Cargando…

Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of multiple daily injections (MDI), insulin pumps, self-measured blood glucose (SMBG), and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, and their association with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and severe hypoglycemia. METHODS: In a pediatric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bratke, Heiko, Margeirsdottir, Hanna D., Assmus, Jörg, Njølstad, Pål R., Skrivarhaug, Torild
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01127-6
_version_ 1783742010808598528
author Bratke, Heiko
Margeirsdottir, Hanna D.
Assmus, Jörg
Njølstad, Pål R.
Skrivarhaug, Torild
author_facet Bratke, Heiko
Margeirsdottir, Hanna D.
Assmus, Jörg
Njølstad, Pål R.
Skrivarhaug, Torild
author_sort Bratke, Heiko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of multiple daily injections (MDI), insulin pumps, self-measured blood glucose (SMBG), and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, and their association with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and severe hypoglycemia. METHODS: In a pediatric population-based nationwide cross-sectional study, we analyzed data from 2623 participants up to 18 years of age with type 1 diabetes, using 2017 annual data from the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry. HbA1c was adjusted for age, gender, and diabetes duration. Using a linear mixed-effects model, we assessed HbA1c and the incidence of DKA and severe hypoglycemia according to the use of MDI, insulin pumps, SMBG, and CGM. RESULTS: We observed that 74.7% of participants were using an insulin pump and 52.6% were using a CGM system. Mean HbA1c was 7.8% (62 mmol/mol). The HbA1c of pump users was 0.14 percentage points (pp) higher than that of MDI users. Fewer pump users than MDI users achieved an HbA1c of < 7.5% (38.3 vs. 41.6%). CGM users had a 0.18 pp lower HbA1c than SMBG users, with 40.5 and 38.0%, respectively, achieving an HbA1c of < 7.5%. The incidence of severe hypoglycemia or hospitalization due to DKA was not different in pump and CGM users compared with nonusers. Compared with other insulin pumps, patch pump use was associated with a significantly lower odds ratio for DKA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the broad use of diabetes technology, as many as 61% of our pediatric cohort did not reach the HbA1c target recommended by the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD). Lower HbA1c was associated with CGM use but not with insulin pump use. Acute complications were not less frequent in the groups using insulin pumps or CGM compared with those using MDI and SMBG. Further research is required to explore the lower incidence of DKA among patch pump users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04201171. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01127-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8385028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83850282021-09-09 Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population Bratke, Heiko Margeirsdottir, Hanna D. Assmus, Jörg Njølstad, Pål R. Skrivarhaug, Torild Diabetes Ther Original Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of multiple daily injections (MDI), insulin pumps, self-measured blood glucose (SMBG), and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, and their association with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and severe hypoglycemia. METHODS: In a pediatric population-based nationwide cross-sectional study, we analyzed data from 2623 participants up to 18 years of age with type 1 diabetes, using 2017 annual data from the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry. HbA1c was adjusted for age, gender, and diabetes duration. Using a linear mixed-effects model, we assessed HbA1c and the incidence of DKA and severe hypoglycemia according to the use of MDI, insulin pumps, SMBG, and CGM. RESULTS: We observed that 74.7% of participants were using an insulin pump and 52.6% were using a CGM system. Mean HbA1c was 7.8% (62 mmol/mol). The HbA1c of pump users was 0.14 percentage points (pp) higher than that of MDI users. Fewer pump users than MDI users achieved an HbA1c of < 7.5% (38.3 vs. 41.6%). CGM users had a 0.18 pp lower HbA1c than SMBG users, with 40.5 and 38.0%, respectively, achieving an HbA1c of < 7.5%. The incidence of severe hypoglycemia or hospitalization due to DKA was not different in pump and CGM users compared with nonusers. Compared with other insulin pumps, patch pump use was associated with a significantly lower odds ratio for DKA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the broad use of diabetes technology, as many as 61% of our pediatric cohort did not reach the HbA1c target recommended by the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD). Lower HbA1c was associated with CGM use but not with insulin pump use. Acute complications were not less frequent in the groups using insulin pumps or CGM compared with those using MDI and SMBG. Further research is required to explore the lower incidence of DKA among patch pump users. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04201171. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01127-6. Springer Healthcare 2021-08-13 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8385028/ /pubmed/34389930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01127-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Bratke, Heiko
Margeirsdottir, Hanna D.
Assmus, Jörg
Njølstad, Pål R.
Skrivarhaug, Torild
Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population
title Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population
title_full Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population
title_fullStr Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population
title_full_unstemmed Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population
title_short Does Current Diabetes Technology Improve Metabolic Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on the Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Nationwide Pediatric Population
title_sort does current diabetes technology improve metabolic control? a cross-sectional study on the use of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring devices in a nationwide pediatric population
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8385028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-021-01127-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bratkeheiko doescurrentdiabetestechnologyimprovemetaboliccontrolacrosssectionalstudyontheuseofinsulinpumpsandcontinuousglucosemonitoringdevicesinanationwidepediatricpopulation
AT margeirsdottirhannad doescurrentdiabetestechnologyimprovemetaboliccontrolacrosssectionalstudyontheuseofinsulinpumpsandcontinuousglucosemonitoringdevicesinanationwidepediatricpopulation
AT assmusjorg doescurrentdiabetestechnologyimprovemetaboliccontrolacrosssectionalstudyontheuseofinsulinpumpsandcontinuousglucosemonitoringdevicesinanationwidepediatricpopulation
AT njølstadpalr doescurrentdiabetestechnologyimprovemetaboliccontrolacrosssectionalstudyontheuseofinsulinpumpsandcontinuousglucosemonitoringdevicesinanationwidepediatricpopulation
AT skrivarhaugtorild doescurrentdiabetestechnologyimprovemetaboliccontrolacrosssectionalstudyontheuseofinsulinpumpsandcontinuousglucosemonitoringdevicesinanationwidepediatricpopulation