important challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of neostigmine and metoclopramide on GRV among MV patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: In a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahat-Dahmardeh, Alireza, Saneie-Moghadam, Sara, Khosh-Fetrat, Masoum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5550653
_version_ 1783741936981508096
author Rahat-Dahmardeh, Alireza
Saneie-Moghadam, Sara
Khosh-Fetrat, Masoum
author_facet Rahat-Dahmardeh, Alireza
Saneie-Moghadam, Sara
Khosh-Fetrat, Masoum
author_sort Rahat-Dahmardeh, Alireza
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) is a common and important challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of neostigmine and metoclopramide on GRV among MV patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, a total of 200 mechanically ventilated ICU patients with GRV > 120 ml (6 hours after the last gavage) were randomly assigned into two groups (A and B) with 100 patients in each group. Patients in groups A and B received intravenous infusion of neostigmine at a dose of 2.5 mg/100 ml normal saline and metoclopramide at a dose of 10 mg/100 ml normal saline, within 30 minutes, respectively. GRV was evaluated 5 times for each patient, once before the intervention and 4 times (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours) after the intervention. In addition, demographic characteristics including age and gender, as well as severity illness based on the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA), were initially recorded for all patients. RESULTS: After adjusting of demographic and clinical characteristics (age, gender, and SOFA score), the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model revealed that neostigmine treatment increased odds of GRV improvement compared to the metoclopramide group (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.60-3.76, P < 0.001). However, there is a statistically significant time trend (within-subject differences or time effect) regardless of treatment groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to the results, although neostigmine treatment significantly improved GRV in more patients in less time, within 12 hours of treatment, all patients in both groups had complete recovery. Considering that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of side effects, it seems that both drugs are effective in improving the GRV of ICU patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8384548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83845482021-08-25 Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Rahat-Dahmardeh, Alireza Saneie-Moghadam, Sara Khosh-Fetrat, Masoum Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: The gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) is a common and important challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of neostigmine and metoclopramide on GRV among MV patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, a total of 200 mechanically ventilated ICU patients with GRV > 120 ml (6 hours after the last gavage) were randomly assigned into two groups (A and B) with 100 patients in each group. Patients in groups A and B received intravenous infusion of neostigmine at a dose of 2.5 mg/100 ml normal saline and metoclopramide at a dose of 10 mg/100 ml normal saline, within 30 minutes, respectively. GRV was evaluated 5 times for each patient, once before the intervention and 4 times (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours) after the intervention. In addition, demographic characteristics including age and gender, as well as severity illness based on the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA), were initially recorded for all patients. RESULTS: After adjusting of demographic and clinical characteristics (age, gender, and SOFA score), the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model revealed that neostigmine treatment increased odds of GRV improvement compared to the metoclopramide group (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.60-3.76, P < 0.001). However, there is a statistically significant time trend (within-subject differences or time effect) regardless of treatment groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to the results, although neostigmine treatment significantly improved GRV in more patients in less time, within 12 hours of treatment, all patients in both groups had complete recovery. Considering that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of side effects, it seems that both drugs are effective in improving the GRV of ICU patients. Hindawi 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8384548/ /pubmed/34447851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5550653 Text en Copyright © 2021 Alireza Rahat-Dahmardeh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rahat-Dahmardeh, Alireza
Saneie-Moghadam, Sara
Khosh-Fetrat, Masoum
Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparing the Effect of Neostigmine and Metoclopramide on Gastric Residual Volume of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparing the effect of neostigmine and metoclopramide on gastric residual volume of mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5550653
work_keys_str_mv AT rahatdahmardehalireza comparingtheeffectofneostigmineandmetoclopramideongastricresidualvolumeofmechanicallyventilatedpatientsinintensivecareunitadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT saneiemoghadamsara comparingtheeffectofneostigmineandmetoclopramideongastricresidualvolumeofmechanicallyventilatedpatientsinintensivecareunitadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT khoshfetratmasoum comparingtheeffectofneostigmineandmetoclopramideongastricresidualvolumeofmechanicallyventilatedpatientsinintensivecareunitadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial