Cargando…

A Real-World, Prospective, Non-interventional Study of Adults with T2D Switching to IDegAsp from Glargine U100 or U300 in Japan

INTRODUCTION: This real-world study investigated glycaemic control and quality of life (QoL) in insulin-experienced Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who switched to insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp). METHODS: This was a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, single-arm stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shigiyama, Fumika, Liu, Lei, Nordahl, Helene, Suzuki, Ryo, Yamamoto, Yuiko, Hirose, Takahisa
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:	Original Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34304385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01117-8

Ejemplares similares

Efficacy of IDegLira Versus IDegAsp Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study by isCGM
por: Kawaguchi, Yuji, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Japanese Study Assessing Glycemic Control with Use of IDegAsp Co-formulation in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Clinical Practice: The JAGUAR Study
por: Kaneko, Shizuka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Intensification of IDegAsp Twice Daily (Adding Insulin Aspart vs. Switching To Basal–Bolus): Exploratory Randomized Trial in Type 2 Diabetes
por: Bebakar, Wan Mohamaed Wan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The Distinct Prandial and Basal Pharmacodynamics of IDegAsp Observed in Younger Adults Are Preserved in Elderly Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes
por: Brunner, Martina, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp) in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Edina, Brenda C, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp: Results of a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison
por: Home, Philip D., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Investigational new insulin glargine 300 U/ml has the same metabolism as insulin glargine 100 U/ml
por: Steinstraesser, A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

IDegLira Versus Insulin Glargine U100: A Long-term Cost-effectiveness Analysis in the US Setting
por: Hunt, Barnaby, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Postprandial Glucose Excursions in Asian Versus Non-Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of Baseline Data from Phase 3 Randomised Controlled Trials of IDegAsp
por: Yang, Wenying, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Distinct Prandial and Basal Glucose-Lowering Effects of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp) at Steady State in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
por: Heise, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia, and weight change with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes: A 12‐month comparison by concomitant sulphonylurea and/or glinide use
por: Terauchi, Yasuo, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL to the Same Dose of Glargine 300 U/mL in Japanese Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
por: Nakanishi, Shuhei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Abstract 28: Change in glycaemic parameters in adults with type 2 diabetes initiated with or switched to insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) in a real-world setting – An analysis of Indian cohort of ARISE study
por: Baruah, Manash P, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Low Blood Glucose Index and Hypoglycaemia Risk: Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL in Type 2 Diabetes
por: Kovatchev, Boris, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative Effectiveness of Switching From First-Generation Basal Insulin to Glargine 300 U/ml or Degludec 100 U/ml in Type 1 Diabetes: The RESTORE-1 Study
por: Laviola, Luigi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of the Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira Versus Continued Up-Titration of Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the USA
por: Hunt, Barnaby, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cost of achieving HbA1c and weight loss treatment targets with IDegLira vs insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart in the USA
por: Billings, LK, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Erratum to: Evaluation of the Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira Versus Continued Up-Titration of Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the USA
por: Hunt, Barnaby, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

rDNA insulin glargine U300 – a critical appraisal
por: Wang, Fei, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Use of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in East Asians: A Review
por: Hirose, Takahisa, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 1)
por: Matsuhisa, M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Efficacy and safety of switching to insulin glargine 300 U/mL from 100 U/mL in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A 12-month retrospective analysis
por: Sugiyama, Kazutoshi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus 100 U/mL in Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
por: Vargas-Uricoechea, Hernando
Publicado: (2018)

In Silico Head-to-Head Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL and Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL in Type 1 Diabetes
por: Schiavon, Michele, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Real-World Use of Insulin Glargine U100 and U300 in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: DosInGlar Study
por: Duque, Natalia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Efficacy and Safety of IDegAsp Versus BIAsp 30, Both Twice Daily, in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase 3 Randomized Controlled BOOST Trials
por: Fulcher, Greg, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Equipotency of insulin glargine 300 and 100 U/mL with intravenous dosing but differential bioavailability with subcutaneous dosing in dogs
por: Werner, Ulrich, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk with insulin glargine 300 U/mL and insulin degludec 100 U/mL in older participants in the BRIGHT trial
por: Bolli, Geremia B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Nocturnal Glycemic Control with New Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL
por: Yu, Neng Chun
Publicado: (2019)

Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia during 12 months of randomized treatment with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL in people with type 1 diabetes (EDITION 4)
por: Home, Philip D., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2)
por: Terauchi, Y., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Efficacy of the Novel Degludec/Aspart Insulin Co-formulation in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Real-life Experience with One Year of IDegAsp Therapy in Poorly Controlled and Non-compliant Patients
por: Kırkgöz, Tarık, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reduced Hypoglycemia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Switched to/Initiating Insulin Glargine 300 vs 100 U/ml: A European Real-World Study
por: Escalada, Javier, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effect of concomitant DPPIVi use on glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes: A patient-level meta-analysis of EDITION 2 and 3
por: Yale, Jean-François, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3)
por: Bolli, G B, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION 1, 2 and 3 studies: glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes
por: Ritzel, R, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes switching from twice‐daily basal insulin to once‐daily insulin glargine 300 U/mL or insulin glargine 100 U/mL (EDITION 1 and EDITION 2 subgroup analysis)
por: Roussel, Ronan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Asia Pacific insulin‐naïve people with type 2 diabetes: The EDITION AP randomized controlled trial
por: Ji, Linong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL in High-Risk and Low-Risk Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Stratified Using Common Clinical Performance Measures
por: Lingvay, Ildiko, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Lower risk of severe hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus glargine 100 U/mL in participants with type 1 diabetes: A meta‐analysis of 6‐month phase 3 clinical trials
por: Danne, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_r361f5v5j5sv1i4o69qsatmta8