Cargando…

Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model

BACKGROUND: Locking plate fixation in osteoporotic ankle fractures may fail due to cut-out or metalwork failure. Fibula pro-tibia fixation was a technique prior to the advent of locking plates that was used to enhance stability in ankle fractures by achieving tri or tetra-cortical fixation. With loc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okoro, Tosan, Teoh, Kar Hao, Tanaka, Hiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485101
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i8.548
_version_ 1783741949271867392
author Okoro, Tosan
Teoh, Kar Hao
Tanaka, Hiro
author_facet Okoro, Tosan
Teoh, Kar Hao
Tanaka, Hiro
author_sort Okoro, Tosan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Locking plate fixation in osteoporotic ankle fractures may fail due to cut-out or metalwork failure. Fibula pro-tibia fixation was a technique prior to the advent of locking plates that was used to enhance stability in ankle fractures by achieving tri or tetra-cortical fixation. With locking plates, the strength of this fixation construct can be further enhanced. There is lack of evidence currently on the merits of tibia-pro-fibula augmented locking plate fixation of unstable ankle fractures. AIM: To assess if there is increased strength to failure, in an ankle fracture saw bone model, with a fibula pro-tibia construct when compared with standard locking plate fixation. METHODS: Ten osteoporotic saw bones with simulated supination external rotation injuries were used. Five saw bones were fixed with standard locking plates whilst the other 5 saw bones were fixed with locking plates in a fibula pro-tibia construct. The fibula pro-tibia construct involved fixation with 3 consecutive locking screws applied across 3 cortices proximally from the level of the syndesmosis. All fixations were tested in axial external rotation to failure on an electromagnetic test frame (MTS 858 Mini-Bionix test machine, MTS Corp, Eden Praire, MN, United States). Torque at 30 degrees external rotation, failure torque, and external rotation angle at failure were compared between both groups and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The fibula pro-tibia construct demonstrated a statistically higher torque at 30 degrees external rotation (4.421 ± 0.796 N/m vs 1.451 ± 0.467 N/m; t-test P = 0.000), as well as maximum torque at failure (5.079 ± 0.694N/m vs 2.299 ± 0.931 N/m; t-test P = 0.001) compared to the standard locking plate construct. The fibula pro-tibia construct also had a lower external rotation angle at failure (54.7 ± 14.5 vs 67.7 ± 22.9). CONCLUSION: The fibula pro-tibia locking plate construct demonstrates biomechanical superiority to standard locking plates in fixation of unstable ankle fractures in this saw bone model. There is merit in the use of this construct in patients with unstable osteoporotic ankle fractures as it may aid improved clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8384614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83846142021-09-02 Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model Okoro, Tosan Teoh, Kar Hao Tanaka, Hiro World J Orthop Basic Study BACKGROUND: Locking plate fixation in osteoporotic ankle fractures may fail due to cut-out or metalwork failure. Fibula pro-tibia fixation was a technique prior to the advent of locking plates that was used to enhance stability in ankle fractures by achieving tri or tetra-cortical fixation. With locking plates, the strength of this fixation construct can be further enhanced. There is lack of evidence currently on the merits of tibia-pro-fibula augmented locking plate fixation of unstable ankle fractures. AIM: To assess if there is increased strength to failure, in an ankle fracture saw bone model, with a fibula pro-tibia construct when compared with standard locking plate fixation. METHODS: Ten osteoporotic saw bones with simulated supination external rotation injuries were used. Five saw bones were fixed with standard locking plates whilst the other 5 saw bones were fixed with locking plates in a fibula pro-tibia construct. The fibula pro-tibia construct involved fixation with 3 consecutive locking screws applied across 3 cortices proximally from the level of the syndesmosis. All fixations were tested in axial external rotation to failure on an electromagnetic test frame (MTS 858 Mini-Bionix test machine, MTS Corp, Eden Praire, MN, United States). Torque at 30 degrees external rotation, failure torque, and external rotation angle at failure were compared between both groups and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The fibula pro-tibia construct demonstrated a statistically higher torque at 30 degrees external rotation (4.421 ± 0.796 N/m vs 1.451 ± 0.467 N/m; t-test P = 0.000), as well as maximum torque at failure (5.079 ± 0.694N/m vs 2.299 ± 0.931 N/m; t-test P = 0.001) compared to the standard locking plate construct. The fibula pro-tibia construct also had a lower external rotation angle at failure (54.7 ± 14.5 vs 67.7 ± 22.9). CONCLUSION: The fibula pro-tibia locking plate construct demonstrates biomechanical superiority to standard locking plates in fixation of unstable ankle fractures in this saw bone model. There is merit in the use of this construct in patients with unstable osteoporotic ankle fractures as it may aid improved clinical outcomes. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8384614/ /pubmed/34485101 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i8.548 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Basic Study
Okoro, Tosan
Teoh, Kar Hao
Tanaka, Hiro
Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model
title Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model
title_full Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model
title_fullStr Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model
title_full_unstemmed Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model
title_short Fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model
title_sort fibula pro-tibia vs standard locking plate fixation in an ankle fracture saw bone model
topic Basic Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485101
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i8.548
work_keys_str_mv AT okorotosan fibulaprotibiavsstandardlockingplatefixationinananklefracturesawbonemodel
AT teohkarhao fibulaprotibiavsstandardlockingplatefixationinananklefracturesawbonemodel
AT tanakahiro fibulaprotibiavsstandardlockingplatefixationinananklefracturesawbonemodel